Abstract
At the beginning of Western political theory a powerful analogy links the practice of technology to that of politics. In his Republic, Laws, Statesman, and other discourses, Plato asserts that statecraft is a technē, one of the practical arts. Much like architecture, the building of ships and other commonly recognized arts and crafts, politics is a field of practice that has its own distinctive knowledge, its own special skills. One purpose of Plato’s argument was to discredit those who believed that the affairs of public life could be left to mere amateurs. But beyond that, it is clear that he thought the art of politics could be useful in the same way as any other techne, that is it could produce finished works of lasting value. The works he had in mind were good constitutions, supremely well-crafted products of political architecture. Politeia, the title of the Republic in Greek, means the constitution of a polis, the proper order of human relationships within a city-state. The dialogue describes and justifies what Plato holds to be the institutional arrangements appropriate to the best politeia. He returns to this theme in the Laws, a discussion of the “second best” constitution, comparing his work to that of a well-established craft. “The shipwright, you know, begins his work by laying down the keel of the vessel and indicating her outlines, and I feel myself to be doing the same thing in my attempt to present you with outlines of human lives. . . . I am really laying the keels of the vessels by due consideration of the question by what means or manner of life we shall make our voyage over the sea of time to the best purpose.”1
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Plato, Laws, 7.803b, translated by A. E. Taylor, in The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1961 ), p. 1374.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, translated and introduced by Maurice Cranston (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1968 ), p. 84.
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 9, in The Federalist Papers, with an introduction by Clinton Rossiter (New York: Mentor Books, 1961 ), pp. 72–73.
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, in The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson, edited by Adrienne Koch and William Peden ( New York: Modern Library, 1944 ), pp. 28–281.
John Kasson, Civilizing the Machine: Technology and Republican Values in America, 1776-1900 ( New York: Grossman, 1976 ).
Albert O. Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1977 ).
Denison Olmsted, “On the Democratic Tendencies of Science,” Barnard’s Journal of Education, 1 (1855–1856), reprinted in Changing Attitudes toward American Technolocy, Thomas Parke Hughes (ed.), ( New York: Harper amp; Row, 1975 ), p. 148.
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation ( Boston: Beacon Press, 1957 ), p. 33.
Langdon Winner, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, Massachusetts: M. I. T. Press, 1977 ).
A recent sent of commentaries on the relative efficacy of regulation is contained in The Politics of Regulation, James Q. Wilson (ed.) (New York: Basic Books, 1980).
Amory B. Lovins, “Technology Is the Answer! (But What Was the Question?): Energy as a Case Study of Inappropriate Technology,” discussion paper for the Symposium on Social Values and Technological Change in an International Context, Racine, Wisconsin, June 1978, p. 1.
Amory B. Lovins, Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1977), pp. 6–7 .
J. L. Smith, “Photovoltaics,” Science, June 26, 1981, Vol. 212, No. 4502, pp. 1472–1478.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winner, L. (1983). Technē and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society. In: Durbin, P.T., Rapp, F. (eds) Philosophy and Technology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7126-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7124-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive