Productivity Measurement at the Firm Level

A Brief Survey
  • Irving H. Siegel
Part of the Studies in Productivity Analysis book series (SPAN, volume 3)

Abstract

Like the lay public and the media, the business community tends to use the term productivity loosely. Nevertheless, many firms do—as many more should and will—show an interest in tracking their own performance in accord with the familiar professional definition. This definition is broad. It admits a wide variety of measures even though it excludes many concepts that also are germane to the monitoring and analysis of company achievement.

Keywords

Income Expense Posites Univer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balk, W. L., and J. M. Shafritz, eds., 1975, Public Utility Productivity: Management and Measurement, Albany: New York State Department of Public Service (August).Google Scholar
  2. Bernolak, Imre, 4“Enhancement of Productivity through Interfirm Comparison, a Canadian Experience,” in National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life, 1976, pp. 59–65.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, Joseph J., 1973, “Measuring Productivity,” Arthur Andersen Chronicle 33, no. 2: 8–18.Google Scholar
  4. Cocks, Douglas L., 1974, “The Measurement of Total Factor Productivity for a Large U.S. Manufacturing Corporation,” Business Economics 9, no. 4: 7–20.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, Charles E., and R. Clark Harris, 1973, “Total Productivity Measurement at the Firm Level,” Sloan Management Review 14, no. 3: 13–29.Google Scholar
  6. Financial Accounting Standards Board, 1979, “Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, No. 33: Financial Reporting and Changing Prices,” Stamford, Conn. ( September ).Google Scholar
  7. Gantz, Marvin E., Jr., 1976, “Productivity Measurement at Alcoa,” in National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life, 1976, pp. 3, 44.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, Leon, 1973, A Practical Guide to Productivity Measurement, Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  9. Heyworth, Geoffrey, 1951, “Productivity,” Advanced Management 16, no. 3: 14–18.Google Scholar
  10. Joint Financial Management Improvement Program, 1977, Implementing a Productivity Program: Points to Consider, Washington, D.C.: Gov’t. Printing Office (March).Google Scholar
  11. Kendrick, John W., and Daniel Creamer, 1965. Measuring Company Productivity, New York: Conference Board.Google Scholar
  12. Klotz, Benjamin, Rey Madoo, and Reed Hansen, 1980, “A Study of High and Low ’Labor Productivity’ in U.S. Manufacturing,” in J. W. Kendrick and B. N. Vaccara, eds., New Developments in Productivity Measurement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kraus, Jerome, 1978, “Productivity and Profit Models of the Firm,” Business Economics 13, no. 4: 10–14.Google Scholar
  14. Mark, Jerome A., and Charles W. Ardolini, 1974, 4“Developments in Measuring Productivity in the Federal Sector,” in 1974 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 236–45.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, Brian, 1975, A Plant-Wide Productivity Plan in Action: Three Years of Experience with the Scanlon Plan, Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Productivity and Work Quality (May).Google Scholar
  16. National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life, 1975, Improving Productivity: A Description of Selected Company Programs, Series 1, Washington, D.C.: Gov’t. Printing Office (December).Google Scholar
  17. National Center for Productivity and Quality of working Life, 1976, Improving Productivity through Industry and Company Measurement, Series 2, Washington, D.C.: Gov’t. Printing Office (October).Google Scholar
  18. Panel to Review Productivity Statistics, 1979, Measurement and Interpretation of Productivity, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. Peck, Gerald E., 1976, “Measurement of Warehousing Productivity,” in National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life, 1976, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  20. Pratten, C. F., 1976a, A Comparison of the Performance of Swedish and U.K. Companies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pratten, C. F., 1976b, Labour Productivity Differentials within International Companies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sherrard, William R., 1967, “Labor Productivity for the Firm,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 7, no. 1: 49–61.Google Scholar
  23. Siegel, Irving H., 1976, “Measurement of Company Productivity,” in National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life, 1976, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, Irving H., 1980a, Company Productivity: Measurement for Improvement, Kalamazoo, Mich.: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research (April).Google Scholar
  25. Siegel, Irving H., 1980fc, “Comments on Klotz-Hansen-Madoo Paper,” in New Developments in Productivity Measurement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Civil Service Commission, General Accounting Office and Office of Management and Budget, 1972, Measuring and Enhancing Productivity in the Federal Sector, Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress (August 4 ).Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Department of Energy, 1978a, Voluntary Business Energy Conservation Program, Progress Report No. 6, Washington, D.C.: Gov’t. Printing Office (April).Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Energy, 1978, Annual Report: Industrial Energy Efficiency Program, 2 vols., Washington, D.C.: Gov’t. Printing Office (June).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irving H. Siegel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations