The Validity of the Concept of Health Foods
The consistent and helpful dietary advice given during the past hundred years by the mainstream advocates of reformed eating is contrasted with the sometimes dogmatic yet contradictory guidance from doctors and nutritionists.
Examples are given of foods that can either be prepared so as to be nutritionally beneficial or as ‘junk foods’ and the question as to why nutritional consequences are not often taken into account by food manufacturers is discussed.
The arguments concerning ‘cosmetic additives’ are reviewed in the light of the counteracting influence of the health food supporters of foods as free as possible from unnecessary additions.
The question is raised as to why it is that some normally objective scientists become highly emotional whenever the subject of health foods is raised, whereas the desire and indeed the practice of the health food industry is to collaborate closely with informed expert opinion in order to educate and guide the interested public in their eating habits. Why is so much time spent in confrontation instead of education which could begin with what we give each other to eat at meetings and in schools, universities and hospitals? A more positive approach is proposed.
The future role of health foods is explored and a working definition covering selection and preparation of raw materials, chemical extractions and artificial additives suggested as providing a valid basis for the concept of health foods.
KeywordsGood Manufacturing Practice Health Food White Bread Junk Food Apply Science Publisher
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sinclair, H. M. (1972). In: Health and Food, Eds. Birch, G. G., Green, L. F. and Plasket, L. G., Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London, 11–27.Google Scholar
- 2.Moreton, R. (1970). A critical Study of ‘Health Food’ Attitudes. Thesis for B.Sc. degree, University of Reading.Google Scholar
- 3.Yudkin, J. (1973). J. Food Tech. Aust., 25(4), 201–205.Google Scholar
- 4.Whitehouse, G. T. (1968). Why Health Foods? ‘Here’s Health’, Surrey.Google Scholar
- 5.Which (1978). London, Consumers’ Association, 319–324.Google Scholar
- 6.Bender, A. E. (1978). Thoughts on an Alternative Diet. Associated Television at 12.30 on 10th October.Google Scholar
- 7.Mcgovern, G. (1977). Dietary Goals for the United States, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
- 8.Allinson, T. R. (about 1890). The Advantages of Wholemeal Bread. Reprinted from ‘Food’. Fowler, London.Google Scholar
- 9.Cleave, T. L. and Campbell, G. D. (1966). Diabetes, Coronary Thrombosis and The Saccharine Disease. John Wright, Bristol.Google Scholar
- 11.Mchenry, E. W. (1960). Food Without Fads. Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- 12.Cameron, A. G. (1968). Food and its Functions. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
- 13.assoc, of teachers of domestic science (1976). nutrition in action, london.Google Scholar
- 14.Kneipp, S. (1894). Thus Shalt Thou Live. Koesel, Bavaria.Google Scholar
- 15.Kneipp, S. (1897). The Codicil to ‘My Will’. H. Grevel, London.Google Scholar
- 16.Harris, L. J. (1955). Vitamins (4th Edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 327.Google Scholar
- 17.Mccance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. (1956). Family Doctor. August.Google Scholar
- 18.British Nutrition Foundation (1977). Why Additives, Forbes Publications, London, 22.Google Scholar
- 19.Jukes, T. H. (1971). J. Am. Diet. Assn. 59(3), 203–211.Google Scholar
- 20.Bender, A. E. (1971). Man Alive, B.B.C. Television.Google Scholar
- 21.Yudkin, J. (1978). Diet of Man: Needs & Wants. Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London.Google Scholar