Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 32))

Abstract

In the classical literature strabismic patients were held to be monocular. The deviated eye was not thought to participate in binocular vision and was thought to be excluded because of scotomatous areas whose purpose was to avoid diplopia and confusion. Anomalous retinal correspondence was thought to be an attempt to reconstruct a type of binocular vision in spite of the deviated eye. This attempt was, however, held to be always abortive and it was never thought that true binocularity could be reached (see for example the classic work of Burian 1945).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelstein, F. & C. Cüppers. Probleme der operativen Schielbehandlung. Ber. Dtsch. Ophthal. Ges. 69: 580(1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. Diagnostic et possibilité de traitement de l’état sensoriel du strabisme concomitant avec des instruments peu dissociants (test du verre strié et barre de filtres). Ann. Ocul. 194: 236(1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. Anomalous correspondence: Definition and diagnostic methods. Doc. Ophthalmol. 23: 346(1967).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. Part I — Sensorial anomalies in strabismus (Suppression, anomalas correspondence, amblyopia). Doc. Ophthalmol. 41: 1 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. Part II — Sensorio-rnotorial anomalies in strabismus. (Anomalous movements). Doc. Ophthalmol. 41: 23 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. & E.C. Campos. Binocular campimetry in small-angle concomitant esotropia. Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Series. Vol. II. Dr W. Junk, The Hague. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. & N.M. Capobianco. Subjective space in comitant squint. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 59: 430 (1965).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagolini, B. & R. Tittarelli. Considerazioni sul meccanismo antidiplopico nello strabismo concomitante. Boll. d’Ocul. 39: 211 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berard, P.V. Les prismes en thérapeutique ophthalmologique. Bull. Soc. Ophthalm. de France. 63: 626 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielschowsky, A. Congenital and acquired defects of fusion. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 18: 925 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, H.M. Sensorial retinal relationship in concomitant strabismus. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 81: 373 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, H.M. Discussion to the paper by B. Bagolini: Anomalous Correspondence: Definition and diagnostic methods. Doc. Ophthalmol. 23: 392 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, E.C. Anomalous retinal correspondence. Monocular and binocular visual evoked responses. Arch. Ophthalmol. 98: 299 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campos E.C. & T. Catellani. Perimetria binoculare nell’esotropia concomitante a piccolo angolo. Boll. Ocul. 55: 205 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, E.C. & C. Chiesi. Perimetrie binoculaire dans l’exotropia concomitant. Bull. et Mem. Soc. Franc. Opht. 92° anné, Masson, Paris 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, E.C. & M.R. Zanasi. Die anomale Fusionsbewegungen: Der senso-motorische Aspekt der anomalen Binokularsehens. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch. Klin. exp. Ophthal. 205: 101 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, R.A. Anomalous and normal motor fusion in esophoria and microesotropia. Trans. Ophthal. Soc. U.K. 100: 464 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, U. Fusion phenomena in anomalous correspondence. Acta Ophthalmol. Klin. Suppl. 37: 1 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, A. von. Über Doppelsehen nach Schiel Operationen und Incongruenz der Netzhaüte Arch. Für Ophthalmologie 1: 117 (1854).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraini, G. & L. Pasino. Variations in the fusional movements in cases of small angle convergent strabismus with harmonious anomalous retinal correspondence. Brit. J. Ophthalmol. 48: 439 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pigassou, R. & J. Garipuy, Traitement du strabisme dans l’espace libre. Arch. Ophthalmol. 26: 445 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt-Johnson, J.A. Sensory basis for prismotherapy in esotropia. Proc. 2nd Congress I. S.A. Edited by P. Fells, Diffusion générale du librairie, Marseille 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoeve, J. Über Augenmuskelwirkung und Schielen. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk. 69: 620(1922).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

A. Th. M. van Balen W. A. Houtman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bagolini, B. (1982). Anomalous Fusion. In: van Balen, A.T.M., Houtman, W.A. (eds) Strabismus Symposium Amsterdam, September 3–4, 1981. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7997-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7997-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7999-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7997-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics