Psychological Impact on Patients and Staff
Far more than most other medical procedures, abortion is surrounded by social considerations and poses a number of potential problems for all concerned with it. Dealing with second-trimester abortion is particularly difficult, not only because the fetus may be perceived less as a potential life at some time in the distance future (and more as a baby at that moment), but also because the woman who delays her decision to seek an abortion may be emotionally more fragile than the woman who chooses to abort early. To compound matters further, patient and staff reactions to second-trimester abortion clearly are influenced by the characteristics of the method of pregnancy termination per se. The use of dilatation and evacuation in the second trimester presents a unique situation; what may be best for the patient may be most upsetting for her physician and his/her colleagues.
KeywordsObstet Gynecol Therapeutic Abortion Abortion Care Trimester Abortion Strong Emotional Reaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Ekblad M: Induced abortion on psychiatric grounds: a follow-up study of 479 women. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand. (suppl)99:3, 1955.Google Scholar
- 5.Ewin JA, Rouse BA: Therapeutic abortion and a prior psychiatric history. Am J Psychiatry 130:37, 1976.Google Scholar
- 12.Center for Disease Control: Abortion surveillance—United States, 1976. Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 27:175, 1978.Google Scholar
- 14.Bibring GL, Dwyer TF, Huntington DS, et al: A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother-child relationship. Psychoanal Study Child 16:9, 1961.Google Scholar
- 19.Kane FJ, Feldman M, Jain S, et al: Emotional reactions of abortion services personnel. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:409-411, 1973.Google Scholar
- 20.Kaltreider N, Goldsmith S, Margolis A: The impact of midtrimester abortion techniques on patients and staff. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 28:409, 1973.Google Scholar
- 21.McNair D, Lorr M, Doppleman L: Profile of Mood States Manual San Diego, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971.Google Scholar