Abstract
A growing number of social historians and sociologists of science have come to think of scientific knowledge as a ‘contingent cultural product, which cannot be separated from the social context in which it is produced’, and they have begun to explore the possibility of there being direct ‘external’ or what are generally regarded as ‘non-scientific’ influences on the content of what scientists consider to be genuine knowledge.2 In their view, scientific assertions are ‘socially created and not directly given by the physical world as previously supposed’.3 This is not to assert that science is merely a matter of convention — that the external world does not constrain scientific conclusions — but rather that scientific knowledge ‘offers an account of the physical world which is mediated through available cultural resources; and these resources are in no way definitive’.4
Children — (if it please God) — constant companion, (friend in old age) who will feel interested in one, object to be beloved and played with — better than a dog anyhow – Home and someone to take care of house — Charms of music and female chit-chat. These things good for one’s health. Forced to visit and receive relations but terrible loss of time…
Only picture to yourself a nice soft wife on a sofa with good fire, and books and music perhaps — compare this vision with the dingy reality of Grt Marlboro’ St. Marry — Marry — Marry. Q. E. D.
No children (no second life), no one to care for one in old age…
Freedom to go where one liked — Choice of Society and little of it. Conversation of clever men at clubs…
Loss of time — cannot read in the evenings — fatness and idleness — anxiety and responsibility — less money for books etc…
Perhaps my wife won’t like London; then the sentence is banishment and degradation with indolent idle fool
Charles Darwin, Notes on the Question of Marriage, 1837–8.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. T. Ghiselin, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1972), pp. 214–231.
M. T. Ghiselin, The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1974 ).
F. Darwin (ed.), op. cit. (Note 19), Vol. III, pp. 89–91; also More Letters of Charles Darwin ed. F. Darwin (New York, 1903), Vol. II, pp. 31–37.
C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Reprint of First Edition, ed. J. W. Burrow (Harmondsworth, 1968 ), p. 136.
See S. J. Gould, Ontogeny and Phytogeny ( Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1977 ), pp. 115–166.
C. Vogt Lectures on Man: His Place In Creation, and in the History of the Earth ed. J. Hunt (London, 1864), p. 183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richards, E. (1983). Darwin and the Descent of Woman. In: Oldroyd, D., Langham, I. (eds) The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6986-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6986-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6988-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6986-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive