Skip to main content

A New Algorithm of Solving the Flow — Shop Problem

  • Chapter
Book cover Operations Research in Progress

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 32))

Abstract

The general flow — shop problem indicated by n|m|F|Cmax, can be formulated as follows. Each of n jobs J,…,Jn has to be processed on m machines M1,…,Mm in that order. Job Jj, j=1,…,n, thus consists of a sequence of m operations oj1..,,…,0. jm0jk corresponds to the processing of Jj on Mk during a processing time Pjk We want to find a processing order on each machine Mk such that the time required to complete all jobs is minimized. If the processing order is assumed to be the same on each machine, the resulting problem is called the permutation flow — shop problem, and indicated by n|m|F|Cmax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.P.G. Brown and Z.A. Lomnicki, “Some Applications of the Branch-and-Bound Algorithm to the Machine Scheduling Problem”, Opl. Res. Quart. 17, 173–186 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Grabowski, “On two-machine scheduling with release and due dates to minimize maximum lateness”, Opsearch 17, No. 4, 133–154 C 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Johnson, “Optimal Two-and-Three-Stage Production Scheduls with Setup Times Included”, Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 61–68 CI 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Jackson, “Scheduling a Production Line to Minimize Maximum Tardines”, Research Report 43, Management Science Research Project, University of California, Los Angeles, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.J. Lageweg, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, “Minimizing Maximum Lateness on One Machine: Computational Experience and Some Applications”, Statistics Neerlandica 30, 24–41 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.J. Lageweg, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, “A General Bounding Scheme for the Permutation Plow-Shop Problem”, Opns. Res. 26, 53–67 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, and P. Brucker, “Complexity of Machine Scheduling Problems”, Ann. Discrete Math. 1, 343–362 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, “Machine Scheduling Problems: Classification, Complexity and Computations”, Nijhoff, The Hague (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Szwarc, “Johnson’s Approximate Method for the 3xn Job Shop Problem”, Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 24, 153–157 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grabowski, J. (1982). A New Algorithm of Solving the Flow — Shop Problem. In: Feichtinger, G., Kall, P. (eds) Operations Research in Progress. Theory and Decision Library, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7901-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7901-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7903-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7901-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics