Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in Applied Economics ((BSAE,volume 1))

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Xerox Corporation has one of the most advanced and fully rationalized education and training programs in American industry. With its rationale, structure, and mechanics of training as well articulated as those of any other American corporation’s training program, Xerox’s education and training strategy provides a good vehicle for inquiring into the utility of further study of training in industry. It also suggests the general direction in which corporate education and training is moving, the possible consequences for the public and private educational system, and the limitations that corporations’ information will impose on further study.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Information about Xerox’s training programs was obtained through interviews with corporate training officials and internal company documents.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xerox Corporation, 1978 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. There are some methodological problems in such comparisons of spending. Does total revenue measure an equivalent aspect of business, for these purposes, as between Xerox, which derives a significant portion of its income from leased equipment, and GM, which sells almost all of its product, and AT&T, which sells mainly services? Would the comparison change if trainee salaries were included? Xerox officials noted that including salaries might increase their estimate of spending three to five times. Further, does it make any difference in the comparisons that Xerox’s training costs include a large expenditure for technical manuals (“documentation”)?

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seymour Lusterman, Education in Industry (New York: Conference Board, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Peter B. Doeringer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dinkelspiel, J.R. (1981). Education and Training Programs at Xerox. In: Doeringer, P.B. (eds) Workplace Perspectives on Education and Training. Boston Studies in Applied Economics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8144-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8144-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8146-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8144-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics