Skip to main content

A Clinical Comparison of three Computerized Automatic Perimeters in the Detection of Glaucoma Defects

  • Chapter
Fourth International Visual Field Symposium Bristol, April 13–16,1980

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 26))

Abstract

The ability to detect glaucomatous field defects of 3 automatic computerized perimeters (COMPETER, OCTOPUS and PERIMETRON) was compared in a clinical study of 74 patients, some suffering from established glaucoma, with normals, and glaucoma suspects in whom the visual fields were completely normal. The reference fields were obtained by careful static and kinetic manual perimetry on the Tübingen perimeter. All the automatic instruments gave similar high rates of detection of field loss and low false positive results. Quality conventional manual perimetry is still necessary to back up automatic Perimetric results but automatic perimeters can already take over a large proportion of routine perimetric screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aulhorn, E. & W. Durst. Comparative investigation of automatic and manual perimetry in different visual field defects. Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 14: 17–22 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bebie, H., F. Fankhauser & J. Spahr. Static perimetry: Strategies. Acta Ophthalmol. 54: 325–338 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bynke, H., A. Heijl & C. Holmin. Automatic computerized perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 19: 319–325 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyster-Aas, K., A. Heijl & L. Lundqvist. Computerized visual screening in the management of patients with ocular hypertension. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heijl, A. Automatic perimetry in glaucoma visual field screening. A clinical study.Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 200: 21–37 (1976)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heijl, A., S. M. Drance & G. R. Douglas. The value of an automatic perimeter (Competer) in detecting early glaucomatous visual field defects. Arch. Ophthalmol. Accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heijl, A. & S. M. Drance. Computerized profile perimetry in glaucoma. Arch. Ophthamol. Accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heijl, A. & C. E. T. Krakau. An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control. Construction and clinical cases. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 197: 13–23 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heijl, A. Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 55: 696–708 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heijl, A. Computer test logics for automatic perimetry. Acta. Ophthalmol. 55: 837–853 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heijl, A. & C. E. T. Krakau. A note on fixation during perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 55:854–861(1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heijl, A. & S. M. Drance. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, S. G., G. L. Spaeth, N. J. Schatz et al. Clinical experiences with the use of anautomated perimeter (Octopus) in the management of patients with glaucoma and neurological disease. Ophthalmol. 85: 74 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Proll, M. Die Varianz der Befunderhebung bei der kinetischen und der computer-gesteuerten Perimetrie. Inaugural-Dissertation, Julius-Maximilians-Universit ät, W ürzburg, Federal Republic of Germany (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmied, U. Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma. In: Proc. Int. meeting automated perimetry system Octopus. Interzeag. publ., Schlieren, Switzerland (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spahr, J., F. Fankhauser, A. Jenni et al. Praktische Erfahrungen mit dem automat-ischen Perimeter Octopus. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 172: 470–477 (1978).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spahr, J. Zur Automatisierung der Perimetrie. I: Die Anwendung eines computer-gesteuerten Perimeters. Albrecht von Graves Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 188: 323–338 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. L. Greve G. Verriest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heijl, A., Drance, S.M. (1981). A Clinical Comparison of three Computerized Automatic Perimeters in the Detection of Glaucoma Defects. In: Greve, E.L., Verriest, G. (eds) Fourth International Visual Field Symposium Bristol, April 13–16,1980. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8644-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8644-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8646-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8644-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics