Intermittent Intraventricular Blocks

  • Paolo Alboni
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 12)

Abstract

Intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD) in most cases are permanent. At times they persist for a variable period, generally secondary to acute affections and independent of cardiac rate, and then disappear. Such a type of IVCD is therefore defined as transient. The appearance and the disappearance of IVCD may also occur from one beat to another, usually in relation to changes in cardiac rate. In these cases the IVCD is defined as intermittent. If the aberrancy occurs during very early beats in relation to physiologic dishomogeneous refractoriness of the main intraventricular pathways it is defined as functional. Considering the longest duration of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) recovery time is approximately 400 msec [1, 2] (Figure 1), an IVCD which appears after longer cardiac cycles should be considered pathologic.

Keywords

Fatigue Ischemia Catecholamine Cardiol Acetylcholine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moe GK, Mendez C: Functional block in the intraventricular conduction system. Circulation 43: 949, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schuilenburg RM, Durrer D: Rate-dependency of functional block in the human His bundle and bundle branch-Purkinje system. Circulation 48: 526, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alboni P, Malacarne C, Pradella A, Masoni A: 2:1 and phase 4 peri-infarction block. Europ J Cardiol 10: 205, 1979Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alboni P: Il blocco periferico settale sinistro. Ipotesi fisiopatologica o nuovo elemento diagnostico? G Ital Cardiol 10: 365, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman BF, Cranefield PF: Electrophysiology of the heart. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer DH, Lazzara R, Hoffman BF: Interrelationships between automaticity and conduction in Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 21: 537, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Massumi RA: Bradycardia-dependent bundle branch block: a critique and proposed criteria. Circulation 38: 1066, 1, 968Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singer DH, Ten Eick RE: Aberrancy: electrophysiologic aspects. Am J Cardiol 28: 381, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barold SS, Schamroth L: Tachycardia-dependent left bundle branch block associated with bradycardia-dependent variable left bundle branch block. A case report. Circulation 38: 216. 1973Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO, Halpern MS, Nau GJ, Levi RJ: The mechanism of intermittent bundle branch block: relationship to prolonged recovery, hypopolarization and spontaneous diastolic depolarization. Chest 63: 666, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Sherif N: Tachycardia-and bradycardia-dependent bundle branch block after acute myocardial ischaemia. Br Heart J 36: 291, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Sherif N, Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R, Samet P: Pathophysiology of tachycardia-and bradycardia-dependent block in the canine proximal His-Purkinje system after acute myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 33: 529, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tavazzi L. Salerno JA, Bobba P: Meccanismo e implicazioni cliniche degli emiblocchi e dei blocchi di branca intermittenti. Boll Soc Ital Cardiol XXXV Italian Meeting of Cardiology, 1974 p 235Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masoni A, Tomasi AM, Alboni P: Terapia paradossa dei blocchi in fase 3. VI National Meeting ANMCO, Verona, 1975, p 325Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Sherif N, Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R: Bradycardi“a-dependent conduction disorders. J Electrocardiol 9: 1, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Motte G, Fabiato A, Gorgon R, Abbaou C, Slama R: Les blocs de branche paradoussaux. Arch Mal Coeur 63, 571, 1970Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elizari MV, Lazzari JO, Rosenbaum MB: Phase 3 and phase 4 intermittent left anterior hemiblock. Chest 62: 673, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kretz A, Da Ruos O, Leguizamon P, Alumbo RJ: Delay and block of cardiac impulse caused by enhanced phase 4 depolarization in the His-Purkinje system. Br Heart J 37: 136, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salerno JA, Tavazzi L, Angoli L, Mussini A, Tronconi L: Phase 3 and phase 4 intermittent intraventricular conduction disturbances. VI European Meeting of Cardiology ( Abstr. ), Madrid, 1972Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elizari MV, Lazzari JO, Rosenbaum MB: Phase 3 and phase 4 intermittent left bundle branch block occurring spontaneously in a dog. Europ J Cardiol 1: 95, 1973Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tavazzi L, Salerno J: Disturbi della conduzione intraventricolare in fase 3 e in fase 4 coesistenti. G Ital Cardiol 3: 530, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Motte G, Desoutter P, Fournial C, Welti JJ: Bloc en phase 3 et en phase 4 de la branche gauche du faisceau de His et conduction uniquement en phase supernormale dans la branche droite. Arch Mal Coeur 70: 789, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watanabe Y, Nishimura M: Terminology and electrophysiologic concepts in cardiac arrhythmias. V. Phase 3 block and phase 4 block. Part 1. Pace 2: 335, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watanabe Y, Nishimura M: Terminology and electrophysiologic concepts in cardiac arrhythmias. VI. Phase 3 block and phase 4 block. Part. 2. Pace 2: 624, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lie KI, Wellens HJ, Schuilenburg RM, Durrer D: Mechanism and significance of widened QRS complexes during complete atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 33: 833, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen HC, D’Cruz I, Arbel ER, Langerdorf R, Pick A: Tachycardia-and bradycardia-dependent bundle branch block alternans Clinical observations. Circulation 55: 242, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El-Sherif N: Tachycardia-dependent versus bradycardia-dependent intermittent bundle branch block. Br Heart J 34: 167, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenbaum MB: The significance of phase 4 depolarization for clinical electrocardiography. Europ J Cardiol 3: 253, 1975Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Girotti AL, Halpern MS, Elizari MV, Rosenbaum MB: Electrophysiologic and pharmacologie studies in a patient with acute myocardial infarction complicated by intraventricular and atrioventricular block. Europ J Cardiol 3: 281, 1975Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen HC, D’Cruz IA, Pick A: Effects of stable and changing rates and premature ventricular beats on transient tachycardia-, pseudobradycardia-and bradycardia-dependent bundle branch block alternans. J Electrocardiol 12: 151, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hodgkin AL, Keynes RO: Movement of cations during recovery in nerve. J Physiol 128: 61. 1955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hodgkin AL, Keynes RD: The potassium permeability of a giant nerve fiber. J Physiol 128: 61, 1955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Draper MH, Weidman S• Cardiac resting and action potentials recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol 115: 74, 1951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reuter H: Divalent cations as charge carriers in excitable membranes. In: Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, Butler JAV, Noble D. New York: Pergamon, 1973, p3Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McAllister RE, Noble O: The time and voltage dependence of the slow outward current in cardiac Purkinje fibers. J Physiol 186: 632, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weidman S: Resting and action potentials of cardiac muscle. Ann NY Acad Sci 65: 665. 1957Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Noble O, Tsien RW: The kinetics and rectifier properties of the slow potassium current in cardiac Purkinje fibers. J Physiol 195: 185, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosen MR: Electrophysiology of the cardiac specialized conduction system. In: His bundle electrocardiography and clinical electrophysiology, Narula OS. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1975, p19Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dominguez G, Fozzard HA: Influence of extracellular K+concentration on cable properties and excitability of sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 26: 565, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brooks CMcC, Hoffman BF, Suckling EE, Orias O: Excitability of the heart. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1955Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Elizari MV, Nau GJ, Levi RJ, Lazzar JO, Halpern MS, Rosenbaum MB: Experimental production of rate dependent bundle branch block in the canine heart. Circ Res 34: 730, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lazzara R, El-Sherif N, Scherlag BJ: Disorders of cellular electrophysiology produced by ischemia of the canine His bundle. Circ Res 36: 444, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trautwein W, Gottstein V, Dudel J: Der Aktionsstrom der Myokardfaser in Sauerstoffmangel. Pflüger Arch 260: 40, 1954Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Friedman PL, Stewart JR, Fenoglio JJ: Survival of subendocardial Purkinje fibers after extensive myocardial infarction in dogs. In vivo and in vitro correlations. Circ Res 33: 597, 1973Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lazzara R, El-Sherif N, Scherlag BJ: Electrophysiological properties of canine Purkinje cells in one-day-old myocardial infarction. Circ Res 33: 722, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fabiato A, Corabgeuf E: Facteurs cellulaires de désynchronisation électrique ventriculaire: étude sur le coeur isolé de lapin dans des conditions de perfusion normale et de dépolarisation partielle. J Physiol (Paris) 61: 277, 1969Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cranefield PF, Klein HO, Hoffman BF: Conduction of cardiac impulse: I. Delay, block and one way block in depressed Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 28: 199, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Surawicz B, Uhley N, Borun R, Laks M, Crevassel, Rosen K, Nelson W, Mandel W, Lawrence P, Jackson L, Flowers N, Clifton J, Greenfield J Jr, Robles de Medina E: Task Force I: Standardization of terminology and interpretation. Am J Cardiol 41: 130, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Elizari MV, Novakosky A, Quintero RA, Levi RJ, Lazzar JO, Rosenbaum MB: The experimental evidence for the role of phase 3 and phase 4 block in the genesis of AV conduction disturbances. In: The conduction system of the heart. Structure, function and clinical implications, Wellens HJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1976, p 360Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van Dam RT, Hoore EN, Hoffman BF: Initiation and conduction of impulses in partially depolarized fibers. Am J Physiol 204: 1133, 1963Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mendez C, Erli JD, Moe GK: Indirect action of epinephrine on intraventricular conduction time. Circ Res 14: 318, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Comeau WJ, Hamilton JGM, White PD: Paroxysmal bundle branch block associated with heart disease: a review and an analysis of the literature, with thirteen new cases and notes upon the influence of the vagus. Am Heart J 15: 276, 1938Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dressler W: Transient bundle branch block occurring during slowing of the heart beat and following gagging. Am Heart J 58: 760, 1969Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tavazzi L, Salerno JA, Chimienti M, Ray M, Bobba P: Mecanismos electrofisiologicos de los bloqueos A-V paroxisticos. In: Diagnostico y tratamiento de las arritmias cardiacas, Bayes A, Cosin J. Barcelona: Doyoma, 1978, p 343Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bailey JC, Greenspan K, Elizari MV, Anderson G, Fisch C: Effects of acetylcholine on automaticity and conduction in the proximal portion of the His-Purkinje specialized conduction system. Circ Res 30: 210, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Danilo P, Rosen MR, Hordof AJ: Effects of acetylcholine on the ventricular specialized conduction system of neonatal and adult dogs. Circ Res 43: 777, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Martins JB, Zipes DP: Effects of sympathetic and vagal nerves on recovery properties of the endocardium and epicardium of the canine left ventricle. Circ Res 46: 100, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hoffman BF: Neural influences on cardiac electrical activity and rhythm. In: Neural regulation of the heart, Randall WC. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977, p 289Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gadsby DC, Wit AL, Cranefield PF: The effects of acetylcholine on the electrical activity of canine cardiac Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 43: 29, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosen MR, Hoffman BF: Vagus and ventricles. Circ Res 42: 1, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jonas EA, Kosowsky BD, Ramaswamy K: Complete His-Purkinje block produced by carotid sinus massage. Report of a case. Circulation 50: 192, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Vessel H, Lowen G: Bundle branch block on cardiac slowing at a critical slow heart rate. Am Heart J 66: 329, 1963Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pick A: Aberrant ventricular conduction of escaped beats. Preferential and accessory pathways in the A-V junction. Circulation 13: 702, 1956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Chiale P, Levi RJ, Nau GJ, Halpern MS, Lazzari JO, Novakovsky A: Relationships between increased automaticity and depressed conduction in the main intraventricular conducting fascicles of the human and canine heart. Circulation 49: 818, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tajima R, Nakamura Y, Murata K: Rate related block in the canine His-Purkinje system after ligation of the anterior septal artery. Observations by His bundle electrocardiography. Jap Circulation J 43: 403, 1979Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rosenbaum MB, Lazzari JO, Elizari MV: The role of phase 3 and phase 4 block in clinical electrocardiography. In: The conduction system of the heart. Structure, function and clinical implications, Wellens HJJ, Lie Ki, Janse MJ. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1976, p 126Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Goudaux JL, Ashman R: Auricular fibrillation with aberration simulating ventricular paroxysmal tachycardia. Am Heart J 34: 366, 1947Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Katz AM, Pick A: The transeptal conduction time in the human heart. An evaluation of fusion beats in ventricular parasystole. Circulation 27: 1961, 1963Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moe GK, Mendez C, Han J: Aberrant A-V impulse propagation in the dog heart: a study of functional bundle branch block. Circ Res 16: 261, 1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Castellanos A Jr, Agha AS, Befeler B, Castillo CA, Berkovitz BV: A study of arrival of excitation at selected ventricular sites during human bundle branch block using close bipolar catheter electrodes. Chest 63: 208, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra R, Pietras RJ, Rosen KM: The effects of cycle length on cardiac refractory periods in man. Circulation 49: 32, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Neuss H. Thormann J, Schleppep M: Electrophysiological findings in frequency-dependent left bundle branch block. Br Heart J 36: 888, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Spear JF, Moore EN: Supernormal excitability and conduction. In: The conduction system of the heart. Structure, function and clinical implications, Wellens KJJ, Lie KI, Janse MI. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1976, p 111Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cabasson J, Morena H, Guimond, G, Deceuninck P, Gagne J, Cinca J, Rocca J, Sassine A, Masse C, Puech P: La phase supernormale de conduction cardiaque. Etude expérimentale chez le chien. Arch Mal Coeur 71: 691, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Puech P, Guimond C, Nadeau R, Morena H, Molinal, Matina D: Supernormal conduction in the intact heart. In Cardiac arrhythmias. Electrophysiology, diagnosis and management, Narula OS. