Skip to main content

The Role of Order in Lattice Theory

  • Conference paper
Ordered Sets

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((ASIC,volume 83))

Abstract

As an algebraic system, a lattice is a two operation system with equation definable axioms. The usual axiom set is the following:

  • Idempotent laws: aa = a, aa = a

  • Commutative laws: ab = ba, ab = ba

  • Associative laws: (ab) ∨ c = a ∨ (bc), (ab) ∧ c = a ∧ (bc)

  • Adsorptive laws: a ∨ (ab) = a, a ∧ (ab) = a.

A particularly significant feature of a lattice as an algebraic system is the fact that it has an intrinsic order relation given by \(a \leqslant b{\text{ if and only if }}a \wedge b = a\) or equivalently \(a \leqslant b{\text{ if and only if }}a \wedge b = b\)

The lattice axioms insure that this relation is a partial order consistent with the lattice operations.

The intrinsic character of the lattice ordering sets lattices apart from most other ordered algebraic systems, such as ordered groups, ordered rings, ordered fields, etc. in which the order relation is imposed on the system and has specified properties. Furthermore, the lattice operations themselves can be defined in terms of the lattice order relation.

$$\begin{gathered} {\text{Least upper bound: }}a \vee b \geqslant a,b; \hfill \\ x \geqslant a,b \Rightarrow x \geqslant a \vee b \hfill \\ {\text{Greatest lower bound: }}a,b \geqslant a \wedge b; \hfill \\ a,b \geqslant x \Rightarrow a \wedge b \geqslant x. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

This special relationship between order properties and algebraic properties for lattices has played an important role in the development of lattice theory. Some of the more significant implications of this relationship will be examined in this paper.

1. A finite partially ordered set is completely determined by the set of covering pairs, namely, those pairs (a,b) for which a > b and there is no x for which a > x > b. It follows that a finite lattice is determined by its set of covering pairs. This leads immediately to the lattice diagram of a finite lattice in which the elements of the lattice are represented by points on a sheet of paper so arranged that for a covering pair (a,b) the point corresponding to a lies above the point corresponding to b and is joined to it by a line segment. Infinite lattices with a sufficiently regular structure can also be diagramed in this manner. From the earliest investigations, lattice diagrams have been an inportant research tool and a useful device for exposition. [5, 21, 25, 31]

2. Associated with any partially ordered set is a lattice (in fact, a complete lattice) obtained as a generalization of Dedekind’s completion by cuts. If A is a subset of the partially ordered set and A* is the set of upper bounds of A and A* is the set of lower bounds of A, then A →(A*)* is a closure operation on the subsets and the closed subsets under set inclusion are a complete lattice — the normal completion of the partially ordered set. This construction is basic for the study of many embedding problems. When applied to lattices, the completion process preserves the meet and join operations and hence is a lattice embedding. Thus it is not unexpected that the normal completion is useful in the study of purely algebraic problems in lattice theory. [8, 20]

3. Associated with any finite distributive lattice L is the partially ordered set J of its join irreducible elements (q is join irreducible if q = ab implies q = a or q = b). The order ideals of J form a lattice isomorphic to L. Under this correspondence, many algebraic properties of L are reflected in order- theoretic properties of J. Since the order-theoretic analogues of algebraic problems may be easier to attack, this correspondence frequently provides a promising approach to the study of problems concerning distributive lattices. [2, 11]

4. Much of the structure theory of algebraic systems centers on the study of the lattice of congruence relations. In particular, the lattice of congruence relations on a lattice plays a very important role in exhibiting its lattice structure. As a consequence of being an ordered system the lattice of congruence relations on a lattice is distributive. In turn, the congruence distributivity of lattices underlies many of the most interesting structure theorems for lattices. [12, 14, 17]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Ajtai (1973) On a class of finite lattices, Periodica Math. Hungar. 4(2–3), 217–230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Birkhoff (1933) On the combination of subalgebras, Proc. Comb. Phil. Soc. 29, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Birkhoff and M. Ward (1939) A characterization of Boolean algebras, Annals of Math. 40, 609–610.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bruns (1961) Distributivität und subdirekte Zerlegbarkeit Vollständiger Verbände, Arch. Math. 12, 61–66.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Crawley (1961) Decomposition theory of nonsemimodular lattices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 99, 246–254.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Crawley (1960) Lattices whose congruences form a Boolean algebra, Pacific J. Math. 10, 787–795.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Davey and I. Rival (1976) Finite sublattices of three generated lattices, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 21 (Series A), 171–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R.A. Dean (1956) Component subsets of the free lattice on n generators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7, 220–226.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Dedekind (1900) Über die von drei Moduln erzeugte Dualgruppe, Math. Annalen 53, 371–404.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. R.P. Dilworth (1945) Lattices with unique complements, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 57, 123–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R.P. Dilworth (1950) A decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets, Annals of Math. 51, 161–166.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R.P. Dilworth (1950) The structure of relatively complemented lattices, Annals of Math. 51, 348–359.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Duffus and I. Rival (19 76) Crowns in dismantlable partially ordered sets, Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 18, 271–292.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Funayama and T. Nakayama (1942) On the distributivity of the lattice of congruences, Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 18, 553–554.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Grädtzer and E.T. Schmidt (1962) On congruence lattices of lattices, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 14, 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Hashimoto (1957) Direct, subdirect decompositions and congruence relations, Osaka Math. J. 9, 87–112.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Jónsson (1967) Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive, Math. Scand. 21, 110–112.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Kelly and I. Rival (19 74) Crowns, fences and dismantlable lattices, Canad. J. Math 26, 1257–1271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Kelly and I. Rival (1975) Planar lattices, Canad. J. Math., 636–665.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. MacNeille (1937) Partially ordered sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 42, 416–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. J.E. McLaughlin (1956) Atomic lattices with unique comparable complements, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7, 864–866.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. G.N. Raney (1953) A subdirect-union representation for completely distributive complete lattices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4, 518–522.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Rival (1974) Lattices with doubly irreducible elements, Canad. Math. Bull. 17, 91–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Rival and B. Sands, Pictures in lattice theory, to appear in Annals of Discrete Math.

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Rival and R. Wille (19 79) Lattices generated by partially ordered sets: which can be “drawn”? J. Reine Angew Math. 310, 56–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Rolf (1958) The free lattice generated by a set of chains, Pacific J. Math. 8, 585–595.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. E.T. Schmidt (1962) Über der Kongruenzverbände der Verbände, Publ. Math. Debrecen 9, 243–256.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Tarski (1946) A remark on functionally free algebras, Annals of Math. 47, 163–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Wille (1977) On lattices freely generated by finite partially ordered sets, Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 17, 581–593.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Wille (19 72) Primitive subsets of lattices, Alg.Universalis 2, 95–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Wille (1976) Aspects of finite lattices, Proc. of the Conference on higher combinatorics, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dilworth, R.P. (1982). The Role of Order in Lattice Theory. In: Rival, I. (eds) Ordered Sets. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7800-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7798-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics