Skip to main content

To Benefit and Respect Persons: A Challenge for Beneficence in Health Care

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 11))

Abstract

The belief that health care should be a beneficent enterprise is explicit in the “Principles of Medical Ethics” adopted by the American Medical Association in 1957. The first section states that “the principal objective of the medical profession is to render service to humanity with full respect of the dignity of man” ([1], p. 39). It is not unreasonable to suggest that this objective would be acceptable to almost all health care personnel and institutions. The ideal and norm of ‘service tempered by respect’ is one worthy of moral admiration. If service is accurately interpreted to mean benefit, then a grounding of this objective in the principle of beneficence seems warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American Medical Association: 1957, ‘Principles of Medical Ethics (1957)’, in S. J. Reiser, et. al. (eds.), Ethics in Medicine, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1977), pp. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F.: 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, L. A.: 1980, Friendship, Altruism, and Morality, Routlege and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt, R. B.: 1979,. A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donagan, A.: 1977, The Theory of Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyck, A.: 1975, ‘Beneficent Euthanasia and Benemortasia: Alternative Views of Mercy’, in M. Kohl (ed.), Beneficent Euthanasia, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: (not dated), ‘Autonomy and Biomedicine’, Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feinberg, J.: 1970, ‘Action and Responsibility’, in Doing and Deserving, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 119–151.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg, J.: 1971, ‘Legal Paternalism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (September), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foot, P.: 1978, Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankena, W. F.: 1973, Ethics, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gadow, S.: 1980, ‘Medicine, Ethics, and the Elderly’, The Gerontologist 20, 680–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaylin, W.: 1978, ‘In the Beginning: Helpless and Dependent’ in W. Gaylin, et al., Doing Good: The limits of Benevolence, pantheon Books. New York, pp. 12–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonas, H.: 1969, ‘Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects’, in S. J. Reiser, et al. (eds.), Ethics in Medicine, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. ( 1977 ), pp. 304–315.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kant, I.: 1964, The Doctrine of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysic of Morals, Mary J. Gregor, trans., University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohl, M.: 1975, ‘Voluntary Beneficent Euthanasia’, in M. Kohl (ed.)., Beneficent Euthanasia, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maclntyre, A.: 1977, ‘Utilitarianism and Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Essay on the Relevance of Moral Philosophy to Bureaucratic Theory’, in K. Sayre (ed.), Values in the Electric Power Industry, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mackie, J. L.: 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mill, J. S.: 1956, On Liberty, C. V. Shields (ed.), Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mill, J. S.: 1971, Utilitarianism, S. Gorovitz (ed.), Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murdoch, I.: 1966, ‘Vision and Choice in Morality’, in I. T. Ramsey (ed.), Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, SCM Press, London, pp. 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Outka, G.: 1912, Agape: An Ethical Analysis, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C.: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rothman, D. J.: 1978, ‘The State as Parent: Social Policy in the Progressive Era,’ in W. Gaylin, et al., Doing Good: The Limits of Benevolence, Pantheon Books, New York, pp. 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strawson, P. F.: 1966, ‘Social Morality and Individual Ideal’, in I. T. Ramsey (ed.), Christian Ethics and Contemporary Philosophy, SCM Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warnock, G. J.: 1971, The Object of Morality, Methuen and Co., Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelp, E.E. (1982). To Benefit and Respect Persons: A Challenge for Beneficence in Health Care. In: Shelp, E.E. (eds) Beneficence and Health Care. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7769-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7769-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7771-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7769-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics