Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 82))

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Ever since H. Poincaré [1] asserted the conventional nature of the geometry of physical space, there has been a debate on this problem, particularly since a new kind of space was introduced by Einstein’s General Relativity. Accounts and bibliographies were given by many authors, among which we cite A. Griinbaum [2] and J. Ehlers [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Poincaré, H., 1962. Science et Hypothèse. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grünbaum, A., 1973. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Second, en-larged edition. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 12. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlers, J., 1973. “The Nature and Structure of Spacetime.” In The Physicist’s Con-ception of Nature, ed. by J. Mehra, pp. 71–91. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avishai, Y., and H. Ekstein, 1974. ‘Einstein’s Equivalence Principle. An Explicit Statement and Its Derivation from Special Relativistic Presymmetry.’ Commun. Math. Phys. 37, 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deser, S., 1970. ‘Self-Interaction and Gauge Invariance’ General Relativity and Gravitation 1, 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thirring, W., 1961. ‘An Alternative Approach to the Theory of Gravitation.’ General Relativity and Gravitation 1,9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schild, A., 1962. ‘Gravitational Theories of the Whitehead Type and the Principle of Equivalence.’ In Evidence for Gravitational Theories, ed. by C. Miller, pp. 69–115. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Einstein, A., 1973. ‘Reply to Criticisms’ In Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist, ed. by P. Schilpp, p. 677. La Salle, 111.: Open Court Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lie, S., 1935. Ges. Abhandlungen, Vol. 2/1, pp. 374–469. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mackey, G. W., 1963. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Havas, P., 1964. ‘Four-Dimensional Formulations of Newtonian Mechanics and Their Relation to the Special and General Theory of Relativity’ Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ekstein, H. (1984). Is Physical Space Unique or Optional?. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Physical Sciences and History of Physics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 82. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7178-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7178-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7180-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7178-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics