Advertisement

Normal Binocular Vision

  • R. A. Crone
Part of the Monographs in Ophthalmology book series (MIOP, volume 6)

Abstract

All vertebrates have two eyes. They are thus able to observe a wider panorama than would be the case if they had only one. Binocular vision also offers a second advantage, namely depth perception. This “stereoscopic vision” arises from the fact that the two eyes observe the world from slightly different positions. Panoramic vision and stereoscopic vision involve conflicting requirements. For the widest panorama, the visual fields of the two eyes must meet, but without overlapping. Depth perception in as large as possible an area of the visual field, by contrast, requires that the visual fields overlap as far as possible. Some animals have opted for panoramic binocular vision and thus for laterally positioned eyes. These are mainly the herbivores, which need to escape as soon as they scent danger in their surroundings. Other species have abandoned panoramic vision in favor of depth perception in as large a binocular field of vision as possible; their eyes have adopted a frontal position. This group consists mainly of predatory animals, which must be able to accurately estimate the distance to their prey, and tree-dwelling species, which need to know how far it is to the next branch if they are to jump successfully. Among the animal species, the apes have the most highly developed visual co-ordination of front leg movements.

Keywords

Receptive Field Depth Perception Binocular Vision Lateral Geniculate Body Stereoscopic Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. (1).
    Bishop, P.O. — Binocular vision. In: Adler’s physiology of the eye: clinical application. 7th ed. (Ed. Moses, R.A.), 575–649, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Bishop, P.O. — Stereopsis and the random element in the organization of the striate cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 204, 1979, 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Crone, R.A. — Diplopia. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Crone, R. A., Leuridan, O. — Tolerance for aniseikonia I. Diplopia thresholds in the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch. klin. exp. Ophthal., 1973, 188, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N. — Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J. Compar. Neurol., 1974, 158, 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Jampel, R.S. — Representation of the near response on the cerebral cortex of the macaque. Amer. J. Ophthal, 1959, 48, 573–581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Julesz, B. — Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Maillette de Buy Wenniger-Prick, L.J.J.M. — Binoculair zien bij microstrabismus. Thesis, Amsterdam, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Ogle, K.N. — Researches in binocular vision. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Comp., 1950.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Shipley, T., Rawlings, S.C. — The nonius horopter. Vision Res., 1970, 10, 1225–1299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Szentágothai, J. — The local neuronal apparatus of the cerebral cortex. In: Cerebral correlates of conscious experience. Buser, P., Buser, A. (eds.), 131–138. Amsterdam, Elsevier Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Whitteridge, D. — The Bowman lecture 1977: The cortical contribution to binocular vision. Trans. Ophthal Soc. U.K., 1977, 97, 39–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Belgian Society of Ophthalmology, Leuven, Belgium 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Crone
    • 1
  1. 1.Academic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations