Skip to main content

The Historical Dimension of Justice

  • Chapter
Social Justice
  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

Bertrand Russell once asked how we could tell that the world had not been created five minutes ago with all its historical “evidence” and all our apparent memories intact. The customary answer to Russell’s question is that we are indeed unable to know this, but that here, as elsewhere, our inability to defeat the skeptic has no practical significance. However, from the moral point of view, the truth of Russell’s hypothesis would make a great difference indeed. If there were no past, then our prisons would be filled with individuals who had not committed crimes and so did not deserve to be treated differently from the rest of humanity; persons with property would not be able to trace their claims to possessions to any legitimate acts of acquisition; and all claims to compensation for past wrongs would be dissolved in a single stroke. The resulting moral universe would perhaps have an attractive simplicity; but it would emphatically not be ours. Morally speaking, the past matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Immanuel Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, text and critical essays edited by Robert Paul Wolff, translated by Lewis White Beck (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969 ), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Nagel, “Moral Luck,” in his Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), p. 25. My discussion in this section has been influenced by Nagel’s essay at a number of points.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia ( New York: Basic Books, 1974 ), p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This device is presented, and its neutrality argued for, in John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971). However, for serious objections to its neutrality, see Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, pp. 198–204 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Randolph L. Braham

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sher, G. (1981). The Historical Dimension of Justice. In: Braham, R.L. (eds) Social Justice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8162-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8162-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8162-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics