Abstract
In this final chapter, I shall discuss the view that morality must be or may be based on divine command or divine approval, the view, i. e., that what one ought (not) to do depends solely on what God wills. I shall discuss this view in part because of its historical practical importance, but principally because it represents a kind of position in terms of which there is but a single right-making consideration. I have already made clear my skepticism about the tenability of any such single-principle views. Part of my argument is designed to show the unacceptability of any view which holds that ‘oughtness’ is defined in terms of or otherwise constituted by the subjective reaction (e. g., approval) of any observer, divine or human, actual or ideal.
“By the command of God, death can be inflicted on any man, guilty or innocent, without any injustice whatever.”
— Aquinas, Treatise on Law
“Without God All is Permitted.”
— Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamozov
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richman, R.J. (1983). “With God All is Permitted”. In: God, Free Will, and Morality. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7077-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7077-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7079-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7077-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive