Advertisement

The Effect of SO2 on Photosynthesis and Stomatal Behavior of Mediterranean-Climate Shrubs and Trees

  • W. E. Winner
Part of the Tasks for Vegetation Science book series (TAVS, volume 4)

Abstract

Air pollutants are known to have detrimental effects on the productivity of agricultural crops (e.g., Manning, Feder 1976) and native ecosystems (e.g., Miller, McBride 1975; Winner, Bewley 1978a,b; Winner et al. 1978; Kozlowski 1980) throughout the world. The vast majority of reports show that air pollutants decrease plant productivity. The few reports of stimulated growth due to air pollutants represent studies with agricultural crops (e.g., Bennett et al. 1974). Such growth stimulation of natural systems by air pollutants are not known to occur; but if they did would represent examples of eutrophication, which is a serious environmental problem usually associated with waterways.

Keywords

Stomatal Conductance Vapor Pressure Deficit Deciduous Species Evergreen Species Evergreen Shrub 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennet JP, Resh HM and Runeckles VC (1974) Apparent stimulation of plant growth by air pollutants, Can. J. Bot. 52, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bibbero RJ and Young IG (1974) Systems approach to air pollution control. New York, J. Wiley amp; Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Black VJ and Unsworth MH (1980a) A gas exchange system for measuring effects of sulphur dioxide on gas exchange of plants, J. Exp. Bot. 30, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black VJ and Unsworth MH (1980b) Stomatal responses to sulphur dioxide and vapor pressure deficit, J. Exp. Bot. 31, 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black VJ and Unsworth MH (1980c) Resistance analysis of sulphur dioxide fluxes to Vicia faba, Nature 282, 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw. AD (1976) Pollution and evolution. In Mansfield TA, ed. Effects of air pollutants on plants, pp. 209. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Harrison AT, Small E and Mooney HA (1971) Drought relationships and distribution of two mediterranean-climate California plant communities, Ecology 52, 869–875,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kozlowski TT (1980) Impacts of air pollution on forest ecosystems, Bioscience 30, 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lincoln D (1980) Leaf resin flavinoids of Diplacus aurantiacus, Biochem. Syst. Ecol. in press.Google Scholar
  10. Majernik O and Mansfield TA (1970) Direct effect of SO2 pollution on the degree of opening of stomata. Nature 227, 377–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Majernik O and Mansfield TA (1972) Stomatal responses to raised atmospheric CO2 concentrations during exposure of plants to SO2 pollution, Environ. Pollut. 3, 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Manning WJ and Feder WA (1976) Effects of ozone on economic plants. In Mansfield TA, ed. Effects of air pollutants on plants, pp. 209. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mansfield TA and Majernik O (1970) Can stomata play a part in protecting plants against air pollutants? Environ. Pollut. 1, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller PR and McBride JR (1975) Effects of air pollutants on forests. In Mudd JB and Kozlowski TT, eds. Responses of plants to air pollutants, pp. 383. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mooney HA and Dunn EL (1970) Photosynthetic systems of mediterranean-climate shrubs and trees of California and Chile, Am. Nat. 104, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mooney HA, Farrar PJ and Slatyer RO (1978) Photosynthetic capacity and carbon allocation patterns in diverse growth forms of Eucalyptus, Oecologia 36, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munz PA and Keck DD (1975) A California flora and supplement, pp. 1681 and 224. Berkeley, Univ. California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Slatyer RO (1964) Efficiency of water utilization by arid zone vegetation, Annals of Arid Zone 3, 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor GE Jr and Murdy WH (1975). Population differentiation of an annual plant species, Geranium carolinianum, in response to sulfur dioxide, Bot. Gaz. 136, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas JH (1961) Flora of the Santa Cruz Mountains of California, pp. 434. Stanford, California, Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  21. Westman WE (1979) Oxidant effects of Californian coastal sage scrub, Science 205, 1001–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Winner WE and Bewley JD (1978a) Contrasts between bryophyte and vascular plant synecological responses in an S02-stressed white spruce association in central Alberta, Oecologia 33, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winner WE and Bewley JD (1978b) Terrestrial mosses as bioindicators of SO2 pollution stress— synecological analysis and the index of atmospheric purity, Oecologia 35, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winner WE, Bewley JF, Krouse HR and Brown HM (1978) Stable sulfur isotope analysis of SO2 pollution impact on vegetation, Oecologia 36, 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winner WE and Mooney HA (1980a) Ecology of SO2 resistance: I. Effects of fumigations on gas exchange of deciduous and evergreen shrubs, Oecologia 44, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winner WE and Mooney HA (1980b) Ecology of S02 resistance: II. Photosynthetic changes of shrubs in relation to SO2 absorption and stomatal behavior. Oecologia 44, 296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winner WE and Mooney HA (1980c) Ecology of SO2 resistance: III. Metabolic changes of C3 and C4 Atriplex species due to SO2 fumigations, Oecologia 46, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winner WE and Mooney HA (1980d) Responses of Hawaiian plants to volcanic SO2: Stomatal behavior and foliar injury, Science, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston/London 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. E. Winner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations