Skip to main content

Some Implications of ‘Theory Absorption’ for Economic Theory and the Economics of Information

  • Chapter
Philosophy in Economics

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 16))

Abstract

This paper is in two parts. The first part recounts the implications of Morgenstern’s concept of ‘theory absorption’ for three economic theories. First, the concept of the core, as it exists within the game-theoretical account of bilateral markets, is shown to lead to self-destroying predictions. Second, the traditional theory of consumer behavior is shown to be untestable in the face of absorption of alternative theories. Finally, the random walk theory of stock price behavior is shown to be immune to absorption, i.e., the theory is absorption proof. The second part of the paper presents the standard account of the economics of information and traces the implications of an inductive logic formalization of absorption upon that account. It is shown that the primary theorem of the standard account does not hold for the revised theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balch, M., ‘On recent developments in subjective expected utility’, pp. 45–55 in[3] Balch, M., McFadden, D. L. and Wu, S. Y. (eds.), Essays on Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balch, M. and Fishburn, P., ‘Subjective expected utility for conditional primitives’, pp. 57–69 in [3] Balch, M., McFadden, D. L. and Wu, S. Y. (eds.), Essays on Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balch, M., McFadden, D. L. and Wu, S. Y. (eds.), Essays on Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackwell, D., ‘Equivalent comparisons of experiments’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 24 (1953), 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dacey, R., ‘Theory absorption and the testability of economic theory’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 36: 3–4 (December, 1976 ), 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dacey, R., ‘A theory of conclusions’, Philosophy of Science, 45: 4 (December, 1978 ), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dacey, R., ‘The role of ambiguity in manipulating voter behavior’, Theory and Decision, 10: 1–4 (January, 1979), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbard, A., ‘Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result’, Econometrica 41 (1973), 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunberg, E. and Modigliani, F., ‘The predictability of social events’, Journal of Political Economy, 62: 6 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hempel, C., ‘Deductive-nomological versus statistical explanation’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, ( H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962, pp. 98–169.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilpinen, R., Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic (Acta Philosphica Fennica, Vol. 21), North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffrey, R. C., The Logic of Decision, McGraw-Hill, Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hintikka, J., ‘Towards a theory of inductive generalization’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hintikka, J., ‘On a combined system of inductive logic’, Studia Logico-Mathematica et Philosophica in Honorem Rolf Nevanlinna (Fasc. 18 in Acta Philosophica Fennica), Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hintikka, J., ‘A Two-Dimensional Continuum of Inductive Methods’, in Hintikka and Suppes (eds,), Aspects of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam, 1966, pp. 113–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hintikka, J. and Pietarinen, J., ‘Semantic information and inductive logic’, in Hintikka and Suppes (eds.), Aspects of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam, 1966, pp. 96–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffrey, R. C., ‘New foundations for a Bayesian decision theory’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Logic Methodology and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeffrey, R. C., ‘Frameworks for preference’, pp. 74–79 in [3] Balch, M., McFadden, D. L. and Wu, S. Y. (eds.), Essays on Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kitts, D., The Structure of Geology, Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, Texas, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kyburg, Henry, ‘The rule of detachment in inductive logic’, in I. Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 98–119,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lancaster, K., ‘A new approval to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 74 (1966), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lancaster, K., Consumer Demand: A New Approach, Columbia University Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levi, I., Gambling with Truth, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luce, R. D. and Krantz, D. H., ‘Conditional expected utility’, Econometrica 39 (1971), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marget, A. W., ‘Morgenstern on the methodology of economic forecasting’, Journal of Political Economy, 37: 3 (June, 1929), 312–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marschak, J., ‘Economics of information systems’, in M. Intriligator (ed.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1971, pp. 32–107.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marschak, J. ‘Information, decision, and the scientist’, in C. Cherry (ed.), Pragmatic Aspects of Human Communication, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marschak, J. and Radner, R., Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1972,

    Google Scholar 

  29. May, S. and Harper, W. L., ‘Toward an optimization procedure for applying minimum change principles in probability kinematics’, in W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol. 1, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1976, pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morgenstern, O., Wirtschaftsprognose, eine Untersuchung ihrer Voraussetzungen und Moglichkeiten, Julius Springer Verlag, Vienna, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morgenstern O., Die Grenzen Wirtschaftspolitik, Julius Spring Verlag, Vienna, 1934, translated by Vera Smith, as The Limits of Economics, W. Hodge and Co., Ltd., London, 1937. (All references will be to the latter book.)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morgenstern, O., ‘Vollkommene voraussieht und wirtschaftliches gleichgewicht’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 6: 3 (August, 1935), pp. 337–357, translated by Frank H. Knight as ‘Perfect foresight and economic equilibrium’, pp. 169–183 in [35]. (All references will be to the latter paper.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morgenstern, O., ‘Descriptive, predictive and normative theory’, Kyklos 25 (1972), 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morgenstern, O., ‘Thirteen critical points in contemporary economic thoery: an interpretation’, The Journal of Economic Literature, 10: 4 (December, 1972), 1163–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morgenstern, O. and Schwödiauer, G., ‘Competition and collusion in bilateral Markets’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökomie 36 (1976), 217–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. v. Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R., Theoretical Concepts and Hypotetico-Inductive Inference, Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Salmon, W. C., ‘Who needs inductive acceptance rules?’, in I. Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Satterthwaite, M. A., ‘Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions’, Journal of Economic Theory 10 (1975), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Savage, J. L., The Foundations of Statistics, J. Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schneeweiss, H., ‘Probability and utility — dual concepts in decision theory’, pp. 113–144 in G. Menges, (ed.) Information, Inference and Decision, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schotter, A., ‘Core allocations and competitive equilibrium — a survey’, Zeitschift für Nationalökonomie 33 (1973), 281–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schotter, A. (ed.), Selected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern, New York University Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shapley, L. S., ‘The Solutions of a Symmetric Game’, Annals of Mathematics Studies 40 (1959), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M., ‘Competitive outcomes in the cores of market games’, International Journal of Game Theory 4 (1975), 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shubik, M., ‘Edgeworth Market Games’, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 40 (1959), 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dacey, R. (1981). Some Implications of ‘Theory Absorption’ for Economic Theory and the Economics of Information. In: Pitt, J.C. (eds) Philosophy in Economics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8394-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8394-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8396-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8394-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics