Abstract
It is a special feature of modern societies that we identify, plan, and carry out programs designed to improve our social systems. It is also our experience that the programs do not always produce their intended improvements. Often, it is difficult to decipher whether programs have any impact at all, so complex is the ongoing social system into which programs are introduced and so inadequate are our methodologies for determining impact. To overcome these problems, to help obtain valid empirical evidence about the effectiveness of new social programs, a branch of methodology termed societal experimentation was suggested by Campbell (1969). Common pseudonyms for societal experimentation are evaluation research (Suchman, 1967), social experiments, experimental policy research, and field experiments.
Revised version of a symposium address presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Association, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, April, 1977. Financial support for this address was provided by the Carnegie Corporation, the Russell Sage Foundation, the National Institute of Education, the Spencer Foundation, and the Department of Education of the Irish Government. The views expressed are solely those of the author.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abt, Clark C. (ed.). The Evaluation of Social Programs. Beverely Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1976.
Airasian, P.W. “Designing Summative Evaluation Studies at the Local Level.” In: W.J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in Education. Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1974, 145–200.
Airasian, P.W., Kellaghan, T., and Madaus, G.F. Societal Experimentation. Position paper prepared for a conference on “The Consequences of Educational Testing: A Societal Experiment,” funded by the Russell Sage Foundation, Dublin, Ireland, October, 1971.
American Psychological Association, Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Research with Human Participants, 1973.
Averch, H.A. et al. How Effective is Schooling? Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, 1972. Prepared for President’s Commission on School Finance.
Bennett, C.A. and Lumsdaine, A.A. Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975.
Boruch, R.F. “Bibliography: Illustrated Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning and Evaluation.” Evaluation, no. 1, 2 (1974), 83–87.
Campbell, D.T. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist, no. 4, 24 (1969), 404–29.
Campbell, D.T. “Considering the Case Against Experimental Evaluations of Social Innovations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, no. 1, 15(1970), 110–13.
Campbell, D.T. Methods for an Experimenting Society. Paper presented to the Eastern Psychological Association, April 17, 1971, and to the American Psychological Association, Sunday, September 5, Washington, D.C.
Campbell, D.T. “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” In:Lyons, G.M. (ed.), Social Research and Public Policies, Hanover, New Hampshire: The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College, 1975, 3–45.
Campbell, D.T. and Boruch, R.F. “Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects.” In: Bennett, C.A., and Lumsdaine, A.A. (eds.), Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975, pp. 195–296.
Campbell, D.T. and Erlebacher, A.E. “How Regression Artifacts in Quasi-Experimental Evaluations Can Mistakenly Make Compensatory Education Look Harmful.” In Hellmuth, J. (ed.), Disadvantaged Child, vol. 3, Compensatory Education: A National Debate. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1970.
Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
Caro, F.G. (ed.) Readings in Evaluation Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1971.
Cicirelli, V.G. et al. The Impact of Head Start: An Evaluation of the Effects of Head Start on Children’s Cognitive and Affective Development. A report presented to the Office of Economic Opportunity pursuant to Contract B89-4536, June 1969. Westinghouse Learning Corporation, Ohio University. (Distributed by Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Institute for Applied Technology, PV 184 328).
Cohen, D.K. “Politics and Research: Evaluation of Social Action Programs in Education.” Review of Educational Research, no. 2, 40 (1970), 213–38.
Coleman, J.S. et al. Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Office of Education, Washington, D.C., 1966.
Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.
Gilbert, J.P., and Mosteller, F. “The Urgent Need for Experimentation.” In: Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.) On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972,371–83.
Gilbert, J.P., Light, R.T., and Mosteller, F. “Assessing Social Innovations: An Empirical Base for Policy.” In: Bennett, C.A. and Lumsdaine, A.A. (eds.), Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975, 39–194.
Glass, G.V., Wilson, V.L. and Gottman, J.M. Design and Analysis of Time Series Experiments, Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado Press, 1974.
Grant, G. “Shaping Social Policy: The Politics of the Coleman Report,” Teachers College Record, no. 1, 75 (1973), 17–54.
Hodgson, G. “Do Schools Make a Difference?” Atlantic Monthly, (March 1973), 35–46.
House, E.R. (ed.) School Evaluation, the Politics and Process. Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1973.
Jencks, C. et al. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books, 1972.
Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G.F. and Airasian, P.W. The Effects of Standardized Testing. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1982.
Kelman, H.C. On Human Values and Social Research. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass lnc, 1968.
Kershaw, D.N. Issues in Income Maintenance Experiments. In: Rossi, P. and Williams, W. (eds.), Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972,221–245.
Madaus, G.F., Airasian, P.W., Kellaghan, T. School Effectiveness: A Reassessment of the Evidence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
McDill, E.L., McDill, M.S., and Sprehe, J.T. Strategies for Success in Compensatory Education. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.
Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972.
Moynihan, D.P. “Sources of Resistance to the Coleman Report.” Harvard Educational Review, no. 1, 38 (1968), 23–25.
Moynihan, D.P. The Politics of a Guaranteed Income. The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan. New York: Random House, 1973.
Mullen, E.J. et al. Evaluation of Social Intervention. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1972.
Riecken, H.W. and Boruch, R.F. Social Experimentation. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Rivlin, A.M. Systematic Thinking for Social Action. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1971.
Rivlin, A.M. and Timpane, P.M. (eds.) Planned Variation in Education. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1975.
Rossi, P.C. “Testing for Success and Failure in Social Action.” In: Rossi, P.C. and Williams, W. (eds.), Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 11–49.
Rossi, P.C. and Williams, W. (eds.). Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Rotberg, I.C. and Wolf, A. Compensatory Education: Some Research Issues. Policy Studies Program, Division of Research, National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C., 1974.
Russell Sage Foundation, Guidelines for Collection, Maintenance and Dissemination of Pupil Records, 1970.
Skipper, J.S. and Leonard, R.C. “Children, Stress, and Hospitalization: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9 (1968), 275–87.
Smith, M.S. “Equality of Educational Opportunity: The Basic Findings Re-considered.” In: Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972, 230–342.
Stanley, J.C. “Controlled Field Experiments as a Model for Evaluation.” In: Rossi, P. and Williams, W. (eds.) Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 67–71.
Suchman, E.A. Evaluation Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.
Tobin, J. “The Case for an Income Guarantee.” Public Interest, (Summer 1966), 31–41.
Williams, W. “Implementation Problems in Federally Funded Programs.” In: Williams, W. and Elmore, R.F. (eds.), Social Program Implementation. New York: Academic Press, 1976, 15–40.
Zaltman, G. and Duncan, R. Strategies for Planned Change. New York: Wiley Inter-science, 1977.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Airasian, P.W. (1983). Societal Experimentation. In: Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6671-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6669-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive