Forging Astroloy Supersolidus-Sintered Preforms: Necklace Structure Achievement

  • M. Jeandin
  • J. L. Koutny
  • Y. Bienvenu
Conference paper


Primary turbine disk requirements are high creep-rupture properties at rim operating conditions and a good low-cyle fatigue behaviour at hub operating ones. The maximum operating temperature does not exceed 760°C (at blade attachments), the bulk of the material being at about 650°C.

Duplex structures such as the “necklace” one exhibit a good compromise between these two major mechanical aspects; good creeprupture properties are due to large warm-worked grains, and a high resistance to crack initiation and propagation results from small recrystallized grains of the duplex structure.

This kind of structure can be obtained by forging supersolidussintered preforms, just as with conventionally HIP’ed or cast preforms. Forging temperatures and reductions were investigated and ultimately chosen such that a “necklace” structure was formed. Two batches of Astroloy powders were used (differing mainly by their carbon content, 420 p.p.m. against 260 p.p.m., and their particle zize distribution). The recovery and recrystallization mechanisms are described and illustrated in relation with deformation conditions and heat treatments. Structures and related mechanical behaviour have been characterized. The “necklace” material compares well with conventional direct HIP’ed for forged materials.

Therefore, the combinaison of liquid phase sintering and forging leading to a “necklace” structure is well-adapted to the realization of high-performance materials.


Stress Intensity Factor Fatigue Crack Growth Duplex Structure Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour Test Fatigue Crack Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    M. Jeandin, J.L. Koutny and Y. Bienvenu: 1982, to be published in Powder Met.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    A. Porter and B. Ralph: 1981, J. Mat. Sci, 16 pp 707–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    J.V. Bee, A.R. Jones and P.R. Howell: 1980 J. Mat.Sci, 15, pp. 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    M. Dahlen and L. Winberg: 1980, Acta Met., 28, pp. 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    L. Winberg and M.Dahlen: 1978, J.Mat.Sci, 13, pp 2365–2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    M. Jeandin: 1982, to be published in J.Mat.Sci.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    C.H. Symonds, J.W. Eggar, G.J. Lewis and A.J. Siddal: 1980, Proc. of the P/M superalloy Conference, Zurich, Metal Powder Report, 1, pp. 17.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    P. Lescop, M. Marty and A.Walder: 1976, Proc. of the 42 nd meeting of the AGARD structures and Materials Panel, AGARD, 200, pp. 8.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    C. Aubin: 1981, These de Docteur-Ingenieur. Ecole des Mines de Paris.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    M. Clavel, C. Levaillant and A. Pineau: 1980, Proc. of the AIME Fall Meeting, the Metal Soc. of AIME, pp.24.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    J. Gayda and R.V. Miner: NASA Technical Memorandum 81740.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Jeandin
    • 1
  • J. L. Koutny
    • 1
  • Y. Bienvenu
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre des MatériauxEcole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de ParisEvry CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations