Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in Applied Economics ((BSAE,volume 1))

Abstract

Examining the conceptual basis under which training occurs in industry involves the consideration of who gains from such training and who pays, as well as the conditions that ensure an optimal quantity and structure of training. The analysis of these factors then provides a rationale (or several rationales) for social intervention in the occupational training process as provided by private sector firms. This examination also attempts to quantify the nature and extent of training in industry and the level and distribution of the costs of such training. The following conclusions can be anticipated:

  1. There are a variety of conditions under which it is socially justified for government to influence the extent and nature of occupational training in industry.

  2. The existing evidence does not tell us and is not likely to tell us in the near future the optimal nature or extent of social intervention in the process of occupational training in the private sector of industry.

  3. Even the nature, level, and composition of training in private industry, as well as its costs, are not well documented or clearly understood. To suggest that the relevant descriptive data, much less data that would allow careful structural analysis, are fragmentary is a major understatement. But, of course, an appropriate intervention strategy ultimately must be based on the evidence of sound information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ralph K. Scott, “Management’s Dilemma: To Train or Not to Train People,” Training and Development Journal 32, no. 2 (February 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas F. Gilbert, “Training: The $100 Billion Opportunity,” Training and Development Journal 30, no. 11 (November 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seymour Lusterman, Education in Industry (New York: Conference Board, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob Mincer, “On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns and Some Implications,” Journal of Political Economy 70, no. 5, Part 2, Supplement (October 1962). A rough estimate of the total money value of wage income was made by subtracting interest paid and transfers from disposable personal income

    Google Scholar 

  5. see Economic Report of the President (: Gov’t. Printing Office, January 1979), p. 192, Table B-8. Two main reasons that this ratio could be underestimated are that the Mincer estimate itself may underestimate forgone earnings due to on-the-job training and that the structure of the economy most surely has changed since 1958. If the economy has become characterized by a more highly skilled labor force, the proportion of on-the-job training likely will have increased over time, since higher levels of formal training and skill result in increased on-the-job training.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lester C. Thurow, (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gary S. Becker, “Investment in On-the-Job Training,” in Mark Blaug, ed., Economics of Education 1 (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1968), originally published in Becker, Human Capital (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), Chap. 2 Sherwin Rosen, “Learning and Experience in the Labor Market,” Journal of Human Resources 7, no. 3 (Summer 1972) and Sherwin Rosen, “Learning by Experience as Joint Production,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 86, no. 3 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thurow, Investment in Human Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mincer, “On-the-Job Training.”

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen, “Learning and Experience in the Labor Market.”

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thurow, Investment in Human Capital, p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thurow, Investment in Human Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lusterman, Education in Industry, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.S. Eckaus, “Comments on Becker’s Analysis of On-the-Job Training,” in Blaug, Economics of Eduction I, originally published in Journal of Political Economy 71, no. 3 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Peter B. Doeringer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stromsdorfer, E.W. (1981). Training in Industry. In: Doeringer, P.B. (eds) Workplace Perspectives on Education and Training. Boston Studies in Applied Economics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8144-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8144-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8146-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8144-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics