Advertisement

A geomorphic approach for examining the role of periphyton in large watersheds

  • Robert J. Naiman
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 17)

Abstract

Geomorphic analysis of watersheds, when combined with biotic studies of specific ecosystem components, place these components in a proper ecosystem perspective. In undisturbed boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, annual periphyton production can be reliably predicted from stream order and extrapolated to the watershed level when combined with some simple geomorphic analyses. At the watershed scale periphyton contribute only 11 to 27% to total ecosystem metabolism, depending on the size of the watershed. The most metabolically active components are fine particulate organic matter (0.5 μm-1 mm) and mosses.

Keywords

River Watershed Drainage Network Basin Area Stream Order Stream Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bott, T.L., Brock, J.T., Cushing C.E., Gregory S.V., King, D., & Petersen, R.C., 1978. A comparison of methods for measuring primary productivity and community respiration in streams. Hydrobiologia 60: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Culp, J.M., & Davies, R.W., 1982. Analysis of longitudinal zonation and the river continuum concept in the Oldman-South Saskatchewan River system. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 1258–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunne, T., & Leopold, L.B., 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman. 818 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 56: 275–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., Miller, J.P., 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W.H. Freeman. 522 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Lotspeich, F.B., 1980. Watersheds as the basic ecosystem: this conceptual framework provides a basis for a natural classification. Water. Res. Bull. 16: 581–586.Google Scholar
  7. Morisawa, M., 1968. Streams: Their Dynamics and Morphology. McGraw-Hill. 175 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Naiman, R.J., 1982. Characteristics of sediment and organic carbon export from pristine boreal forest watersheds. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 1699–1718 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Naiman, R.J., 1983. The annual pattern and spatial distribution of aquatic oxygen metabolism in boreal forest watersheds. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Naiman, R.J., & Sedell, J.R., 1980. Relationships between metabolic parameters and stream order in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 834–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Naiman, R.J., Sedell, J.R., 1981. Stream ecosystem research in a watershed perspective. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 21: 804–811.Google Scholar
  12. Power, G., Pope, R.F., & Coad, B.W., 1973. Postglacial colonization of the Matamek River by fishes. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30: 1586–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38: 913–920.Google Scholar
  14. Vannote, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K.W., Sedell J.R., & Cushing, C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish Aquat. 37: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Naiman
    • 1
  1. 1.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations