Some Logical Problems Suggested by Empirical Theories

  • Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 31)


Can empirical theories influence or even transform logic? In other words: is logic in some sense “empirical”? This is an old philosophical question which has given rise to many controversies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Birkhoff, G. and J. von Neumann, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936), 823–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dalla Chiara, M. L. and G. Toraldo di Francia, ‘A Logical Analysis of Physical Theories’, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, Serie 2, Vol. 3 (1973), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dishkant, H., ‘Semantics of the Minimal Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Studia Logica 30 (1972), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Finch, P. D., ‘Quantum Logic as an Implication Algebra’, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 2 (1970), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fine, A., ‘Some Conceptual Problems of Quantum Theory’, in Paradigms and Paradoxes, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Finkelstein, D., ‘Matter, Space and Logic’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 5, D. Reidel Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Friedman, M., and C. Glymour, ‘If Quanta Had Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fuchs, W. R., ‘Ansätze zu einer Quantcnlogik’, Theoria 30 (1964), 437–440.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hughes, G. H. and M. J. Cresswell, An Introduction to Modal Logic, London: Methuen, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jauch, J. M., ‘Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, in Proceedings of the International SchoolEnrico Fermi”, Course IL, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Mackey, G., The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Przetęcki, M., The Logic of Empirical Theories, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Putnam, H., ‘Is Logic Empirical?’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 5, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 216–241.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Sneed, J. D., The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel Dordrecht, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Suppes, P., ‘A Comparison of Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences’, Synthese 12 (1960), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Suppes, P., Introduction to Logic, Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1952.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    van Fraassen, B. C., ‘The Labyrinth of Quantum Logics’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 13: Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics, Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1969/1972. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel, 1974, pp. 224–254.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    van Fraassen, B. C., ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’ in Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyUniversity of FlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations