Abstract
An expanding public awareness of the value of voice command of machines has made it critical that the previous trial-and-error methods for buying, using, and designing speech recognizers be replaced by systematic procedures. A methodology has been developed with Honeywell for identifying frequently-occurring discrete tasks in high-workload situations for which manual machine control is difficult and the utility of voice input is high. The feasibilities of voice in such tasks have also been assessed, based on the confusabilities of the vocabularies, the noise conditions, and other factors. The detailed specifications of current devices that permit recognition of isolated words and restricted word sequences have been compiled, and criteria defined for selecting the best device for each purpose. Recently, initial side-by-side comparisons of recognizers have been made, and tests have been designed for systematic testing of devices under a variety of representative conditions. The design of better recognizers should begin with consideration of features that assure competitiveness, special facilities that aid the user, and algorithms that are not critically dependent upon word boundaries, equal attention on all acoustic data, or simplistic template matching. It is now possible to advance the state of the “art” of speech recognition to more of a systematic “science” for effective buying, trying, applying, and modifying of speech recognizers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chapanis, A. (1975), “Interactive Human Communication”, Scientific American, 232, No. 3, 36–42.
Doddington, G. R., and T. B. Schalk (1981), “Speech Recognition: Turning Theory to Practice”, IEEE Spectrum, 18, Sept., 1981, 26.
Honeywell (1980), “Application of Advanced Speech Technology in Manned Penetration Bombers”, Proposal from Honeywell Systems and Research Center to Wright-Patterson AFB. Minneapolis.
Lea, W. A. (1980). Trends in Speech Recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Especially Chs. 1 and 8.
Lea, W. A. (1980b), “Issues in the Selection and Practical Use of Speech Recognizers”, Proceedings of the Symposium on Voice Interactive Systems: Applications and Payoffs, Dallas, TX, pp. 357-372.
Lea, W. A. (1981), Computer Recognition of Speech (book). Santa Barbara, CA: Speech Science Publications.
Lea, W. A. (1981), “Assessing the Feasibilities of Airborne Speech Recognition Tasks”, prepared by Speech Science Publications, Santa Barbara, CA, for Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN, May 19, 1981.
Lea, W. A. (1982). Selecting, Designing, and Using Speech Recognizers (book). Santa Barbara, CA: Speech Science Publications
Lea, W. A. (1981), “Speech Recognition, in Electronic Technology … the Next 25 Years”, Silver Anniversary Issue, EDN, October 14, 1981, pp. 168-172.
Lea, W. A. (1981), “A Research Program to Advance Airborne Uses of Voice I/0”, prepared by Speech Science Publications for Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Martin, T. B. and J. R. Welch (1980), “Practical Speech Recognizers and Some Performance Effectiveness Parameters”, in Trends in Speech Recognition (W. A. Lea, Ed.). Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall, 24–38.
North, R. A. (1981), “Application of Advanced Speech Technology in Manned Penetration Bombers”, Final Report from Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN, on Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (WPAFB) contract number F33515-80-C-3606, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
Pallett, D. (1982), Editor, “Proceedings of the Workshop on Standardization of Speech I/O Technology”, sponsored by the National Bureau of Standards and Naval Air Development Center, March, 1982.
Reddy, D. R. (1976), Speech Understanding Systems: Summary of Results of the Five Year Research Effort at Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Also, cf. B. Lowerre and D. R. Reddy (1980), “The Harpy Speech Understanding System”, in Trends in Speech Recognition (W. A. Lea, Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 340-360.
Baker, J. M. (1981), “Issues and Answers in Evaluation of Automatic Speech Recognizers”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Supplement 1, Vol. 70, Fall, 1981.
Lea, W. A. (1982), “What Causes Speech Recognizers to Make Mistakes?”, Proceedings of the 1982 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Paris, France, 2030-2033.
Lea, W. A. (1982), “Design of Efficient Standard Tests for Evaluating Speech Recognizers,” Final Report on NADC Contract to Speech Communications Research Laboratory, Los Angeles, CA.
Lea, W. A., and F. Clermont (TO APPEAR), “Algorithms for Acoustic Prosodic Analysis.”
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lea, W.A. (1982). Selecting, Designing, and Using Practical Speech Recognizers. In: Haton, JP. (eds) Automatic Speech Analysis and Recognition. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 88. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7879-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7879-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7881-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7879-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive