Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Samuelsonian Theory and the Process of Change

  • Chapter
Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought ((RETH,volume 1))

  • 171 Accesses

Abstract

When Friedman reviewed the Jaffé translation of Walras’s great work, he concluded with a significant statement:

This conception — or rather misconception — of economics that is far better equipped in respect to form than of substance. In consequence, the major work that needs to be done is Marshallian rather than Walrasian in character. [Friedman 1955, p. 909]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumol, W. J. 1959. Economic Dynamics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1971. “Hicks on Ricardo on Machinery.” Economic Journal 81(324):916–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1975a. “Marxian Analysis.” Industrial Relations 30(4):772–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1975b. “Marshall and Samuelson in Perspective.” Eastern Economie Journal 2(3), Supp., pp. 164–174. Proceedings of the 1974 Convention, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1978. “Modèles statiques et modèles dynamiques en développement économique.” L’Actualité Economique (October-December), pp. 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1979. “Towards a Realistic Dynamics.” Journal of Economies 5:39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, E. F. 1980. “A Search for a Theory of Change.” Journal of Economies 6:161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. 1965a. “The Nature and Meaning of Equilibrium Theory.” In D. Martindale, ed. Functionalism in the Social Sciences. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. 1965b. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 2: The Neo-classical Theory.” Econometrica 33:736–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. 1970. “External Economies of Scale and Competitive Equilibrium.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3):347–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, C. R. 1930. “Adam Smith and the Dynamic State.” Economic Journal 40(157):25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. E. 1972. Microeconomic Theory. Homewood, 111.: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1955. “Walras and His Economic System,” American Economic Review 45(5):900–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1966. Analytical Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1970. “The Economics of Production.” American Economic Review 60(2):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gide, C., and C. Rist. 1913. A History of Economic Doctrines. Trans. from the French edition of 1913. Boston: Heath (no date).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. A. 1976. “Rigor and Relevance in a Changing Institutional Setting.” American Economic Review 66(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. A. J. 1969. Aggregation in Economic Analysis: An Introductory Survey. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K. L. 1969. Aggregation in Economics: A Theoretical and Empirical Study. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H., and R. O. C. Matthews. 1964. “The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey.” Economic Journal 74(296):779–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. 1949. Towards a Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, B. G. 1965. Investment Demand and U.S. Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. 1932. Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. 1965. Capital and Growth. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S. 1931. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. 1906. “The Effect of Labor-Saving Devices upon Wages.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 20:86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1932. “A Case against Technical Progress?” Economica 12:180–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotowitz, Y. 1969. “Technical Progress, Factor Substitution and Income Distribution in Canadian Manufacturing 1926–39 and 1946–61.” Canadian Journal of Economics 2(91):106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krehm, W. 1975. Price in a Mixed Economy: Our Record of Disaster. Toronto: Thornwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. G., and P. O. Steiner. 1972. Economics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. 1958. “Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: Misplaced Concreteness and Disguised Politics.” Economic Journal 68(269):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, D. 1974. “Employment Implications of Industrialisation in Developing Countries.” Economic Journal 84(335):491–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O. 1972. “Thirteen Points in Contemporary Economic Theory: An Interpretation.” Journal of Economic Literature 10(4):1163–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, H. 1942. “‘Permanent’ Technological Unemployment.” American Economic Review 32(l):50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1974. “Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus.” Economic Journal 84(336):886–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps Brown, E. H. 1972. “The Underdevelopment of Economics.” Economic Journal 82(325):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. 1929. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. 1928. “The Representative Firm.” Economic Journal 38(151):387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W. E. G. 1966. Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1965. “A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weisäker Lines.” Review of Economics and Statistics 47(4):343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1966. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson. 2 vols. Ed. by J. E. Stiglitz. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1967.“The Monopolistic Competition Revolution.” In R. E. Kuenne, ed. Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1972. “Maximum Principles in Analytical Economics.” American Economic Review 62(3):249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Literature 16(4):1415–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A., and A. Scott. 1966. Economics. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. 1970. “A Curmudgeon’s Guide to Microeconomics.” Journal of Economic Literature 8(2):405–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1965. The Shape of Automation for Men and Management. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. 1965. Capital Theory and the Rate of return. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1926. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36(144):535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. 1976. “The Xistence of X-Efficiency”. American Economic Review 66(1):213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, J. K. 1974. “The Marshallian System in 1881: Distribution and Growth.” Economic Journal 84(333):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38(152):527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Earl F. Beach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

George R. Feiwel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Kluwer • Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beach, E.F. (1982). Samuelsonian Theory and the Process of Change. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics. Recent Economic Thought, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7377-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7377-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7379-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7377-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation