Abstract
The major objections to the view so far presented would center around the charge that it is subjectivistic, commits the genetic fallacy, is, in fact, anthropomorphic, is guilty of the intentionalist fallacy, and perhaps of a romantic “nature nostalgia”. Against such charges from certainty-oriented philosophies like neo-Thomism, transcendental phenomenology, and some versions of Marxism, we would argue that explanations as such are partial, and the difference among philosophies is not that one of them has complete explanations and the others do not, but rather that one recognizes that explanations are partial and the others do not. This is but to reaffirm the importance of contextualism from another point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rockmore, T., Gavin, W.J., Colbert, J.G., Blakeley, T.J. (1981). Science and Progress. In: Marxism and Alternatives. Sovietica, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8495-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8495-0_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8497-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8495-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive