Advertisement

The Experimental Basis for Oral Immunisation Against Cholera

  • N. F. Pierce
Part of the Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science book series (CTVM, volume 12)

Abstract

For nearly a century cholera immunisation has been given parenterally, with very limited success. Experimental vaccines have varied in antigenic composition, but not in route of administration. Recent studies on immunologic defence of the gut emphasise the role of intraluminal (secretory) antibody in protection against non-invasive pathogens, such as V. cholerae, and permitted detailed comparison of the effectiveness of parenteral or local (oral) immunisation in stimulating protective responses.

Parenteral immunisation may provide brief protection by stimulating high, but transient, levels of serum IgG antibody, which enters the gut passively and inefficiently. Under some conditions, parenteral immunisation may also stimulate the mucosal IgA immune system, but this effect is followed by long-lasting suppression of the mucosal IgA response and cannot be repeated. In contrast, the enteric mucosal immune system appears designed for efficient response to mucosal antigens and protection of mucosal surfaces. This design includes specialised mechanisms for sampling of mucosal antigens, cellular traffic patterns which disseminate immunologic memory to distant mucosae but focus the specific antibody response at the site of antigen exposure, and the production of secretory IgA antibody which is efficiently secreted to the mucosal surface. Some features of antigens which favour mucosal immunogenicity have been identified and long-lasting memory in this system has been observed. Oral immunisation with killed or living bacterial antigens has been shown to evoke relatively long-lasting protection against mucosal infection.

Present evidence strongly favours oral immunisation with appropriately selected antigens as the best approach to immunoprophylaxis of cholera and related enteric infections.

Keywords

Cholera Toxin Mucosal Immune System Mucosal Immune Response Oral Immunisation Intestina1 Immune Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benenson, A.S., Mosley, W.H., Fahimuddin, M. and Oseasohn, R.O., 1968. Cholera vaccine field trials in East Pakistan. 2. Effectiveness in the field. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 38, 359.Google Scholar
  2. Cash, R.A., Music, S.I., Libonati, J.P., Craig, J.P., Pierce, N.F. and Hornick, R.B., 1974. Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. II. Protection from illness afforded by previous disease and vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 130, 325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crabb¨¦, P.A., Nash, D.P., Bazin, H., Eyssen, H. and Heremans, J.F., 1969. Antibodies of the IgA type in intestinal plasma cells of germ-free mice after oral or parenteral immunisation with ferritin. J. Exp. Med. 130, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curlin, G., Levine, R., Aziz, K.M.A., Rahman, M.A.S.M. and Verwey, W.F., 1975. Field trial of cholera toxoid. In: Proc. 11th US - Japan Cholera Conf. 314. US Department of Health Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  5. Gearhart, P.J. and Cebra, J.J., 1979. Differentiated B lymphocytes:potential to express particular antibody variable and constant regions depends on site of lymphoid tissue and antigen loan. J. Exp. Med. 149, 216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Husband, A.J. and Gowans, J.L., 1978. The origin and antigen-dependent distribution of IgA-containing cells in the intestine.J. Exp. Med. 148, 1146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ishizuka, M., Braun, W. and Matsumoto, T., 1971. Cyclic AMP and immune responses. 1. Influence of poly A: U and cAMP on antibody formation in Vito J. Immunol 107, 1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McCleery, J.L., Kraft, S.C. and Rothberg, R.M., 1970. Demonstration of antibody in rabbit feces after active or passive parenteral immunisation. Digestion 3, 213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McWilliams, M., Phillips-Quagliata, J.M. and Lamm, M.E., 1977. Mesenteric lymph node B lymphoblasts which home to the small intestine are precommitted to IgA synthesis. J. Exp. Med. 145, 866.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mosley, W.H., 1969. The role of immunity in cholera. A review of epidemiological and serological Studies. Texas Reports on Biology and Medicine 27 (supplement 1), 227.Google Scholar
  11. Ogra, P.L. and Karzon, D.T., 1969. Distribution of poliovirus antibody in serum, nasopharynx and alimentary tract following segmental immunisation of lower alimentary tract with polio vaccine.J. Immunol. 120, 1423.Google Scholar
  12. Oseasohn, R.O., Benenson, A.S. and Fahimuddin, M., 1965. Field trial of cholera vaccine in rural East Pakistan. Lancet i, 450.Google Scholar
  13. Pierce, N.F., 1978. The role of antigen form and function in the primary and secondary intestinal immune responses to cholera toxoid and toxin in rats. J. Exp. Med. 148, 195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pierce, N.F., 1980. Suppression of the intestinal immune response to cholera toxin by specific serum antibody. Infect and Immun, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Pierce, N.F., Cray, W.C. Jr. and Engel, P.F., 1980. Antitoxin immunity to cholera in dogs immunised orally with cholera toxin. Infect, and Immun. 27, 632.Google Scholar
  16. Pierce, N.F., Cray, W.C. and Sircar, B.K., 1978. Induction of a mucosal antitoxin response and its role in immunity to experimental canine cholera. Infect and Immun. 21, 185.Google Scholar
  17. Pierce, N.F. and Gowans, J.L., 1975. Cellular kinetics of the intestinal immune response to cholera toxoid in rats. J. Exp. Med. 142, 1550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pierce, N.F. and Koster, F.T., 1980. Priming and suppression of the intestinal immune response to cholera toxoid/toxin by parenteral toxoid in rats. J. Immunol. 124, 307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierce, N.F. and Reynolds, H.Y., 1974. Immunity to experimental cholera. I. Protective effect of humoral IgG antitoxin demonstrated by passive immunisation. J. Immunology 113, 1017.Google Scholar
  20. Pierce, N.F., Sack, R.B. and Sircar, B.K., 1977. Immunity to experimental cholera. III. Enhanced duration of protection after sequential parenteral-oral administration of toxoid to dogs. J. Infect. Dis. 135, 888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Svennerholm, A.M., Holmgren, J., Hanson, L.A., Lindblad, B.S., Quereshi, F. and Rahimtoola, R.J., 1977. Boosting of secretory IgA antibody responses in man by parenteral cholera vaccination. Scan. J. Immunol. 6, 1345.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, H.C. and Parrott, D.M.V., 1974. The induction of tolerance to a soluble protein antigen by oral administration. J. Immunol. 27, 631.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, W.A. and Isselbacher, K.L., 1977. Intestinal antibodies. New Engl. J. Med. 297, 767.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. F. Pierce
    • 1
  1. 1.The Departments of Medicine of Johns HopkinsUniversity School of Medicine and Baltimore City HospitalsBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations