Diagnostic Dilemma of Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma
Early squamous cervical carcinoma responds well to both primary surgical treatment in the form of radical hysterectomy, and also to adequate radiotherapy: cure rates in terms of 90 percent are expected. However, recurrent or residual disease has a much more sinister prognosis so that only 10 percent will be alive 2 years after diagnosis of the recurrence (Calame 1969). The detection and subsequent management of such recurrence can be very difficult, especially after radiotherapy. From the natural history of the disease it can be seen that the majority of recurrences will manifest themselves during the first 2 years following treatment and deaths due to the disease will in the main have occurred during the first 5 years. To give these cases a chance for survival, they must be detected as early as possible.
KeywordsLymphoma Anemia Oncol Barium Paraffin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burghardt E, Pickel H: Local spread and lymph node involvement in cervical cancer. Obstet and Gynecol 52: 138, 1978.Google Scholar
- Ferrucci JT, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, Harbin WP, Kirkpatrick RH, Taft PD: Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenology 134: 323, 1980.Google Scholar
- KottmeierHL: Evaluation of treatment of recurrences after surgery and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer of the Uterus and Ovary. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969, p 283.Google Scholar
- Lee JKT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, McClennan BL: Accuracy of C.T. in detecting intraabdominal and pelvic lymph node metastases from pelvic cancers. Am J Roentgenol 131: 675, 1978.Google Scholar
- St Bartholomew’s Hospital (Report): Abscess of the liver with hydatids: operation. Lancet 189: 1833–4Google Scholar
- Shingleton HM, Fowler WC, Koch GC: Pretreatment evaluation in cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110: 388, 1971.Google Scholar
- Symmonds RE, Pratt JH, Welch JS: Exenterative operations Am J Obstet Gynecol 101: 66, 1968.Google Scholar