Advertisement

Evolution: The Whitworth Gun in Huxley’s War for the Liberation of Science from Theology

  • Ruth Barton
Part of the Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 2)

Abstract

An apology is needed for yet another article on Thomas Huxley and the conflict between science and religion. Recent analyses justifiably argue that Huxley is atypical and ‘the conflict’ exaggerated. Studies of the accommodations between science and theology are now needed.2 One purpose of this essay is to draw attention to a seldom-noticed accommodation made by Huxley. Two important recent studies find. New emphases in Huxley’s writings. In James Moore’s Post-Darwinian Controversies Huxley appears in strange guise, advocating a reconciliation between science and Calvinism.3 Many studies have found inconsistencies and inadequacies in Huxley’s agnosticism. James Paradis’ analysis of Huxley’s world view extends these criticisms and concludes that the concept of the order of nature is more fundamental to Huxley’s thought than his proclaimed agnosticism.4 By re-examining Huxley’s theological attitudes and arguments I hope to clarify these theses. With respect to the theme of this volume, I argue that Huxley’s ‘wider domain’ was not evolutionary thought but naturalistic thought.

Keywords

Natural Knowledge Powerful Weapon Paleontological Evidence Free Inquiry Religious Feeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. B. Wilson, ‘Victorian Science and Religion’, History of Science XV, 1977, pp. 52–67;Google Scholar
  2. J. R. Moore, The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 18701900 (Cambridge, 1979 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. J. G. Paradis, T. H. Huxley: Man’s Place in Nature ( Lincoln, Nebraska, 1978 ).Google Scholar
  4. W. Houghton, The Rhetoric of T. H. Huxley’, University oj Toronto Quarterly XVIII, 1949, pp. 159–175.Google Scholar
  5. O. Chadwick, The secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1975), p. 170Google Scholar
  6. G. Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution (London, 1959), pp. 319–330;Google Scholar
  7. F. M. Turner, Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England ( New Haven, Conn., 1974 ), pp. 8–37.Google Scholar
  8. T. H. Huxley, Science and “Church Policy”, The Reader IV, 1864, p. 821Google Scholar
  9. White, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom (New York, 1913, 1st edn, 1896 ), Vol. I, p. xii.Google Scholar
  10. B. G. Murphy, ‘Thomas Huxley and His New Reformation’, Diss. Northern Illinois, 1973, pp. 53–79;Google Scholar
  11. F. M. Turner, ‘Victorian Scientific Naturalism and Thomas Carlyle’, Victorian Studies XVIII, 1975, pp. 325–343;Google Scholar
  12. C. F. Harrold, Carlyle and German Thought, 1819–1834 (New Haven, 1934 );Google Scholar
  13. B. M. G. Reardon, From Coleridge to Gore: A Century of Religious Thought in Britain (London, 1971 );Google Scholar
  14. T. McFarland, Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition (Oxford, 1969 );Google Scholar
  15. S. Prickett, Romanticism and Religion: The Tradition of Coleridge and Wordsworth in the Victorian Church (Cambridge, 1976 );Google Scholar
  16. H. Höffding, A History of Modern Philosophy tr. B. E. Meyer, Vol. II (New York, 1955, 1st edn, 1900 ).Google Scholar
  17. B. Willey, op. cit. (Note 23, 1966 ), p. 239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht, Holland 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Barton
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Australian Institute of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations