Advertisement

Program Evaluation

A Historical Overview
Chapter
Part of the Evaluation in Education and Human Services book series (EEHS, volume 6)

Abstract

Program evaluation is often mistakenly, viewed as a recent phenomenon. People date its beginning from the late 1960s with the infusion by the federal government of large sums of money into a wide range of human service programs, including education. However, program evaluation has an interesting history that predates by at least 150 years the explosion of evaluation during the era of President Johnson’s Great Society and the emergence of evaluation as a maturing profession since the sixties. A definitive history of program evaluation has yet to be written and in the space available to us we can do little more than offer a modest outline, broad brush strokes of the landscape that constitutes that history. It is important that people interested in the conceptualization of evaluation are aware of the field’s roots and origins. Such an awareness of the history of program evaluation should lead to a better understanding of how and why this maturing field has developed as it did. As Boulding (1980) has observed, one of the factors that distinguishes a mature and secure profession from one that is immature and insecure is that only the former systematically records and analyzes its history. Therefore since program evaluation continues to mature as a profession, its origins and roots need to be documented.

Keywords

School District Program Evaluation Historical Overview American Educational Research Association Royal Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Educational Research Association and National Council on Measurements Used in Education. Technical Recommendations for Achievement Tests.Washington, D.C.: Author, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques.Washington, D.C.: Author, 1954.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests and Manuals.Washington, D.C.: Author, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S., and Bogatz, G.A. The First Year of Sesame Street: An Evaluation. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Ballou, F.A. “Work of the Department of Educational Investigation and Measurement, Boston, Massachusetts.” In: G.M. Whipple, (ed.), Standards and Tests for the Measurement of the Efficiency of Schools and School Systems. National Society for the Study of Education, Fifteenth Yearbook, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1916.Google Scholar
  7. Biddle, B.J., and Ellena, W.J. (eds.) Contemporary Research on Teacher Effectiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, B.S.; Engelhart, M.D.; Furst, E.J.; Hill, W.H.; and Krathwohl, D.R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co., 1956.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, B.S.; Madaus, G.F.; and Hastings, J.T. Evaluation to Improve Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Bogatz, G.A., and Ball, S. The Second Year of Sesame Street: A Continuing Evaluation. 2 vols. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. Boulding, K.E. “Science, Our Common Heitage.” Science, no. 4433, 207 (1980), 831–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brinkerhoff, R. “Evaluation Technical Assistance: Reflections on a National Effort.” CEDR Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. Bunda, M.A. Catalog of Criteria for Evaluating Student Growth and Development. Toledo: Toledo, Ohio Public Schools and the Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Callahan, R.E. Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D.T. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist, no. 4, 24 (1969), 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching.” In: N.L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.Google Scholar
  17. Chase, F. Educational Quandries and Opportunities. Dallas, Texas: Urban Education Studies, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Cicirelli, V. G. et al. The Impact of Head Start: An Evaluation of the Effects of Head Start on Children’s Cognitive and Affective Development. Study by Westinghouse Learning Corporation and Ohio University. Washington, D.C.: Office of Economic Opportunity, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, J.S.; Campbell, E.Q.; Hobson, C.J. et al. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1966.Google Scholar
  20. Cook, D.L. Program Evaluation and Review Technique Applications in Education. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. Cremin, L.A. The Transformation of the School. New York: Knopf, 1962.Google Scholar
  22. Crisp, J.J. The Brink. New York: Viking Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. Cronbach, L.J. “Course Improvement through Evaluation.” Teachers College Record, 64 (1963): 672–83.Google Scholar
  24. Cronbach, L.J. Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1980.Google Scholar
  25. Eisner, E.W. “Educational Objectives: Help or Hindrance?” The School Review, 75 (1967): 250–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisner, E.W. The Perceptive Eye: Toward the Reformation of Educational Evaluation. Stanford, California: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, December 1975. Evaluation News. Sponsored by the Evaluation Network, Sage Publications, no. 2, 2 (1981).Google Scholar
  27. Evers, J.W. “A Field Study of Goal-Based and Goal-Free Evaluation Techniques.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1980.Google Scholar
  28. Glaser, R. “Instructional Technology and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions.” American Psychologist 18 (1963): 519–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glass, G.V. “Primary, Secondary, and Meta Analysis of Research.” Educational Reseacher, no. 10, 5 (1976), 3–8.Google Scholar
  30. Glass, G. V. et al. Data Analysis of the 1968-69 Survey of Compensatory Education, Title I, Final Report on Grant No. OEG8-8-9618604003-(058). Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, 1970.Google Scholar
  31. Guba, E.G. A Study of Title III Activities: Report on Evaluation. Indiana University, National Institute for the Study of Educational Change, October 1966.Google Scholar
  32. Guba, E.G., and Lincoln, Y.S. Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. Hammond, R.L. “Evaluation at the Local Level.” Address to the Miller Committee for the National Study of ESEA Title III, 1967. Ireland. Royal Commission of Inquiry into Primary Education. Report of the Commissioners. (H.C. 1870, xxviii, part i).Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, R. Directory ofEvaluators and Evaluation Agencies. New York: Exxon Corporation 1980.Google Scholar
  35. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Standards for Evaluations of Educational Programs, Projects, and Materials. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1981a.Google Scholar
  36. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Principles and By-Laws. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, 1981b.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, A. The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.Google Scholar
  38. Kellaghan, T. and Madaus, G.F. Trends in Educational Standards in Great Britain and Ireland. In G.R. Austin & H. Garber (eds.), The Rise and Fall of National Test Scores. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  39. Kendall, C.N. “Efficiency of School and School Systems.” In Proceedings and Addresses of the Fifty-third Annual Meeting of the National Education Association, 389–95, 1915.Google Scholar
  40. Krathwohl, D.R.; Bloom, B.S.; and Masia, B.B. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., 1964.Google Scholar
  41. Krol, R. A. “A Meta Analysis of Comparative Research on the Effects of Desegregation on Academic Achievement.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1978.Google Scholar
  42. Lindquist, E.F. Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1953.Google Scholar
  43. Madaus, C.F.; Airasian, P.W.; and Kellaghan, T. School Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1980.Google Scholar
  44. Madaus, G.F., and McDonagh, J.T. “As I Roved Out: Folksong Collecting as a Metaphor for Evaluation.” In N.L. Smith (ed.), Communicating in Evaluation: Alternative Forms of Representation. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
  45. May, P. “Standardized Testing in Philadelphia, 1916–1938.” Unpublished manuscript, 1971.Google Scholar
  46. Metfessel, N.S. and Michael, W.B. “A Paradigm Involving Multiple Criterion Measures for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of School Programs.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 27 (1967): 931–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. National Society for the Study of Education. Methods for Measuring Teachers’ Efficiency. Fourteenth Yearbook, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1916.Google Scholar
  48. Peck, H. “Report on the Certification of Evaluators in Louisiana.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Educational Research Association, Lexington, Kentucky, Fall 1981.Google Scholar
  49. Phi Delta Kappa Commission on Evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Itasca, Illinois: Peacock Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
  50. Picariello, H. Evaluation of Title I. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for the Advancement of Science, 1968.Google Scholar
  51. Pinker, R. Social Theory and Social Policy. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  52. Popham, W.J. Criterion-referenced Measurement. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 1971.Google Scholar
  53. Provus, M. Discrepancy Evaluation Model, 1969. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh Public Schools, 1969.Google Scholar
  54. Provus, M. Discrepancy Evaluation. Berkeley, California: McCutcheon Publishing Co., 1971.Google Scholar
  55. Reinhard, D. “Methodology Development for Input Evaluation Using Advocate and Design Teams.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1972.Google Scholar
  56. Rice, J.M. “The Futility of the Spelling Grind.” The Forum 23 (1897): 163–72.Google Scholar
  57. Rice, J.M. Scientific Management in Education. New York: Hinds, Noble & Eldredge, 1914.Google Scholar
  58. Ridings, J. Catalog of Criteria for Evaluating Administrative Concerns in School Districts. Toledo: Toledo, Ohio Public Schools and the Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, 1980.Google Scholar
  59. Roth, J. “Needs and the Needs Assessment Process.” Evaluation News 5 ( 1977): 15–17.Google Scholar
  60. Roth, J.E. “Theory and Practice of Needs Assessment With Special Application to Institutions of Higher Learning.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1978.Google Scholar
  61. Scriven, M.S. “The Methodology of Evaluation.” In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, no. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
  62. Scriven, M.S. “Pros and Cons about Goal-Free Evaluation.” Evaluation Comment 3 (1974): 1–4.Google Scholar
  63. Scriven, M.S. Evaluation Bias and its Control. Occasional Paper Series no. 4. Western: Michigan University Evaluation Center, 1975.Google Scholar
  64. Scriven, M. and Roth, J.E. “Needs Assessment.” Evaluation News 2 (1977): 25–28.Google Scholar
  65. Scriven, M. and Roth, J.E. “Needs Assessment: Concept and Practice.” New Directions for Program Evaluation 1 (1978): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, E.R., and Tyler, R.W. Appraising and Recording Student Progress. New York: Harper, 1942.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, H.L., and Judd, C.H. Plans for Organizing School Surveys. National Society for the Study of Education, Thirteenth Yearbook, Part II. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1914.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, N.L. Metaphors for Evaluation: Sources of New Methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1981a.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, N.L. New Techniques for Evaluation. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1981b.Google Scholar
  70. Stake, R.E. “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation.” Teachers College Record 68 (1967): 523–40.Google Scholar
  71. Stake, R.E. “Setting Standards for Educational Evaluators.” Evaluation News no. 2, 2 (1981), 148–52.Google Scholar
  72. Stake, R.E. “The Case-Study Method in Social Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 7 (1978): 5–8.Google Scholar
  73. Stake, R.E. “Setting Standards for Educational Evaluators.” Evaluator News no. 2, 2 (1981), 148–52.Google Scholar
  74. Stake, R.E., and Gjerde, C. An Evaluation of T-City, the Twin City Institute for Talented Youth. AERA Monograph Series in Curriculum Evaluation, no. 7. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974.Google Scholar
  75. Stufflebeam, D.L. “The Use and Abuse of Evaluation in Title III.” Theory into Practice 6 (1967): 126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stufflebeam, D.L. Needs Assessment in Evaluation. Audio-tape of presentation at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, San Francisco, September 1977. Published by the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  77. Stufflebeam, D.L. “Meta Evaluation: An Overview.” Evaluation and the Health Professions, no. 2, 1(1978).Google Scholar
  78. Stufflebeam, D.L. et al. Educational Evaluation and Decision-Making. Ithaca, Illinois: Peacock Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
  79. Suarez, T. “Needs Assessments for Technical Assistance: A Conceptual Overview and Comparison of Three Strategies.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Western Michigan University, 1980.Google Scholar
  80. Thompson, D. England in the Nineteenth Century (1815–1914). Baltimore: Penguin Books, Inc., 1950.Google Scholar
  81. Tyack, D., and Hansot, E. Managers of Virtue. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  82. Tyler, R.W. “Changing Concepts of Educational Evaluation.” In: R.E. Stake (ed.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, vol. 1, New York: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
  83. U.S. Office of Education. Education of the Disadvantaged: An Evaluation Report on Title 1, Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Fiscal Year 1968. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1970.Google Scholar
  84. Webster, W.J. The Organization and Functions of Research and Evaluation Units in a Large Urban School District. Dallas Texas: Dallas Independent School District, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing 1983

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations