Advertisement

Sensory receptors involved in the feeding behaviour of the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli

  • Elizabeth Wurdak
  • Pierre Clément
  • Jacqueline Amsellem
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 14)

Abstract

A study of the anterior sensory receptors of male and female Asplanchna brightwelli by scanning electron microscopy reveals some important differences in the region surrounding the mouth. In the male, the ventrolateral sensory bristles, the pseudotrochus, the inner and the outer buccal tufts and the mastax receptors are absent. The oral receptors are reduced.

Transmission electron microscopy of these receptors shows that they consist of ciliated sensory cells surrounded by epithelial supporting cells. The distal ends of the cilia of the mastax receptors are modified; the cilia of the other receptors differ only in their length and rootlet structure from the locomotor cilia of the cingulum.

A consideration of the feeding behaviour of Asplanchna leads us to suppose that these sensory cilia function in mechanoreception and in chemoreception.

Keywords

rotifers sensory receptor feeding behavior scanning electron microscopy transmission electron microscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bullock, T. H. Horridge, G. A., 1965. Structure and Function in the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates. W. H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco and London, Vol. I, 24-31 and 601–604.Google Scholar
  2. Clément, P ., 1977. Introduction à la photobiologie des rotifères dont le cycle reproducteur est contrôlé par la photopériode. Approches ultrastructurale et expérimentale. Thèse No. 7716. Université Claude Bernard (Lyon I). 1–262.Google Scholar
  3. Clément, P., Wurdak, E. S. Amsellem, J., 1983. Behavior and ultrastructure of sensory receptors in rotifers, this volume.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, J. J ., 1968. Dietary control of sexuality in the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli Gosse. Physiol. Zool. 41: 14–43.Google Scholar
  5. Gilbert, J. J ., 1976a. Selective cannibalism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi: Contact recognition of morphotype and clone. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73: 3233–3237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilbert, J. J., 1976b. Sex-specific cannibalism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi. Science 194: 730 - 732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert, J. J ., 1977a. Control of feeding behavior and selective cannibalism in the rotifer Asplanchna. Freshwat. Biol. 7: 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, J. J., 1977b. Defenses of males against cannibalism in the rotifer Asplanchna: size, shape and failure to elicit tactile feeding responses. Ecology 58: 1128 - 1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J. J ., 1978. Selective feeding and its effect on polymorphism and sexuality in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert, J. J., 1980a. Observations on the susceptibility of some protists and rotifers to prédation by Asplanchna girodi. Hy- drobiologia 73: 87 - 91.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, J. J., 1980b. Feeding in the rotifer Asplanchna: Behavior, cannibalism, selectivity, prey defenses and impact on rotifer communities. In: Kerfoot, W. C. (ed.) Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp. 158 - 172.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, J. J. Birky, C. W. Jr., 1971. Sensitivity and specificity of the Asplanchna response to dietary a-tocopherol. J. Nutrition 101: 113 - 126.Google Scholar
  13. Hudson, C. T. Gosse, P. H., 1886. The Rotifera or Wheel Animalcules, Both British and Foreign. London. Vol. I. I-IV+. 1-128; Vol. II: 1–144.Google Scholar
  14. Koehler, J. K ., 1965. A fine structural study of the rotifer integument. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 12: 113–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leydig, F., 1854. Ueber den Bau und die systematische Stellung der Rädertiere. Z. wiss. Zool. Leipzig. 6: 1-120, T.I-IV.Google Scholar
  16. Masius, J., 1890. Contribution à l’étude des Rotateurs. Arch. Biol. 10: 651-682.Google Scholar
  17. Pantin, C. F. A ., 1962. Notes on microscopical technique for zoologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1–76.Google Scholar
  18. Plate, L., 1886. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Rotatorien. Jenaische Z. Naturw. 19: 1-118.Google Scholar
  19. Remane, A., 1929-1933. Rotatoria. In: Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreiches. Bd. 4, Abt. 2/1: 1-448.Google Scholar
  20. Reynolds, E. S ., 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain. J. Cell. Biol. 17: 208–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1974. Plankton Rotifers. Biology and Taxonomy. Die Binnengewässer. 26. Suppl.: 1 - 146.Google Scholar
  22. Waniczek, H ., 1930. Untersuchungen über einige Arten der Gattung Asplanchna Gosse (A. girondi de Guerne, A. brightwelli Gosse, A. priodonta Gosse). Ann. Mus. Zool. Pol. 8: 109–321.Google Scholar
  23. Wurdak, E. S., 1978. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the cellular stomach and gastric gland of female Asplanchna sieboldi and of the rudimentary gland of male Asplanchna sieboldi (Rotifera). Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H: 1 - 170.Google Scholar
  24. Wurdak, E. S. and Gilbert, J. J., 1980. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the rudimentary gut of male Asplanchna sieboldi ( Rotifera ). Hydrobiologia 73: 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Wurdak
    • 1
  • Pierre Clément
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Amsellem
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Histologie et Biologie Tissulaire, L.A. C.N.R.S. 244 and R.C.P. C.N.R.S. 657Université Lyon IVilleurbanneFrance

Personalised recommendations