Skip to main content

Societal Experimentation

  • Chapter
Evaluation Models

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 6))

  • 891 Accesses

Abstract

It is a special feature of modern societies that we identify, plan, and carry out programs designed to improve our social systems. It is also our experience that the programs do not always produce their intended improvements. Often, it is difficult to decipher whether programs have any impact at all, so complex is the ongoing social system into which programs are introduced and so inadequate are our methodologies for determining impact. To overcome these problems, to help obtain valid empirical evidence about the effectiveness of new social programs, a branch of methodology termed societal experimentation was suggested by Campbell (1969). Common pseudonyms for societal experimentation are evaluation research (Suchman, 1967), social experiments, experimental policy research, and field experiments.

Revised version of a symposium address presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Association, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, April, 1977. Financial support for this address was provided by the Carnegie Corporation, the Russell Sage Foundation, the National Institute of Education, the Spencer Foundation, and the Department of Education of the Irish Government. The views expressed are solely those of the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abt, Clark C. (ed.). The Evaluation of Social Programs. Beverely Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airasian, P.W. “Designing Summative Evaluation Studies at the Local Level.” In: W.J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in Education. Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1974, 145–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airasian, P.W., Kellaghan, T., and Madaus, G.F. Societal Experimentation. Position paper prepared for a conference on “The Consequences of Educational Testing: A Societal Experiment,” funded by the Russell Sage Foundation, Dublin, Ireland, October, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association, Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Research with Human Participants, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H.A. et al. How Effective is Schooling? Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, 1972. Prepared for President’s Commission on School Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C.A. and Lumsdaine, A.A. Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R.F. “Bibliography: Illustrated Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning and Evaluation.” Evaluation, no. 1, 2 (1974), 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist, no. 4, 24 (1969), 404–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. “Considering the Case Against Experimental Evaluations of Social Innovations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, no. 1, 15(1970), 110–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. Methods for an Experimenting Society. Paper presented to the Eastern Psychological Association, April 17, 1971, and to the American Psychological Association, Sunday, September 5, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. “Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.” In:Lyons, G.M. (ed.), Social Research and Public Policies, Hanover, New Hampshire: The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College, 1975, 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Boruch, R.F. “Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects.” In: Bennett, C.A., and Lumsdaine, A.A. (eds.), Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975, pp. 195–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Erlebacher, A.E. “How Regression Artifacts in Quasi-Experimental Evaluations Can Mistakenly Make Compensatory Education Look Harmful.” In Hellmuth, J. (ed.), Disadvantaged Child, vol. 3, Compensatory Education: A National Debate. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, F.G. (ed.) Readings in Evaluation Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicirelli, V.G. et al. The Impact of Head Start: An Evaluation of the Effects of Head Start on Children’s Cognitive and Affective Development. A report presented to the Office of Economic Opportunity pursuant to Contract B89-4536, June 1969. Westinghouse Learning Corporation, Ohio University. (Distributed by Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Institute for Applied Technology, PV 184 328).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.K. “Politics and Research: Evaluation of Social Action Programs in Education.” Review of Educational Research, no. 2, 40 (1970), 213–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. et al. Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Office of Education, Washington, D.C., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.P., and Mosteller, F. “The Urgent Need for Experimentation.” In: Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.) On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972,371–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.P., Light, R.T., and Mosteller, F. “Assessing Social Innovations: An Empirical Base for Policy.” In: Bennett, C.A. and Lumsdaine, A.A. (eds.), Evaluation and Experiment, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1975, 39–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V., Wilson, V.L. and Gottman, J.M. Design and Analysis of Time Series Experiments, Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G. “Shaping Social Policy: The Politics of the Coleman Report,” Teachers College Record, no. 1, 75 (1973), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. “Do Schools Make a Difference?” Atlantic Monthly, (March 1973), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R. (ed.) School Evaluation, the Politics and Process. Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. et al. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G.F. and Airasian, P.W. The Effects of Standardized Testing. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H.C. On Human Values and Social Research. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass lnc, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, D.N. Issues in Income Maintenance Experiments. In: Rossi, P. and Williams, W. (eds.), Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972,221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G.F., Airasian, P.W., Kellaghan, T. School Effectiveness: A Reassessment of the Evidence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDill, E.L., McDill, M.S., and Sprehe, J.T. Strategies for Success in Compensatory Education. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D.P. “Sources of Resistance to the Coleman Report.” Harvard Educational Review, no. 1, 38 (1968), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D.P. The Politics of a Guaranteed Income. The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan. New York: Random House, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E.J. et al. Evaluation of Social Intervention. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, H.W. and Boruch, R.F. Social Experimentation. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A.M. Systematic Thinking for Social Action. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A.M. and Timpane, P.M. (eds.) Planned Variation in Education. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.C. “Testing for Success and Failure in Social Action.” In: Rossi, P.C. and Williams, W. (eds.), Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 11–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.C. and Williams, W. (eds.). Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, I.C. and Wolf, A. Compensatory Education: Some Research Issues. Policy Studies Program, Division of Research, National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell Sage Foundation, Guidelines for Collection, Maintenance and Dissemination of Pupil Records, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, J.S. and Leonard, R.C. “Children, Stress, and Hospitalization: A Field Experiment.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9 (1968), 275–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.S. “Equality of Educational Opportunity: The Basic Findings Re-considered.” In: Mosteller, F. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 1972, 230–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J.C. “Controlled Field Experiments as a Model for Evaluation.” In: Rossi, P. and Williams, W. (eds.) Evaluating Social Action Programs: Theory, Practice and Politics. New York: Seminar Press, 1972, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, E.A. Evaluation Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. “The Case for an Income Guarantee.” Public Interest, (Summer 1966), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. “Implementation Problems in Federally Funded Programs.” In: Williams, W. and Elmore, R.F. (eds.), Social Program Implementation. New York: Academic Press, 1976, 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G. and Duncan, R. Strategies for Planned Change. New York: Wiley Inter-science, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Airasian, P.W. (1983). Societal Experimentation. In: Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6671-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6669-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics