Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nijenrode Studies in Business ((NSIB,volume 6))

Abstract

One of the important criticisms of the variance-covariance concept of risk is that it does not adequately describe manager’s risk preferences and risk-evaluation procedures. Good examples of this kind of criticism are found in Mao [21] and in Machol and Lerner [20]. They argue instead for a kind of “failure risk” concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderfer, C.P., and Bierman, H., Jr. “Choices with Risk: Beyond the Mean and Variance,” Journal of Business 43 (July 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barron, F.H. “A Chance Constrained Optimization Model for Risk,” OMEGA 1 (June 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barron, F.H. “The Potential Adopter’s Decision Rule: A Constrained Optimization Model of Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1970; see Dissertation Abstracts 31, No. 10 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barron, F.H., and Joy, O.M. “A Behavioral Model for Risky Decisions,” Journal of Business Administration (Fall 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barron, F.H., and Mackenzie, K.D. “A Constrained Optimization Model of Risky Decision,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 10 (February 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, S.W., and Brownson, F.O. “What Price Ambiguity? Or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision Making,” Journal of Political Economy 72 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W. “Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints,” Operations Research 11 (January-February 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conrath, D.W. “From Statistical Decision Theory to Practice: Some Problems with the Transition,” Management Science 19 (April 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coombs, C.H.; Bezembinder, T.G.; and Goode, F.M. “Testing Expectation Theories of Decision Making without Measuring Utility or Subjective Probability,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyckman, T.R., and Salomon, R. “Empirical Utility Functions and Random Devices: An Experiment,” Decision Sciences 3 (April 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellsberg, D. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grether, D.N., and Plott, C. R. “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon,” American Economic Review (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness,” Cognitive Psychology 3 (July 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laughhunn, D.J., and Sprecher, C. R. “Probability of Loss and the Capital Asset Pricing Model,” Financial Management 6 (Spring 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Libby, R., and Fishburn, P.C. “Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decisions: A Survey and Evaluation,” Journal of Accounting Research 15 (Autumn 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P. Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lichtenstein, S.; Slovic, P.; and Zink, D. “Effect of Instruction in Expected Value on Optimality of Gambling Decisions, ” Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lorie, J.H., and Savage, L.J. “Three Problems in Rationing Capital,” Journal of Business 28 (October 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luce, R.D., and Raiffa, H. Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Machol, R.E., and Lerner, E.M. “Risk, Ruin and Investment Analysis,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 4 (December 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mao, J.C.T. “Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory and Practice,” Journal of Finance 25 (May 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Payne, J.W. “Alternative Approaches to Decision Making under Risk: Moments versus Risk Dimensions,” Psychological Bulletin 80 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Savage, L.J. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schenkerman, S. “Constrained Decision Criteria,” Decision Sciences 6 (January 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tversky, A. “Intransitivity of Preferences, ” Psychological Review 61 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers,” Psychological Bulletin 76 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joy, O.M., Barron, F.H. (1981). Behavioral Risk Constraints in Investment Analysis. In: Derkinderen, F.G.J., Crum, R.L. (eds) Risk, Capital Costs, and Project Financing Decisions. Nijenrode Studies in Business, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8129-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8129-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8131-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8129-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics