VER Findings in Retrobulbar Neuritis Due to Multiple Sclerosis

  • M. Moschos
  • G. Palimeris
  • E. Panagakis
  • H. Pagratis
Part of the Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series book series (DOPS, volume 27)

Abstract

In this study the authors analyse the findings of VER in 25 patients suffering from retrobulbär neuritis due to multiple sclerosis.

They stress the diagnostic value of measuring the implicit time of the VER which is greater than in other pathological conditions and they point out that, in these cases, even with eyes that are at least clinically sound, the implicit time, is in a high percentage of cases, greater than normal.

Keywords

Corticosteroid Neuropathy Neurol Neuritis Cala 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asselman, P., Chadwick, D. W. & Marsden, CD. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brian 98: 261–282 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chain, F., Mallecourt, J., Leblank, & Lhermit, F. Apport de l’enregistrement des potentiels éviqués visuels au diagnostic de la sclérose en plaques. Révue neurol. (Paris) 113: 81–88(1977).Google Scholar
  3. Cook, J. H. & Arden, G. B. Unilateral retrobulbär neuritis; A comparison of evoked potentials and psychophysical measurements. In: Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments (Ed. J. E. Desmedt). Claredon Press, Oxford. 450–457 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. Feinsod, M. & Hoyt, W. F. Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 38: 1109–1114 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halliday, A. M., McDonald, W. I. & Mushin, J. Delayed VER in optic neuritis. Lancet 1: 982–985 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halliday, A. M. the effect of lesions of the visual pathway and cerebrum on the visual evoked response. In: Evoked Potentials, Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Vol. 8A (Ed. W. S. Van Leuven, F. H. Lopes da Silva & A. Kamp) 119–129 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. Halliday, A. M. Visually evoked responses in optic nerve diseases. Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U. K. 96: 372(1976).Google Scholar
  8. Halliday, A. M., McDonald, W. I., Mushin, J. Visual evoked potentials in patients with demylinating disease. In: Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments (Ed. J. E. Desmedt). Clarendon Press, Oxford. 357–438 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. Hennerici, M., Wenzel, D. & Freud, HJ. The comparison of small side rectangle and checkboard stimulation of the evaluation of delayed VER in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 96: 69–78 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. Korol, S. & Babel, J. Les potentiels évoqués visuels et l’ophtalmoscopie à la lumière anerythre dans les formes subcliniques des névrites rétrobulbäres de 1a sclérose en plaques. J. Fr. Ophtal. 2: 463–470 (1979).Google Scholar
  11. Mastaglia, F. L., Black, J. L. & Cala, L. A. Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities and computerised tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br. Med. J. 1: 1315–1317(1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McDonald, W. I. Conduction in the optic nerve. Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K. 96: 352 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. McDonald, W. I. & Sears, T. A. The effect of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. Brain 93: 538–598 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. Moschos, M., Palimeris, G., Panagakis, E. & Pagratis, H. The diagnostic value of the implicit time of VER in the diagnosis of retrobulbär neuritis. Bull. Hell. Ophthal. Soc. (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Moschos
    • 1
  • G. Palimeris
    • 1
  • E. Panagakis
    • 1
  • H. Pagratis
    • 1
  1. 1.National Ophthalmological Centre of AthensAthens University Eye ClinicCholargos-AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations