Photoelectronic imaging and optical recording

  • G. J. Arink
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSE, volume 61)


The management of diagnostic images and patient records which at present is done by filing films and paper documents is subject to improvement. Especially, with the growing variety and intensity of use of digital imaging modalities the need for communication of images and for computer compatible mass storage has drastically increased.

The traditional film files have associated with them problems of slow access, loss of images, virtually no possibility for interaction with the stored information, large space requirements, and manual clerical work. The images made by digital modalities are archived by means of CRT hardcopy films and by recording the digital image data on magnetic tape and diskettes. This is done because the CRT camera cannot accurately represent the large contrast resolution available in the digital image data.

Moreover, the increasing number of digital imaging modalities necessitates integration and fast access to all the available diagnostic information of a patient during examination planning and treatment, which cannot be offered by existing filing systems.

Newly emerging optical disk systems more adequately perform archival storage because they offer large capacity random access, and have only a fraction of the media cost.

The digital optical recorder is a computer peripheral which stores 1000 M bytes of user data on each side of an optical disk with a diameter of 30 cm (12 inches). The user data rate of recording is in the range of 0.25 to 1 M byte/second. The bit error rate is better than 10–12, and the archival life is longer than 10 years. Taking into account the requirements of a 500 bed hospital a ten year image file is stored on about 3000 optical disks, occupying a small office room.

Realisation of a digital image management system requires interfaces to the image generating systems and to diagnostic viewing consoles.

Inclusion of large area radiographs is done by a high resolution film digitizer. Output of diagnostic images is done mostly on high-resolution CRT displays.

Elective hardcopy film output is provided by a computer compatible hardcopy unit.

These elements as well as the database architecture and transmission network demand a detailed study of performance requirements and system planning of the user interfaces. The concepts and solutions developed in the Picasso project (Picture Computation and Storage System) of the Philips’ Research Laboratories in Hamburg and in the Megadoc project of the Philips’ Research Laboratories in Eindhoven demonstrate the feasibility of diagnostic image management systems.


Optical Disk Digital Modality Image Management Archival Storage Arithmetic Logic Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    William M. Angus, M.D. Ph. D Diagnostic image management today and the future In: Digital Subtraction Angiography: An Application of Computerized Fluoroscopy C.A. Mistretta a.o., Eds. Year Book Publ., Chicago, 1982Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    K. Bulthuis, M.G. Carasso a.o. Ten billion bits on a disk IEEE Spectrum, August 1979; 26-33Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    M.P. Capp Radiological imaging - 2000 A.D Radiology 138: 541-550, March 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    J.J. Darlak Nonfilm radiographic image transmission and storage with remote and random access Proc. PACS Conf., Jan. 18-21, 1982 SPIE Vol. 318 part I, p. 186-192Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    J.A. Dinklo Digital optical disk systems In: The computer in the Doctor’s Office; O. Rienhoff and M.E. Abrams, Eds. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Local Networks Electronic Design, Vol 29, No. 8, April 16, 1981, p. 89-140Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    D. Meyer-Ebrecht The management and processing of medical pictures: An architecture for systems and processing devices 1980 IEEE Workshop on Picture Data Description and Management August 27-29, 1980 Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    J.S. Nadan Recent advances in digital optical recording Proc. PACS Conf., Jan. 18-21, 1982 SPIE vol 318 part I, p. 32-35Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    T. Takaya and V. Pollack Laser scanning system for the digital transmission of X-ray pictures over voice-grade telephone channels Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, May 1978, Vol 16, p. 316-322Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    H.J. Trussell Processing of X-ray images Proc. IEEE, Vol 69, No. 5, May 1981, p. 615-627Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    J.A. de Vos MEGADOC - A document archiving system based on digital optical recording Symposium Outlook for Optical and Video Disk Systems and Applications The Institute for Graphic Communication July 27-29, 1980 Carmel, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    K.G. Vosburgh Storage and retrieval of radiographic images Radiology, 123; 619-624, June 1977Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Th. Wendler a.o Modular multiprocessor picture computer architecture for distibuted picture information systems Proc. PACS Conf., Jan. 18-21, 1982 SPIE Vol 318 part I, p. 125-132Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    T. Wendler and D. Meyer-Ebrecht A proposal standard for variable format picture processing and codec approach to match diverse imaging devices In: Proc. Picture Archiving and Communication Systems, Jan. 18-21, 1982 SPIE Vol 318 part I, p. 298-305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Arink
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips Medical Systems DivisionEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations