Abstract
This paper offers an attempt to summarize, compare and critically examine methods of long range weather forecasting and to suggest avenues where greater progress might be found.
It starts out with some general remarks about the extremely complex nature of the prediction problem on time scales of months, seasons and years, which explains in large part the low degree of skill presently achieved. Also discussed are the poor quality and quantity of available global data, a deficiency which is frequently and erroneously advanced as the principal cause of forecast failures. But it is concluded that the root of the problem and the main obstacle in the quest for better long range forecasts is a lack of understanding of the physics governing these large scale phenomena.
There follows a treatment of methods used which involve statistical, synoptic and physical (conceptual) procedures.
Among the methods are:
-
1.
The use of analogues (similar past situations which can be used as guides for the future).
-
2.
Long period trends in atmospheric data.
-
3.
Teleconnections, or interactions between remote anomalous weather-producing circulations.
-
4.
Regression equations and adaptations of empirical orthogonal functions and other devices designed to arrive at significant lag relationships.
-
5.
Climatological contingencies indicating probabilities of monthly or seasonal surface temperature and precipitation following given observed conditions.
-
6.
Use of the anomalous character of surface boundary conditions like snow cover, sea surface temperature and soil moisture to determine probable forcing and stabilization of anomalous atmospheric patterns (including storm tracks, etc.).
In practice the above methods are usually used jointly, with a weighting which changes according to situation. This weighting, largely subjective, is often the reason for both forecast success and forecast failure.
Some evaluations of forecast skill are presented which can be viewed as encouraging or discouraging, depending on the receptivity of the reader.
Finally, an optimistic view of the future is presented wherein greater understanding of the physics of large space and time scales may permit numerical (dynamical) long range simulations and predictions for months or seasons and conceivably open the door to predictions of anomalous climate regimes for years and decades. This happy event defies setting a time frame, so that prediction of the state of the art years hence becomes as difficult as a long range weather forecast a season in advance is at present. However, some recent encouraging dynamical predictions out to a month or so give some cause for optimism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adern, J.: 1973, “Ocean effects on weather and climate,” Geofis. Intern. 13, 1.
Barnett, T. P. and Preisendorfer, R. W.: 1978, “Multifield Analog Prediction of Short-Term Climate Fluctuations using a Climate State Vector,” J. Atmos. Sci. 35, pp. 1771–1787.
Baur, F.: 1948, “Einführung in die Grosswetterkunde” (Introduction to Long-Range Weather Science), Dieterich, Wiesbaden, 165 pp.
Bowen, D.: 1976, “Long-range weather forecasting, Water Power and Dam Construction,”July, (describes the British analogue method), pp. 31–35.
Gilman, D. L.: 1957, “Empirical orthogonal functions applied to thirty-day forecasting,” Sci. Rep. No. 1, Contract AF19(604)1283, 129 pp.
Girs, A.: 1974, “Macro-circulation Method for Long-Term Meteorological Prediction”, (In Russian), Hydrometeosdat, Leningrad, 487 pp.
Klein, W. H.: 1965, “Application of synoptic climatology and short-range numerical prediction to five-day forecasting”, U. S. Weather Bur. Res. Paper No. 46, 109 pp.
Namais, J.: 1953, “Thirty-day forecasting, a review of a ten-year experiment”, Meteoral. Monographs 2 (6), 83 pp.
Namias, J.: 1964, “A five-year experiment in the preparation of seasonal outlooks”, Mon. Wea. Rev. 92 (10), pp. 449–464.
Namias, J.: 1968, “Long-range weather forecasting—history, current status and outlook”, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 49 (5), pp. 438–470.
Namias, J.: 1975, “Short Period Climatic Variations, Collected Works of J. Namias, 1934 through 1974”,U. of Calif., San Diego, 905 pp.
Nicholls, N. F.: 1980, “Long-range forecasting—values, status, and prospects”, Unpublished manuscript.
Ratcliffe, R. A. S.: 1970, “New lag associations between North Atlantic sea temperature and European pressure applied to long-range weather forecasting”, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 96, pp. 226–246.
U. S. Dept. of Commerce: 1961, “Verification of the Weather Bureau’s 30-day outlooks”, Tech. Paper No. 39, 58 pp.
Wada, H.: 1969, “Introduction to Long-Range Forecasting”, (in Japanese), Chijinshokan Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 234 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Namias, J. (1981). State of the Art of Predicting Short Period Climatic Variations. In: Bach, W., Pankrath, J., Schneider, S.H. (eds) Food-Climate Interactions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8563-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8563-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1354-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8563-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive