Abstract: The Principles Considered
The paper is meant to explain and, where possible, briefly to substantiate the following central principles:
-
1.
The study of morphology has been based on the concept of homology or the assignment of different structures to one category. Categories based on intuitive groupings have been successful to a degree that merits explanation.
-
2.
A possible definition of homology that would include both ontogenetic and evolutionary considerations relates not to mature structure but to shared developmental processes.
-
3.
In the development of plant organs, processes occurring early in primordia generally show a wider homology than any others. (Therefore, categories such as “leaf” may be defined as groups whose members share some very early primordial states.)
-
4.
Since different processes cannot be expected to evolve at the same average rate, the conservative ones should be used as a basis for morphology. Developmental programs operating early in ontogeny are usually conservative from an evolutionary point of view because when they change there are many important consequences often leading to a disruption of the functional integrity of the mature structures. In plants this conservatism is apparent in meristematic stages of organ development and not in embryos or seedlings.
-
5.
The evolution of controls for the location, duration and timing of developmental processes could be expected to restrict plants to a limited number of morphological organ categories and to various intermediate organs: the observed facts can therefore be accounted for.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arber, A. 1950. The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bostrack, J. M. and W. F. Millington. 1962. On the determination of leaf form in an aquatic heterophyllous species of Ranunculus. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 89: 1–20.
Carlquist, S. 1969. Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretation of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19: 332–362.
Corner, E. J. H. 1958. Transference of function. J. Linn. Soc. London 56: 33–40.
Cusick, F. 1966. On phylogenetic and ontogenetic fusions. In: Cutter, E. G. (ed) Trends in Plant Morphogenesis. London: Longmans. Cutter, E. G. 1971. Plant Anatomy, Vol. 2, London: Edward Arnold. Dobzhansky, Th. 1955. Evolution, Genetics and Man. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Eckardt, T. 1964. Das Homologieproblem und FSlle strittiger Homologien. Phytomorphology 14: 79–92.
Foster, A. S. 1935. A histogenetic study of foliar determination of Carya buchlayi. Amer. J. Bot. 22: 88–147.
Foster, A. S. 1941. Comparative studies on the structure of the shoot apex in seed plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 68: 339–350.
Frank, D. H. 1976. Comparative morphology and early leaf histogenesis of adult and juvenile leaves of Darlingtonia californica and their bearing on the concept of heterophylly. Bot. Gaz. 137: 20–34.
Goebel, K. 1900. Organography of Plants. Part 1: General Organography. Reprinted 1969. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hamshaw Thomas, H. 1957. Presidential address: plant morphology and the condition of the flowering plants. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 168: 125–133.
Jong, K. and B. L. Burtt. 1975. The evolution of morphological novelty exemplified with the growth patterns of some Gesneriaceae. New Phytol. 75: 297–311.
Kaplan, D. R. 1971. On the value of comparative development in phylogenetic studies: a rejoinder. Phytomorphology 21: 134–140.
Kaplan, D. R. 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 95: 1–105.
Lorch, J. 1958. Beitrag zur Kritik der idealistischer Morphologie. Oest. Bot. Z. 105: 83–87.
Mason, H. L. 1957. The concept of the flower and the theory of homology. Madrono 14: 81–95.
Mauseth, J. D. 1978. An investigation of the phylogenetic and ontogenetic variability of shoot apical meristems in the Cactaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 65: 326–333.
Meeuse, A. D. J. 1966. Fundamentals of Phytomorphology. New York: Ronald Press Company.
Pellegrini, 0. 1961. Modificazione delle prospettive morfogenetiche in primordi fogliari chirurgicamente isolati dal meristema apicale del germoglio. Delpinoa N.S. 3: 1–12.
Sachs, T. 1972a. Regeneration experiments on the determination of leaf form. Israel J. Bot. 18: 21–30.
Sachs, T. 1972b. A possible basis for apical organization in plants. J. Theor. Biol. 37: 353–361.
Sachs, T. 19 75. Plant tumors resulting from unregulated hormone synthesis. J. Theor. Biol. 55: 445–453.
Sachs, T. 1978a. Patterned differentiation in plants. Differentiation 11: 65–73.
Sachs, T. 1978b. Phyletic diversity in higher plants. Pi. Syst. Evol. 130: 1–11.
Sachs, T. 1981. Polarity changes and tissue organization in plants. In: Schweiger, H. G. (ed) International Cell Biology 1980–1981. Berlin: Springer Verlag, p. 489–496.
Sattler, R. 1966. Towards a more adequate approach to comparative morphology. Phytomorphology 16: 417–429.
Sattler, R. 1974a. A new conception of the shoot in higher plants. J. Theor. Biol. 47: 367–382.
Sattler, R. 1974b. A new approach to gynoecial morphology. Phytomorphology 24: 22–34.
Sattler, R. 1978a. What is theoretical plant morphology? In: Sattler, R. (ed) Theoretical Plant Morphology. Acta Biotheor. 27: 5–20 (supplement: Folia Biotheor. 7 ).
Sattler, R. 1978b. “Fusion” and “continuity” in floral morphology. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 36: 397–405.
Schuepp, O. 1939. Untersuchungen zur beschreibenden und experimentellen Entwicklungsgeschichte -von Acer psuedoplantanus L. Jb. Wiss. Bot. 70: 743–804.
Schilepp, O. 1969. Morphological concepts: their meaning in the ideal morphology and in comparative ontogeny. Amer. J. Bot. 56: 799–804.
Sinnott,E. W. 1960. Plant Morphogenesis. New York: McGraw-Hill. Snow, M. and R. Snow. 1959. The dorsiventrality of leaf primordia. New Phytol. 58: 188–207.
Stebbins, G. L. Jr. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stebbins, G. L. Jr. 1974. Flowering Plants. Evolution Above the Species Level. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Steeves, T. A. 1966. On the determination of leaf primordia in ferns. In: Cutter, E. G. (ed) Trends in Plant Morphogenesis. London: Longmans. Sussex, J. M. 1955. Experimental investigation of leaf dorsiventrality and orientation in the juvenile shoot. Phytomorphology 5: 286–300.
Takhtajan, A. 1972. Patterns of ontogenetic alterations in the evolution of higher plants. Phytomorphology 22: 164–170.
Tepfer, S. S. 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny in Aqueligia formosa var. truncata and Ranunculus repens. Univ. Calif. PublBot. 25: 513–576.
Troll, W. and H. Dietz. 1954. Morphologische und histogenetische Untersuchungen an Utviculavia-Arten. Oest. Bot. Z. 101: 165–207.
Waddington, C. W. 1966. Principles of Development and Differentiation. New York: McMillan.
Wareing, P. F. 1978. Determination in plant development. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) Sp. Issue 1: 3–17.
Wochok, Z. S. and I. M. Sussex. 1976. Redetermination of cultured root tips to leafy shoots in SelagineHa willdenowti,. PI. Sci. Lett. 6: 185–192.
Woodger, J. H. 1945. On biological transformations. In: LeGros Clark, W. E. and P. B. Medawar (eds). Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Zimmermann, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen, 2nd ed. Jena, Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.
Zimmermann, W. 1961. Phylogenetic shifting of organs, tissues and phases in pteridophytes. Can. J. Bot. 39: 1547–1553.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Martinus Nijhoff / Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sachs, T. (1982). A Morphogenetic Basis for Plant Morphology. In: Sattler, R. (eds) Axioms and Principles of Plant Construction. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7636-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7636-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7638-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7636-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive