Diagnostic Dilemma of Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma

  • J. H. Shepherd
  • H. Praphat
  • E. Ruffolo
  • D. Cavanagh
Part of the Developments in Obstetrics and Gynecology book series (DIOG, volume 6)


Early squamous cervical carcinoma responds well to both primary surgical treatment in the form of radical hysterectomy, and also to adequate radiotherapy: cure rates in terms of 90 percent are expected. However, recurrent or residual disease has a much more sinister prognosis so that only 10 percent will be alive 2 years after diagnosis of the recurrence (Calame 1969). The detection and subsequent management of such recurrence can be very difficult, especially after radiotherapy. From the natural history of the disease it can be seen that the majority of recurrences will manifest themselves during the first 2 years following treatment and deaths due to the disease will in the main have occurred during the first 5 years. To give these cases a chance for survival, they must be detected as early as possible.


Needle Biopsy Obstet Gynecol Cervical Carcinoma Radical Hysterectomy Intravenous Pyelography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams HL, McNeil BJ: Medical implications of computed tomography (CAT scanning). N Engl J Med 298: 310, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adcock LL: Radical hysterectomy preceding pelvic irradiation. Gyn Oncol 8: 152, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberts DS, Woolfenden JM, Haber K, Giles HR, Galendo J: Comparison of ultrasonic and indium-III-bleomycin scanning of gynecologic tumors. Gyn Oncol 6: 145, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman ML, Lagassee LD, Watring WG, Ballon SC, Schlesinger RE, Moore JG, Donaldson RC: The operative evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma by an extraperitoneal approach. Obstet Gynecol 50: 658, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown RC, Buchsbaum HJ, Tewfik HH, Platz CS: Accuracy of lymphangiography in the diagnosis of para-aortic lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 54: 571, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunschwig A: What are the indications and results of pelvic exenteration? J Am Med Assoc 194: 204, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burghardt E, Pickel H: Local spread and lymph node involvement in cervical cancer. Obstet and Gynecol 52: 138, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Calame RJ: Recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 105: 380, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter BL, Kahn PC, Wolpert SM, Hammerschlag SB, Schwartz AM, Scott RM: Unusual pelvic masses: A comparison of computed tomographic scanning and ultrasonography. Radiology 121: 383, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Donald I: Ultrasonic echo sounding in obstetrical and gynecological diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 93: 935, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrucci JT, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, Harbin WP, Kirkpatrick RH, Taft PD: Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Roentgenology 134: 323, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. Henriksen E: The lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the cervix and body of the uterus: a study of 420 necropsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 58: 924, 1949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. KottmeierHL: Evaluation of treatment of recurrences after surgery and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer of the Uterus and Ovary. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 1969, p 283.Google Scholar
  14. Lee JKT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, McClennan BL: Accuracy of C.T. in detecting intraabdominal and pelvic lymph node metastases from pelvic cancers. Am J Roentgenol 131: 675, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. Melzack R, Ofiesh JA, Bount BM: The Brompton mixture: effects on pain in cancer patients. Can Med Assoc J 115: 125, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nash CH, Alberts DS, Suciu TN, Giles HR, Tobias DA, Waldman RS: Comparison of B-mode ultrasonography and computed tomography in gynecologic cancer. Gyn Oncol 8: 172, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paunier JP, Delclos L, Fletcher GH: Causes time of death and sites of failure in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix on intact uterus. Radiology 88: 555, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Photopulos GJ, Shirley REL, Ansbacher R: Evaluation of conventional diagnostic tests for detection of recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129: 533, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Piver MS, Barlow JJ: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy, aortic node biopsy and aortic lymphangiography in staging patients with advanced cervical cancer. Cancer 32: 367, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Platt LD, Manning FA, Hill LM: Simultaneous real-time ultrasound scanning and pelvic examination in assessment of pelvic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 693, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. St Bartholomew’s Hospital (Report): Abscess of the liver with hydatids: operation. Lancet 189: 1833–4Google Scholar
  22. Sevin B, Greening SE, Nadji M, Ng AB, Averette HE, Nordqvist SRB: Fine needle aspiration cytology in gynecologic oncology, cervical aspects. Acta Cytologica 23: 277, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shepherd JH, Cavanagh D, Praphat H, Ruffolo E: The value of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. Gynec Oncol 11: 309, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shingleton HM, Fowler WC, Koch GC: Pretreatment evaluation in cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110: 388, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Symmonds RE, Pratt JH, Welch JS: Exenterative operations Am J Obstet Gynecol 101: 66, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. Symmonds RE, Pratt JH, Webb MJ: Exenterative operations: experience with 198 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121: 907, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Voorhis LW: Carcinoma of the cervix. II A critical evaluation of patient follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 108: 115, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Shepherd
  • H. Praphat
  • E. Ruffolo
  • D. Cavanagh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations