Advertisement

Population dynamics and production of Acanthocyclops robustus (Sars) and Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) in Tjeukemeer

  • J. Vijverberg
  • A. F. Richter
Chapter
  • 69 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 11)

Abstract

The population dynamics and production ecology of the two dominant copepod species, Acanthocyclops robustus and Mesocyclops leuckarti, in Tjeukemeer (The Netherlands) were studied for three successive years. Since copopods in Tjeukemeer show continuous recruitment, a population dynamics model ‘INSTAR’ was developed and used to integrate field data on population density, population structure and fecundity and laboratory data on development rates and length-weight relationships. The pattern of size specific mortality indicated that both invertebrate and vertebrate predation were important in the regulation of population numbers.

Keywords

population dynamics secondary production cyclopoid copepods simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argentesi, F. R., Bernardi, R. de and Di Cola, G., 1974. Mathematical models for the analysis of population dynamics in species with continuous recruitment. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 31: 245–275.Google Scholar
  2. Beattie, D. M., Bromley, H. J., Chambers, M., Goldspink, C. R., Vijverberg, J., Zalingen, N. P. van and Golterman, H. L., 1972. Limnoligical studies on Tjeukemeer, a typical Dutch ‘polder reservoir’. In: Kajak, Z. and Hillbricht-Illkowska, A. (Eds.) Productivity Problems of Freshwaters, pp. 421–447. Proceedings of an IBP UNESCO Symposium on Productivity Problems of Freshwaters Kazimierz Dolny, Poland.Google Scholar
  3. Bernardi, R. deand DiCola, G., 1976. Instantaneous growth rates and production estimation in natural Zooplankton populations. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 33: 105–123.Google Scholar
  4. Bosselman, S., 1975. Population dynamics of Eudiaptomus graciloides in Lake Esrom. Arch. Hydrobiol. 75: 329–346.Google Scholar
  5. Brandl, Z. B. and Fernando, C. H., 1975. Food consumption and utilization in two freshwater cyclopoid copepods (Mesocyclops edax and Cyclops vicinus). Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 60: 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremer, P. and Vijverberg, J., 1982. Production, population biology and diet of Neomysis integer (Leach) in a shallow Frisian Lake (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 93: 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgis, M. J., 1971. The ecology and production of copepods, particularly Thermocyclops hyalinus, in the tropical Lake George, Uganda. Freshwat. Biol. 1: 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgis, M. J., 1974. Revised estimates for the biomass and production of Zooplankton in Lake George, Uganda. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgis, M. J., 1975. The biomass of cyclopoids in two Thames Valley reservoirs. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 19: 1834–1840.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, C. W., 1979. Population dynamics and production of Boeckella dilatata (Copepoda, Calanoida) in Lake Hayes, New Zealand. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 54: 409–465.Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, A., 1973. Calamoecia lucasi (Copepoda, Calanoida) and other zooplankters in two Rotorua, New Zealand, lakes. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 58: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corkett, C. D. and McLaren, I. A., 1978. The biology of Pseudo-calanus. Adv. mar. Biol. 15: 1–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, K. W., Costa, R. R., Rowe, R. E., Moshiri, G. A., Scanion, R. M. and Zajdel, R. K., 1969. Ecological energetics of a natural population of the predaceous zooplankter Lep- todora kindtii Focke (Cladocera). Oikos 20: 189–223.Google Scholar
  14. Densen, W. L. T. van, 1973. Populatiedynamika en produktie van de spiering, Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus, in het Friese merengebied. Student Report 1973-6, Limnological Institute, Nieuwersluis/Oosterzee, The Netherlands, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Densen, W. L. T. van, 1978. Food of young-of-the-year fish in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the Zodiac Symposium on Adaptation, pp. 131–132. PUDOC, Wage- ningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. Densen, W. L. T. van. The ecology of 0+ fish in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. II. Feeding behaviour. In prep.Google Scholar
  17. Densen, W. L. T. van. The ecology of 0+ fish in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. I. Population densities, growth and production. In prep.Google Scholar
  18. Eckstein, H., 1964. Untersuchungen über den einflusz des Rheinwassers auf die Limnologie des Schluchsees. IV. Untersuchungen über die Einbürgerung des Eudiaptomus gracilis Sars in den Schluchsee. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 28: 119–182.Google Scholar
  19. Edmondson, W. T., 1960. Reproductive rates of rotifers in natural populations. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 12: 21–77.Google Scholar
  20. Edmondson, W. T., 1974. Secondary production. Mitt. int. Verein Limnol. 20: 229–272.Google Scholar
  21. George, D. G., 1976. Life-cycle and production of Cyclops vicinus in a shallow eutrophic reservoir. Oikos 27: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldspink, C. R., 1978. The population density, growth rate and production of bream, Abramis brama, in Tjeukemeer, the Netherlands. J. Fish Biol. 13: 499–517.Google Scholar
  23. Gophen, M., 1976. Temperature effect on lifespan, metabolism, and development time of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus). Oecologia 25: 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, J. D., 1976. Population dynamics and production of the calanoid copepod Calamoecia lucasi in a northern New Zealand lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 50: 313–400.Google Scholar
  25. Hogeweg, P. and Richter, A. F., 1982. INSTAR, a discrete event-oriented model for simulating zooplankton population dynamics. Hydrobiologia 95: 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphreys, W. F., 1979. Production and respiration in animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 427–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchinson, G. E., 1957. A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. I. Wiley, New York. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Ivanova, M. V., 1973. Growth patterns of copepod crustaceans (in Russian). Hydrobiol. J. 9: 15–21.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, R. P. W. M. and Bouwhuis, A. M. J., 1979. The year cycle of Eudiaptomus vulgaris (Schmeil, 1896) (Copepoda, Calanoida) in a small, acid water body during 1973. Development in the natural habitat and relationships between temperature and duration of developmental stages. Hydro-biologia 64: 17–36.Google Scholar
  30. Jamieson, C. D., 1980. Observations on the effect of diet and temperature on rate of development of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) (Copepoda,Cyclopoida). Crustaceana 38: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, J. K. and Miller, C. B., 1974. Dynamics of isolated plankton populations in Yaquina Bay, Oregon. Oregon State Univ. Eng. Exp. Sta. Cire. 46: 27–35.Google Scholar
  32. Katona, S. K., 1971. Ecological studies on some planctonic marine copepods. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University. 145 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Kibby, H. V., 1971. Energetics and population dynamics of Diaptomus gracilis. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lair, N., 1978. Repartition spatio-temporelle, biomasse et production des population zooplanctoniques du lac d’Aydat en periode estivale. Hydrobiologia 61: 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lammens, E. H. R. R., 1982. Growth and diet of the bream, (Abramis brama) in relation to its feeding conditions in Tjeukemeer. Hydrobiologia 95: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Landry, M. R., 1978. Population dynamics of production of a planktonic marine copepod, Acartia clausii, in a small temperate lagoon on San Juan Island, Washington. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 63: 77–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lévêque, C., Carmouze, J. P., Dejoux, C., Durand, J. R.,Gras, R., Iltis, A., Lemoalle, J., Loubens, G., Lauzanne, L., Saint- Jean, L., 1972. Recherches sur les biomasses et la productivité du lac Tchad. In: Kajak, Z. and Hillbricht-Illkowska, A. (Eds.) Productivity Problems of Freshwaters, pp. 421–447. Proceedings of an IPB-UNESCO Symposium on Productivity Problems of Freshwaters. Kazimierz Dolny, Poland.Google Scholar
  38. McQueen, D. J., 1969. Reduction of zooplankton standing stocks by predaceous Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi in Marion Lake, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1605–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, C. B., Johnson, J. K. and Heinle, D. R., 1977. Growth rules in the marine copepod genus Acartia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22: 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monakov, A. V., 1958. The life cycle of Mesocyclops leuckarti Claus (Copepoda, Cyclopoidea) (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 120: 419–421.Google Scholar
  41. Monakov, A. V., 1972. Review of studies on feeding of aquatic invertebrates conducted at the Institute of Biology of Inland Waters, Academy of Sciences, USSR. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 29: 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Munro, I. G., 1974. The effect of temperature on the development of egg, naupliar and copepodite stages of two species of copepods, Cyclops vicinus Uljanin and Eudiaptomus gracilis Sars. Oecologia 16: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nie, H. W. de, Bromley, H. J. and Vijverberg, J., 1980. Distribution patterns of zooplankton in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. J. Plankton Res. 2: 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nilssen, J. P., 1977. Cryptic predation and the demographic strategy of two limnetic cyclopoid copepods. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 34: 187–196.Google Scholar
  45. Seitz, A., 1979. On the calculation of birth-rates and death-rates in fluctuating populations with continuous recruitment. Oecologia 41: 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smyly, W. J. P., 1961. The life-cycle of the freshwater copepod Cyclops leuckarti Claus in Esthwaite Water. J. Anim. Ecol. 30: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Threlkeld, S. T., 1979. Estimating cladoceran birth-rates: the importance of egg mortality and the egg age distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vidal, J., 1980. Physioecology of zooplankton. II. Effects of phytoplankton concentration, temperature, and body size on the development and moulting rates of Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus sp. Mar. Biol. 56: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vijverberg, J., 1977. Population structure, life histories and abundance of copepods in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. Freshwat. Biol. 7: 579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vijverberg, J., 1980. Effect of temperature in laboratory studies on development and growth of Cladocera and Copepoda from Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vijverberg, J. and Frank, Th. H., 1976. The chemical composition and energy contents of freshwater copepods and cladocerans in relation to their size. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vijverberg, J. and Richter, A. F., 1982. Population dynamics and production of Daphnia hyalina Leydig and Daphnia cucullata Sars in Tjeukemeer. Hydrobiologia 95: 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waters, T. F., 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv. Ecol. Res. 10: 91–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winberg, G. G., 1956. Rate of metabolism and food requirements of fish. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Transl. Ser., 194.Google Scholar
  55. Winberg, G. G. (Ed.) and collaborators, 1971. Symbols, units and conversion factors in studies of freshwater productivity. IBP Central Office, London. 23 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Vijverberg
    • 1
  • A. F. Richter
    • 1
  1. 1.Tjeukemeer LaboratoryLimnological InstituteOosterzeeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations