Advertisement

Growth, condition and gonad development of bream (Abramis brama L.) in relation to its feeding conditions in Tjeukemeer

  • E. H. R. R. Lammens
Chapter
  • 72 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 11)

Abstract

The bream (Abramis brama L.) population of Tjeukemeer was studied for three successive years. The growth, condition, gonad development, diet and feeding conditions of the fish are described. Food competition for two years with the then abundant young planktivorous smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) resulted in a decreased growth rate, condition and gonad development of the larger bream. The biomass of chironomids was too small in relation to that of the zooplankton to be important for the bream population, although they were eaten more efficiently.

Keywords

bream growth condition fecundity zooplankton chironomids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alm, G., 1959. Connection between maturity, size and age in fishes. Inst. Freshwater Res., Drottingholm Rep. No. 40.Google Scholar
  2. Backiel, T., Zawisza, J., 1968. Synopsis of biological data on the bream, Abramis brama L. FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 36.Google Scholar
  3. Bagenal, T. B., 1968. Eggs and early life history. In: Ricker, W. E. (Ed.) I.B.P. Handbook No. 3. Methods of Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters, Chap. 7. Blackwell, Oxford. 159 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Beattie, D. M., Golterman, H. L., Vijverberg, J., 1978. An introduction to the limnology of the Friesian Lakes. Hydrobiologia 58: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beattie, D. M., 1982. Distribution and production of the larval chironomid populations in Tjeukemeer. Hydrobiologia, this volume.Google Scholar
  6. Cazemier, W. G., 1975. Onderzoek naar de oorzaken van groeiverschillen bij brasem (Abramis brama L.) (A study concerning the causes of differences in growth rate of bream). Visserij 28: 197–207.Google Scholar
  7. Densen, W. L. T. van (in prep.). The ecology of 0+ fish in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. II. Feeding behaviour.Google Scholar
  8. Densen, W. L. T. van, Vijverberg, J., 1982. The relations between 0+ fish density, zooplankton size and the vulnerability of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca, to angling in the Frisian lakes. Hydrobiologia 95: 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fanget, R., 1972. Contribution à l’ecologie des étangs piscicoles de la Dombes: sur le régime alimentaire de la carpe à miroir, Cyprinus carpio 1. Thèse Univ. Sei. Lyon. pp. 62, annexes.Google Scholar
  10. Geyer, F., 1939. Alter und Wachstum der wichtigsten Cypriniden Ostholsteinische Seen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 34: 543–644.Google Scholar
  11. Goldspink, C. R., 1978. The population density, growth rate and production of bream, Abramis brama L., in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. J. Fish. Biol. 13: 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hazelzet, J. C. A. M., 1972. The bream population of the Tjeukemeer. Internal Report ( 1972-3 ), Limnological Institute, Oosterzee, The Netherlands. 96 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, G. E., 1957. A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. I. Wiley, New York. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Ivlev, V. S., 1961. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven. 302 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Kott, P., 1953. Modified whirling apparatus for sub-sampling of plankton. Aust. J. mar. freshwat. Res. 4: 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuznetsov, V. A., 1973. The fecundity and quality of eggs of bream (Abramis brama L.). J. Ichthyol. 13: 669–677.Google Scholar
  17. Lammens, E. H. R. R. (in prep.). The food and feeding of the bream (Abramis brama) in Tjeukemeer in relation to size, site, season and time of the day.Google Scholar
  18. Laskar, K., 1948. Die Ernahrung des Brassens (Abramis brama L.) im eutrophen See. Arch. Hydrobiol. 42: 1–165.Google Scholar
  19. LeCren, E. D., 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch (Perca fluviatilis L.). J. Anim. Ecol. 20: 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leenen, J. D., 1982. Hydrology of Tjeukemeer. Hydrobiologia 95: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundbeck, J., 1926. Die bodentierwelt Norddeutscher Seen. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 7: 1–473.Google Scholar
  22. Nie, H. W. de, 1982. A note on the significance of larger bivalve molluscs (Anodonta spp. and Dreissena sp.) in the food of the eel (Anguilla anguilla) in Tjeukemeer. Hydrobiologia 95: 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ricker, W. E., 1973. Linear regressions in fishery research. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30: 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsyplakov, E. P., 1969. Variation in reproduction of the bream (Abramis brama L.) population in the Kuybyshev reservoir. J. Ichthyol. 9: 66–75.Google Scholar
  25. Uribe-Zamora, M., 1975. Selection des proies par le filtre branchial de la carpe à miroir (Cyprinus carpio L.). Thèse Univ. Sci. Lyon. 127 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Vasilchenko, O. N., 1970. The fecundity and the state of the gonads of common carp and bream used for breeding in the Volga Delta. J. Ichthyol. 10: 67–76.Google Scholar
  27. Vijverberg, J., Frank, Th. H., 1976. The chemical composition and the energy contents of copepods and cladocerans in relation to their size. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 333–345.Google Scholar
  28. Volodin, V. M., 1979. The influence of feeding and overwintering conditions on the duration of egg resorption and the development of the next generation of oocytes in the bream, Abramis brama, of Rybink reservoir. J. Ichthyol. 19: 147–151.Google Scholar
  29. Winberg, G. G.(Ed.) and collaborators, 1971. Symbols, units and conversion factors in studies of freshwater productivity. I.B.P. Central Office, London. 23 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. H. R. R. Lammens
    • 1
  1. 1.Tjeukemeer LaboratoryLimnological InstituteOosterzeeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations