Abstract
In some applications of the paradigm concept, the difference between implicit knowledge and expectations on the one hand and explicit and established knowledge on the other, is accounted for in terms of a trade off relation maintained over the paradigm life cycle. In its initial phase the paradigm is a promising source of ideas evoking possible investigations and generating expectations about their outcome. As the suggested research is gradually realized and solid data are assembled, the knowledge involved gradually becomes more articulated and the share of programmatic principles diminishes. Finally, the suggestive power of the paradigm seems used up and the scientific community is left with a more or less stabilized body of knowledge which can either be added to the store of certified knowledge or classified as a dead end. Viewed on the level of specialties, in Yellin’s (1972) terminology, the specialty enters the ‘post developed state’.
Steady advance implies exact determination of every previous step. — Sarton, G., 1962, p. 66.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Mey, M. (1982). The Life Cycle of Scientific Specialties. In: The Cognitive Paradigm. Sociology of the Sciences Monographs, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7956-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7956-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1600-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7956-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive