Temporal and Causal Asymmetry
There is a sense in which the causal relation is associated with the temporal direction earlier to later rather than the reverse. There is also a sense in which irreversible natural processes define a unique temporal direction. Just what these senses are needs to be clarified. But pending such clarification it seems clear that one can raise the question whether there is any relation between these two directions (the “direction of causation” and the “arrow of time”), and if so, what it is. This paper attempts to clarify, sharpen and return a provisional answer to this question. The philosophical aim which lies behind the investigation (but sometimes becomes more explicit) is to approach an improved understanding of the place of causation in physics, in the world, and in our thought. To introduce the relevance of our question to this aim, consider two opposing approaches to causation.
KeywordsCausal Relation Irreversible Process Causal Power Epistemic Community Conceptualist Criterion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Davies, P. C. W. : 1974, The Physics of Time Asymmetry, Surrey University Press, London.Google Scholar
- Grünbaum, A. : 1963, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
- Healey, R. : 1981, ‘Statistical Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and the Directedness of Time’, in Reduction, Time and Reality, ed. by R. Healey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Kant, I.: 1781, Critique of Pure Reason.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, D. : 1977,‘Demonstratives’ (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. O. : 1973, The Roots of Reference, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Reichenbach, H. : 1956, The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. : 1912, ‘On the Notion of Cause’, in Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
- Sklar, L. : 1974, Space, Time and Spacetime, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Sklar, L. : 1981, ‘Up and Down, Left and Right, Past and Future’, Noüs 15, 111–29.Google Scholar