Surface activity and bubble motion
This paper reviews recent progress in the theories of the surface boundary conditions of adsorbed solutes in liquids, and of the effects of those solutes on the steady motion of a bubble or drop in the liquid. Both singular perturbation theory and numerical solutions have useful roles in this problem, and their relationship is explored. In addition, analytical solutions are given to two problems concerning a spherical bubble rising steadily at low Reynolds number in a viscous fluid. One of these is displacement of the internal vortex centre from its position in the absence of surface activity when there is a small stagnant cap of surfactant at the rear. The results agree with experimental data in the direction of that displacement but give only about half its amount. The other problem is the velocity perturbation all round the surface caused by a very dilute solution of a weak surfactant at high Péclet number. This compares quite well with the numerical solution for a Péclet number of 60, having relative errors of order (60)−1/2 as would be expected.
KeywordsStagnation Point Velocity Perturbation Surface Boundary Condition Spherical Bubble Bubble Motion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Clift R, Grace JR and Weber ME (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- 7.Deryagin BV, Dukhin SS and Lisichenko VA (1959) The kinetics of the attachment of mineral particles to bubbles during flotation. I. The electric field of a moving bubble. Russ J Phys Chem (Engl Transl) 33: 389–393.Google Scholar
- 8.Deryagin BV, Dukhin SS and Lisichenko VA (1960) The kinetics of the attachment of mineral particles to bubbles during flotation. II. The electric field of a moving bubble when the surface activity of the inorganic substance is high. Russ J Phys Chem (Engl Transl) 34: 248–251.Google Scholar
- 9.Dukhin SS (1966) An electrical diffusion theory of the Dorn effect and a discussion of the possibility of measuring zeta potentials. Res Surface Forces, Proc 2nd Conf, Moscow 1962, (Engl Transl) 2: 54–74: New York: Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
- 10.Gradshteyn IS and Ryzhik IM (1966) Table of integrals, series and products: fourth edition. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- 15.Huang WS and Kintner RC (1969) Effect of surfactants on mass transfer inside drops AIChE J 15: 735–744.Google Scholar
- 17.Kronig R and Brink JC (1950) On the theory of extraction from falling droplets. Appl Sci Res A2: 142–154.Google Scholar
- 20.Le Van MD and Newman J (1976) Reply (to letter from DA Saville). AIChE J 23: 614.Google Scholar
- 21.Lucassen J and Giles D (1975) Dynamic surface properties of nonionic surfactant solutions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I 71: 217–232.Google Scholar
- 24.Savic P (1953) Circulation and distortion of liquid drops falling through a viscous medium. Rep MT-22, Div Mech Eng, Nat Res Coun Canada.Google Scholar
- 25.Saville DA (1973) The effects of interfacial tension gradients on the motion of bubbles or drops. Chem Eng J 5: 251–9.Google Scholar