Abstract
More than ever before in our nation’s history, the spirit of consumerism and participation has taken hold. Recently, in California, the people expressed their sentiment with the passage of Proposition 13. Only now, after the attending emotionalism has subsided, are the cold, disheartening facts and consequences becoming evident. Clearly, the vote was based more on frustration than on informed understanding of what the law would actually accomplish.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Guba, E. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, no. 8. University of California at Los Angeles, 1978.
Le vine, M. “Experiences in adapting the jury trial to the problem of educational program evaluation.” Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1976.
Mann, D. Policy decisions in education: An introduction to calculation and control. New York: Teacher’s College Press, 1975.
Popham, W.J., and Carlson, D. “Deep dark deficits of the adversary evaluation model.” Educational Researcher, no. 6, 6 (1977), 3–6.
Thurston, P. “Revitalizing adversary evaluation: Deep dark deficits or muddled mistaken musings.” Educational Researcher, no. 7, 7 ( 1978), 3–8.
Wolf, R.L. “The application of judicial concepts to educational evaluation.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1973.
Wolf, R.L. Evidence and Evaluation: The metaphors of law. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1974a.
Wolf, R.L. “Trial by jury.” The Phi Delta Kappan, November 1974b.
Wolf, R.L. “Operationalizing responsive evaluation.” Unpublished manuscript, Indiana Center for Evaluation, 1975.
Wolf, R.L. Studying school governance through judicial evaluation procedures. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana Center for Evaluation, 1978a.
Wolf, R.L. Judicial metaphors in education: Past, present and future. 1978b.
Wolf, R.L. and Tymitz, B.L. “Ethnography and reading: Matching inquiry mode to process.” Reading Research Quarterly, September 1976.
Wolf, R.L. and Tymitz, B.L. Enhancing policy formulation through naturalistic/judicial inquiry procedures: A study of the individual education program component of public law 94-142. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana Center for Evaluation, 1977a.
Wolf, R.L. and Tymitz, B.L. “Framing issues in naturalistic/judicial inquiry.” Unpublished manuscript, Indiana Center for Evaluation, 1977b.
Worthen, B.R. and Owens, T.R. “Adversary evaluation and the school psychologist.” Unpublished monograph, Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, January 1978.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolf, R.L. (1983). The use of Judicial Evaluation Methods in the Formulation of Educational Policy. In: Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6671-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6669-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive