Faecal indicator bacteria at fish farms

  • Maarit Niemi
  • Irmeli Taipalinen
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology 7 book series (DIHY, volume 7)


The observed concentrations of bacteria at two large fish farms were not high, but due to the great volume of the discharge the total amount of bacteria was large. Total coliform (TC) bacteria identified belonged mainly to the genera Enterobacter, Citrobacter and Aeromonas. The majority of faecal coliform (FC) strains were Escherichia coli. E. coli was absent, or occurred at very low concentrations, in the influent water, but was present in the effluent water, in the sediment, and at one fish farm also in fish faeces. FC bacteria were not observed in the fish feed. The concentrations of faecal streptococci (FS) in the influent water were low, but strains isolated were identified as group D streptococci. The concentrations of FS were low in the feed and sediment samples but were elevated in the fish faeces and also in the effluent.


total coliforms faecal coliforms faecal streptococci fish farms rainbow trout 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackefors, H. & Rosén, C.-G., 1979. Farming aquatic animals. The emergence of a world-wide industry with profound ecological consequences. Ambio 8: 132–143.Google Scholar
  2. Aoki, T., 1975. Effects of chemotherapeutics on bacterial ecology in the ponds and the intestinal tracts of cultured fish, ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Jap. J. Microbiol. 19: 7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Geldreich, E. E. & Clarke, N. A., 1966. Bacterial pollution indicators in the intestinal tract of freshwater fish. Appl. Microbiol. 14: 429–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haavisto, P., 1974. The magnitude of loading from natural fish ponds and from fish farms. Rep. Nat. Bd Wat. Finl. 74: 1–67 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  5. Haverinen, L., 1979. The loading from fish farms. Rep. Nat. Bd Wat., Finl. 170: 1–76 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  6. Lavoie, M. & Mathieu, L. G., 1974. Incidence of hemolytic and R factors in lactose-fermenting enteric bacteria isolated from the digestive tract offish. Rev. Can. Biol. 33: 185–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Moisala, E., 1979. The state of the art of fish farming and its pursuits. Ympäristö ja terveys 10: 257–259 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  8. Ruane, R. J., Chu, T.-Y. J. & Vandergriff, V. E., 1977. Characterization and treatment of waste discharged from high-density catfish cultures. Water Res. 11: 789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Souter, B. W., Sonstegard, R. A. & McDermott, L. A., 1976. Enteric bacteria in carp (Cyprinus carpio) and white suckers (Catostomus commersoni). J. Fish.Res. Bd Can. 33: 1401–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trust, T. J. & Sparrow, R. A. H., 1974. The bacterial flora in the alimentary tract of freshwater salmonid fishes. Can. J. Microbiol. 20: 1219–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Watanabe, T., Aoki, T., Ogata, Y. & Egusa, S., 1971. R factors related to fish culturing. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 182: 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarit Niemi
    • 1
  • Irmeli Taipalinen
    • 2
  1. 1.National Board of WatersHelsinki 10Finland
  2. 2.Kuopio Water District OfficeKuopio 10Finland

Personalised recommendations