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979, p 40Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Adrian ED, Lukas K: On the summation of propagated disturbances in nerve and muscle. J Physiol 44: 68, 1912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Weidmann S: Effects of calcium ions and local anesthetics on electrical properties of Purkinje fibers. J Physiol 129: 568, 1955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Spear JF, Moore EN: Effect of potassium on supernormal conduction in the bundle branch Purkinje system of the dog. Am J Cardiol 40: 923, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Spear JF, Moore EN: The effect of changes in rate and rhythm on supernormal excitability in the isolated Purkinje system of the dog. A possible role in re-entrant arrhythmias. Circulation 50: 1144, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Tavazzi L, Salerno JA, Bobba P: Intraventricular conduction in supernormal phase in intermittent bundle branch block. Circulation (Abstr.) 52 (I1): 248, 1975Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pellegrino L, Casari A, De Filippi R, Salerno JA: L’uso della xilocaina nelle aritmie cardiache associate a disturbi di conduzione. Boll Soc It Cardiol 15: 665, 1970Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Garashi M, Ayabe T: Quantitative study of the supernormal phase of ventricular excitability in man. Am J Cardiol 36: 292, 1975Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gallagher JJ, Damato AN, Varghese P, Caracta A, Josephson ME, Lau SH: Alternative mechanisms of apparent supernormal atrioventricular conduction. Am J Cardiol 31: 362, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Agha AS, Castellanos, A Jr, Wells D, Ross M, Befler B, Myerburg RJ: Type I, type II and type III Gaps in bundle branch conduction. Circulation 76: 325, 1973Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gallagher JJ, Damato AN, Caracta AR, Varghese Pi, Josephson ME, Lay SH: Gap in A-V conduction in man: types I and II. Am Heart J 85: 78, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cannom DS, Goodman DJ, Harrison DC: Electrophysiological studies in patients with rate related intermittent left bundle branch block. Br Heart J 36: 653, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, Amat-y-Leon F, Wyndham C, Rosen KM: Electrophysiological observations in patients with rate dependent bundle branch block. Circulation 51: 244, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Barnay C, Medwedowsky JL, Nicolai P, Delaahe M, Blache E: Phénomène de Gap et conduction supernormal au cours du bloc de branche gauche intermittent. Arch Mal Coeur 69: 681, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Damato AN, Akhtar M, Ruskin J, Caracta A. Lay SH: Gap phenomena: anterograde and retrograde. In: The conduction system of the heart. Structure, function and clinical implications, Wellens KJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1976, p 504Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Abate G, Zaca’F, Polimeni RM, Alberici S, Lenzi S: I Gaps anterogradi. G Ital Cardiol 8: 374, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Moe GK, Childers RW, Meredith J: An appraisal of `supernormal’ A-V conduction. Circulation 38: 5, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Moore EN, Spear JF: Experimental studies on the facilitation of A-V conduction by ectopic beats in dogs and rabbits. Circ Res 29: 29, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Schamroth L: Supernormal phase in hemiblock conduction. Br Heart J 38: 207. 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sciacca A, Sangiorgi M: Trombe de la conduction intraventriculaire droite due à la lésion du tronc commun du faisceau de His. Acta Cardiol 12: 486, 1957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Fabregas R, Tse W, Han J: Conduction disturbances of the bundle branches produced by lesions in the nonbranching portion of His bundle. Am Heart J 92: 356, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    El-Sherif N, Amat-y-Leon F, Schonfield C, Scherlag B, Rosen K, Lazzara R, Wyndham C: Normalization of bundle branch block patterns by distal His bundle pacing. Clinical and experimental dissociation in the pathologic His bundle. Circulation 57: 473, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Narula OS: Longitudinal dissociation in the His bundle. Bundle branch block due to asynchronous conduction within the His bundle in man Circulation 56: 996, 1977Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Massumi RA, Amsterdam EA, Mason DT: Phenomenon of supernormality in the human heart. Circulation 46: 264, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Goldenberg M, Rothberger CJ: Untersuchungen an der spezifischen Muskulatur des Hundenherzens. Z Ges Exp Med 90: 508, 1933Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cranefield PF, Hoffman BF: Conduction of the cardiac impulse. II. Summation and inhibition. Circ Res 28: 220, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Schamroth L, Friedberg HD: Wedensky facilitation and the Wedensky effect during high grade A-V block in the human heart. Am J Cardiol 23: 893, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Runge M, Narula OS: ‘Fatigue’ phenomenon in the His-Purkinje system (HPS). Circulation 48 (suppl IV): 102, 1973Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Narula OS, Runge M: Accommodation of A-V nodal conduction and fatigue phenomenon in the His-Purkinje system. In: The conduction system of the heart. Structure, function and clinical implications, Wellens HJJ, Lie KJ, Janse MJ. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1976, p 529Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Edmand RE, Greenspan K, Fisch C: Effect of cycle length alternation upon the configuration of the canine ventricular action potential. Circ Res 19: 602, 1966Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Salerno JA, Tavazzi L: Correlazioni tra automaticità e conduzione. Considerazioni su un caso di blocco di branca sinistro in fase 3 e in fase 4. G Ital Cardiol 6: 509, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Chiale PA, Przybylsky J, Lazzari JO, Elizari MV, Rosenbaum MB: Comparative effects of Ajmaline on intermittent bundle branch block and the Wolff-ParkinsonWhite syndrome. Am J Cardiol 39: 651, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Davies LD; Temte JV: Electrophysiological action of lidocaine on canine ventricular muscle and Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 24: 639, 1969Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bigger JT jr, Mandel WJ: Effect of lidocaine on conduction in canine Purkinje fibers and at the ventricular muscle-Purkinje fiber junction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 172: 239, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Biggert JT jr, Mandel WJ: Effect of lidocaine on the electrophysiological properties of ventricular muscle and Purkinje fibers. J Clin Invest 49: 63, 1970Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rosen MR, Hoffman BF: Mechanisms of action of antiarrhythmic drugs. Circ Res 32: 1, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Bauer GE: Transient bundle branch block. Circulation 29: 730, 1064.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Fisch C, Zipes DP, McHenry PL: Rate dependent aberrancy. Circulation 48: 714, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Luy G, Bahl O, Massie E: Intermittent left bundle branch block. A study of the effects of left bundle branch block on the electrocardiographic patterns of myocardial infarction and ischemia. Am Heart J 85: 332, 1973Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Denes P, Pick A, Miller RH, Pietras RJ, Rosen KM: A characteristic precordial repolarization abnormality in patients with intermittent left bundle branch block. Ann Intern Med 89: 55, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Engle TR, Shah R, De Podesta LA, Frankl WS, Krause RL: T-wave abnormalities of intermittent left bundle branch block. Ann Intern Med. 89: 204, 1978Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Abben R, Rosen KM, Denes P: Intermittent left bundle branch block: anatomic as reflected in the electrocardiogram during normal conduction. Circulation 59: 1040, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Boyadjian N, Van Dooren F: Raccourcissement des complexes QRS dans les blocks intraventriculaires suite aux modifications du rythme. Acta Cardiol 6: 254, 1951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Pick A: Aberrant ventricular conduction. The Heart Bulletin 8: 49, 1959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MU, Lazzari JO: The hemiblocks. Oldsmar: Tampa Tracings, 1970Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Chatterjee K, Harris AM, Davies JG, Leatham A: Electrocardiographic changes subsequent to artificial ventricular depolarization. Br Heart J 31: 770, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Gola E, Arosio G, Riva S, Rusconi C: Alterazioni della ripolarizzazione ventricolare correlate con l’elettrostimolazione endocavitaria destra. G Ital Cardiol 2: 257, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Antonioli GE, Alboni P, Baggioni GF, Fischer DM: Sulle alterazioni della ripolarizzazione nell’elettrocardiogramma spontaneo susseguente a stimolazione endocavitaria permanente. Cardiol Prat 25: 275, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Di Giglio VA: Reversible bundle branch block in a case of toxis goitre. Am Heart J 15: 116, 1938Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Bauer GE: Pulmonary embolism and pulmonary infarction. Med J Australia 1: 286, 1959Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Simonson E: Transient right bundle branch block produced by heart catheterization in man. Am Heart J 41: 217, 1951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Penaloza D, Gamboa R, Sime F: Experimental right bundle branch block in the normal human heart. Am J Cardiol 8: 767, 1961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Bristow JD, Kassebaum DG, Starr A, Griswold HE: Observations on the occurrence of right bundle branch block following repair of ventricular septal defect. Circulation 22: 896, 1960Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Barker PS, Johnston FD, Wilson FN: The effect of quinidine upon sinus tachycardia including the production of transient bundle branch block. Am Heart J 25: 760, 1943Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Wallace AG, Laszo J: Mechanisms influencing conduction in a case of intermittent bundle branch block. Am Heart J 61: 548, 1961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Shern MA, Rytand DA: Intermittent bundle branch block. Observations with special reference to the critical heart rate. Arch Intern Med 91: 448, 1953Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Alboni
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrophysiology Section, Division of CardiologyArcispedale S. AnnaFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations