Skip to main content

Principal Contributions to the Problems of Distribution and Allocation

  • Chapter
Allocation of Industry in the Andean Common Market

Part of the book series: Studies in Development and Planning ((SDAP,volume 11))

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

In the last chapter it was established that the purpose of this text is to design a method to allocate the industries of the Sectorial Programs of Industrial Development of the Andean Common Market among the member countries in a manner acceptable to all. The purpose of this chapter is to describe briefly the progress that has been made toward the solution of the problem of the assignment of industries in integration schemes among less developed countries. The review of the literature marking this progress will be limited to the following:

  1. 1.

    The description of the main approaches suggested for distributing the benefits of integration arrangements among less developed countries.

  2. 2.

    The delineation of the schemes proposed for the resolution of the industry allocation problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. A. Cooper and B.F. Massell, “Toward a General Theory of Customs Unions for Developing Countries,” Journal of Political Economy 73 (October 1965): 461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See Melvyn B. Krauss, “Recent Developments in Customs Union Theory: An Interpretive Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature X (June 1972): 413–436, for a critique of the rationale for economic integration proposed by Cooper and Massell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Robson, Economic Integration in Africa ( Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968 ), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Refer to Tayseer A. Jaber, “The Relevance of Traditional Integration Theory to Less Developed Countries,” Journal of Common Market Studies IX (March 1971): 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walter Isard, Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science (Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1960), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Refer to F.I. Nixson, Economic Integration and Industrial Location: An East African Case Study London: Longman Group Limited, 1973), pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isard, Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science, p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Refer to C.M. Heal, The Theory of Economic Planning (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charles R. Blitzer, Peter B. Clark, and Lance Taylor, eds., Economy-Wide Models and Development Planning ( London: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 1975 ), pp. 33–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Refer to L.B.M. Mennes, Planning Economic Integration Among Developing Countries ( Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The discussion of these integration schemes is based on the following: David Morawetz, The Andean Group: A Case Study in Economic Integration among Developing Countries (Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1974), pp. 111–119; Peter Robson, Economic Integration in Africa (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968); Walter Krause and F. John Mathis, Latin America and Economic Integration (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1970; F. John Mathis, Economic Integration in Latin America: The Progress and Problems of LAFTA (Austin, Texas: Bureau of Business Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1969); Karel Holbik and Philip L. Swan, Trade and Industrialization in the Central American Common Market: The First Decade, (Austin, Texas: Bureau of Business Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1972 ); and Arthur Hazelwood, Economic Integration: The East African Experience ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. McLachlan and D. Swann, Competition Policy in the European Community ( London: Oxford University Press, 1967 ), p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Miguel S. Wionczek “The Rise and Decline of Latin American Economic Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies, IX (September 1970): 53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Refer to D.C.Mead, “The Distribution of Gains in Customs Unions between Developing Countries,” in International Economic Integration, ed. P. Robson ( Bungay, Suffolk, Great Britain: The Chaucer Press, Penguin Books, 1972 ), pp. 278–303.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Refer to I.M.D. Little, “Regional International Companies As an Approach to Economic Integration,” in International Economic Integration, ed. P. Robson ( Bungay, Suffolk, Great Britain: The Chaucer Press, Penguin Books, 1972 ), pp. 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bela Balassa and Ardy Stoutjesdijk, “Integracion Economica de Paises en Desarrollo,” El Trimestre Economico XLII (July-September 1975): 565–587.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Daniel M. Schydlowsky, “Allocating Integration Industries in the Andean Group,” Journal of Common Market Studies IX (June 1971): 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Refer to Martin Carnoy, “A Welfare Analysis of Latin American Economic Union: Six Industry Studies,” Journal of Political Economy 78 (July/August 1970): 626–654, and Martin Carnoy, Industrialization in a Latin American Common Market ( Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1972 ).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlos Baanante and Richard Simmons, “Effects of Customs Union on the Nitrogenous Fertilizer Industry in the Andean Zone,” Journal of Common Market Studies XIV (March 1976): 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  20. David Kendrick, “Investment Planning and Economic Integration,” Economics of Planning VII (No. 1, 1967 ): 48–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Please see: Dermont Gately, “Sharing the Gains from Customs Unions among Less Developed Countries: A Game Theoretic Approach,” Journal of Development Economics I (December 1974): 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

ter Wengel, J. (1980). Principal Contributions to the Problems of Distribution and Allocation. In: Allocation of Industry in the Andean Common Market. Studies in Development and Planning, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8730-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8730-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8732-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8730-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics