Source Location in Laterally Varying Media

  • David Gubbins
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (ASIC, volume 74)

Abstract

This paper deals with the interpretation of travel times of seismic waves from earthquakes and explosions. The location of seismic sources comes ultimately from travel time data but the same data are used in evaluating the wave speeds within the Earth itself, so the two problems of source location and velocity determination cannot be separated. In the early work of Jeffreys and Bullen a large set of travel times from earthquakes was used to refine the locations as well as to calculate the travel times of waves as a function of distance. Since that time instruments have improved and more data has become available but the J-B model is still in date. The principal problem with improving travel time models has been that the Earth is not spherically symmetric and it is simply not possible to fit the data with a spherically symmetric model. For example Herrin et al (22) give an improved set of travel time tables that are considered to be a better fit to the oceanic regions of the world. This reflects improved station coverage rather than any new understanding about Earth. It is clear that further developments must take account of lateral variations within the Earth.

Considerable efforts have been made recently towards finding lateral variations immediately beneath arrays of seismometers (e.g. Aki et al.(1)). These studies are often restricted to regions where there happens to be an array of seismometers, such as at NORSAR or LASA. The velocity models derived from the data are in many instances rather ambiguous. A more serious problem is that all the travel time anomalies are assumed to arise from lateral variations beneath the array whereas we know that the most inhomogeneous parts of the Earth are near sources and so a possible bias in the results will come from source effects. While the idea of finding lateral variations without relocating the sources is an attractive one, there is no sure alternative to finding locations and velocity models simultaneously, as Jeffreys & Bullen did for spherically symmetric models.

Keywords

Europe Turkey Expense Resi Tate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Aki, K., Christoffersson, A. and Husebye, E.S.: 1976. Three dimensional structure of the lithosphere under Montana LASA. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, pp. 501–524.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Aki, K., Christoffersson, A. and Husebye, E.S: 1977. Determination of the three dimensional seismic structure of the lithosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 82, pp. 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Aki, K. and Lee, W.H.K.: 1976. Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earth-quakes. 1. A homogeneous initial model. J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 4381–4399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Ansell, J.H. and Smith, E.G.C.: 1975. Detailed structure of a mantle seismic zone using the homogeneous station method. Nature 253, pp. 518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, F.: 1967. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 13, pp. 247–276.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Berteussen, K.A., Husebye, E.S., Mereu, R.F. and Ram, A.: 1977. Quantitative assessment of the crust-upper mantle heterogeneities beneath the Gauribi- danur seismic array in Southern India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 37, pp. 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Bessonova, E.N., Fishman, V.M., Ryaboyi, V.Z. and Sitnikova, G.A.: 1974. The tau method for the inversion of travel times — I. Deep seismic sounding data. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 36, pp. 377–398.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Bessonova, E.N., Fishman, V.M., Johnson, L.R., Shnirman, M.G. and Sitnikova, G.A.: 1976. The tau method for the inversion of travel times — II. Earthquake data. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 46, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Buland, R.: 1976. The mechanics of locating earthquakes. Bull Seism. Soc. Am. 66, pp. 173–187.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Bullen, K.E.: 1965. An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology. Cambridge Univ. Press., London, 381 pp.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Chou, C.W. and Booker, J.R.: 1979. A Backus-Gilbert approach to inversion of travel time data for three-dimensional velocity structure. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 59, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Christoffersson, A. and Husebye, E.S.: 1979. On three dimensional inversion of P wave time residuals: Option for geological modelling. J. Geophys. Res. 84, pp. 6168–6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Crosson, R.S.: 1976. Crustal structure modeling of earthquake data. 1. Simultaneous least squares estimation of hypocenter and velocity parameters. J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 3036–3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Ellsworth, W.L.: 1977. Three dimensional structure of the crust and mantle beneath the Island of Hawaii. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Evernden, J.F.: 1969. Precision of epicenters obtained by small numbers of world-wide stations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 59, pp. 1365–1398.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Fitch, T.J.: 1975. Compressional velocity in source regions of deep earthquakes: An application of the master earthquake technique. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 26, pp. 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Garmany, J.: 1979. On the inversion of travel times. Geophys. Res. Lett. 6, pp. 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Garmany, J., Orcutt, J.A. and Parker, R.L.: 1979. Travel time inversion: a geometrical approach. J. Geophys. Res. 84, pp. 3615–3622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Gerver, M.L. and Markushevich, V.M.: 1966. Determination of seismic wave velocity from the travel-time curve. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 11, pp. 165–173.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Gerver, M.L. and Markushevich, V.M.: 1967. On the characteristic properties of travel time curves. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 13, pp. 241–246.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Haddon, R.A.W. and Husebye, E.S.: 1978. Joint interpretation of P-wave time and amplitude anomalies in terms of lithospheric heterogeneities. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 55, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Herrin, E., Arnold, E.P., Bolt, B.A., Clawson, G.E., Engdahl, E.R., Freedman, H.W., Gordon, D.W., Hales, A.L., Lobdell, J.L., Nuttli, O, Romney, C., Taggart, J. and Tucker, W.: 1978. Seismological tables for P phases. Bull Seism. Soc. Am. 58, pp. 1193–1241.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Hovland, J., Gubbins, D. and Husebye, E.S.: 1980. Upper mantle heterogeneities beneath Central Europe. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Husebye, E.S., Christoffersson, A., Aki, K. and Powell, C: 1976. Preliminary results on the 3-dimensional seismic structure of the lithosphere under the USGS central California seismic array. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 46, pp. 319–340.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Husebye, E.S., Haddon, R.A.W. and King, D.W.: 1977. Precursors to P’P’ and upper mantle discontinuities. J. Geophys. 43, pp. 535–543.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    ISC Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre. July 1977. ISC, Newbury Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Iyer, H.M.: 1974. Teleseismic evidence for the existence of low velocity material deep into the upper mantle under the Yellowstone Caldera. (abstract) EOS Trans. A. Geophys. Union 56, pp. 1190.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Jackson, D.D.: 1972. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 28, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Jackson, J.: 1980 Errors in focal depth determination and the depth of seismicity in Iran and Turkey. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 61, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Jeffreys, H.: 1961. Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 447 pp.Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    Jeffreys, H.A. and Bullen, K.E.: 1970. Seismological Tables. British Association for the Advancement of Science, Gray Miln Trust, London.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Johnson, L.E. and Gilbert, F.: 1972a. A new datum for use in the body wave travel time inverse problem Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 30, pp. 373–380.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Johnson, L.E. and Gilbert, F.: 1972b. Inversion and inference for teleseismic ray data. Methods in Comp. Phys. 12, pp. 231–266.Google Scholar
  34. (34).
    Julian, B.R.: 1970. Ray tracing in arbitrarily heterogeneous media. Lincoln Lab. Tech. Note, 1970-45.Google Scholar
  35. (35).
    Julian, B.R. and Gubbins, D.: 1977. Three dimensional seismic ray tracing. J. Geophys. 43, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar
  36. (36).
    Kennett, B.L.N.: 1976. A comparison of travel time inversions. Geophys. J. Astr. Soc. 44, pp. 517–536.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Kennett, B.L.N.: 1978. Ray theoretical inverse methods in geophysics. In Applied Inverse Problems, ed. P.C. Sabatier, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Lanczos, C: 1961. Linear Differential Operators. Van Nostrand, London, 564 PP.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Lawson, C.L. and Hanson, R.J.: 1973. Solving Least Squares Problems. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 340 pp.Google Scholar
  40. (40).
    Lillwall, R.C. and Douglas, A.: 1970. Estimation of P-wave travel times using the joint epicentre method. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 19, pp. 165–181.Google Scholar
  41. (41).
    Masters, T.G.: 1979. Observational constraints on the chemical and thermal structure of the Earth’s deep interior. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 57, pp. 507–534.Google Scholar
  42. (42).
    Menke, W.H.: 1977. Lateral inhomogeneities in P velocity under the Tarbela array of the Lesser Himalayas of Pakistan. Bull Seism. Soc. Am. 67, pp. 725–734.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Mitchell, B.J., Cheng, C.C. and Stauder, W.: 1977. A three dimensional velocity model of the lithosphere beneath the new Madrid seismic zone. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 62, pp. 1061–1074.Google Scholar
  44. (44).
    Orcutt, J.A.: 1980. Joint linear, extremal inversion of seismic kinematic data. J. Geophys. Res. 85, pp. 2649–2660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Parker, R.L.: 1977. Linear inference and underparameterized models. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 15, pp. 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Pavlis, G.L. and Booker, J.R.: 1980. The mixed discrete-continuous inverse problem: Application to the simultaneous determination of earthquake hypocenters and velocity structure. J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  47. (47).
    Romanowicz, B.: 1979. Seismic structure of the upper mantle beneath the United States by three dimensional inversion of body wave arrival times. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 57, pp. 479–506.Google Scholar
  48. (48).
    Romanowitz, B.A.: 1980. Large scale lateral variations of P velocity in the upper mantle beneath Western Europe. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
  49. (49).
    Smith, M.L., Julian, B.R., Engdahl, E.R., Gubbins, D. and Gross, R.: 1979. Linearized inversion of travel times for three dimensional Earth structure (Abstract). EOS Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 59, p. 12.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    Spencer, C. and Gubbins, D.: 1980. Travel time inversion for simultaneous earthquake location and velocity structure determination in laterally varying media. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 62., in press.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Wiggins, R.: 1972. The general linear inverse problem: Implications of surface waves and free oscillations on Earth structure. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10, pp. 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. (52).
    Wu, J.C.: 1977. Inversion of travel time data for seismic velocity structure in three dimensions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Gubbins
    • 1
  1. 1.Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth SciencesCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations