Competition, Decision, and Consensus

  • Stephen Grossberg
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 70)

Abstract

This chapter proves that all competitive systems which admit an adaptation level are absolutely stable. This theorem suggests an approach to an old philosophical problem: How can you design systems of communicators wherein each communicator is characterized by arbitrary individual differences, or personal parameters, each communicator knows about other communicators only through locally perceived signals, yet the communication system as a whole can generate a global consensus? How can the system as a whole achieve coherence even if its parts are carelessly thrown together? One answer is: “Balance the individual differences against an adaptation level”. In other words, if you design part of the system very carefully, you can let the rest go wild without sacrificing system stability. It seems to me that this type of insight should be generally better understood, notably in discussions of free market forces.

Keywords

Coherence Rosen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Grossberg, Communication, memory, and development, in “Progress in Theoretical Biology” (R. Rosen and F. Snell, Eds.), Vol. 5. Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Grossberg, On the development of feature detectors in the visual cortex with applications to learning and reaction-diffusion systems, Biol. Cybernetics 21 (1976), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Grossberg, Contour enhancement, short term memory, and constancies in reverberating neural networks, Studies in Appl. Math. 52 (1973), 213–257.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Grossberg and D. S. Levine, Some developmental and attentional biases in the contrast enhancement and short term memory of recurrent neural network, J. Theoret. Biol. 53 (1975), 341–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Ellias and S. Grossberg, Pattern formation, contrast control, and oscillations in the short term memory of shunting on-center off-surround networks, Biol. Cybernetics 20 (1975), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. S. Levine and S. Grossberg, Visual illusions in neural networks: Line neutralization, tilt aftereffect, and angle expansion, J. Theoret. Biol. 61 (1976), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Grossberg, Preference order competition implies global limits in n-dimensional competition systems (1977), submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. N. Lorenz, The problem of deducing the climate from the governing equations, Tellus 16 (1964), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.-Y. Li and J. A. Yorke, Period three implies choas, Amer. Math. Monthly 82 (1975), 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. M. May and W. J. Leonard, Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29 (1975), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Grossberg, Decisions, patterns, and oscillations in nonlinear competitive systems, with applications to Volterra-Lotka systems, J. Theoret. Biol. 73 (1978), 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Grossberg, Pattern formation by the global limits of a nonlinear competitive interaction in N dimensions, J. Math. Biol. 4 (1977), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Grossberg, On the global limits and oscillations of a system of nonlinear differential equations describing a flow on a probabilistic network, J. Differential Equations 5 (1969), 531–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Grossberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsBoston UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations