Skip to main content

Some Complexity Considerations Concerning Hypotheses In Multidimensional Contingency Tables

  • Chapter
  • 145 Accesses

Part of the book series: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences ((TPCI,volume 9A))

Abstract

A simple formal representation of hierarchical log-linear hypotheses (models) for multidimensional contingency tables is presented. This representation leads to a complexity hierarchy between these hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop Y.M.M., Fienberg S.E., Holland P.W. (1975): Discrete multivariate analysis:theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch J.N., Lauritzen S.L., Speed T.P. (1980): Markov fields and log-linear models for contingency tables. Annals of Statistics 8, 522–539.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch J.N., Speed T.P. (1979): Multiplicative and additive models and interactions. Res.rep.49., Department of Theoretic Statistics, University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enke H. (1980): To some reasonable test procedures in multiple contingency tables to investigate certain epidemiological or medico-sociological relationships. Biometrical Journal 22, 779–793.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman L.A. (1970): The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: interactions among multiple classifications. J. Amer. Statistical Assoc. 65, 226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman L.A. (1971): Partitioning of chi-square, anylysis of contingency tables, and estimation of expected frequencies in multidimensional contingency tables, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66, 339–344.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Havránek T. (1982): O analyze mnohorozmérných kontingenčních tabulek (On analysis of multidimensional contingency tables). In: Robust 82, JČMF, Prague, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek P., Havránek T. (1978): Mechanizing hypothesis formation - mathematical foundations for a general theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wermuth N. (1976): Model search among multiplicative models. Biometrics 32, 253–263.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wermuth N. (1980): Linear recursive equations, covariance selection and path analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75, 963–972.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 ACADEMIA, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Havránek, T. (1983). Some Complexity Considerations Concerning Hypotheses In Multidimensional Contingency Tables. In: Transactions of the Ninth Prague Conference. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, vol 9A. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7013-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7013-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7015-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7013-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics