Skip to main content

Political Economy: Problems with Paradigms

  • Chapter
Political Economy

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 2))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

There is no entry for political economy in the last edition (1968) of the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences nor, less surprisingly, for a number of terms familiar to many readers: public choice, public goods, electoral-business cycle (or equivalent), among others. And, although many aspects of Marxism are discussed there at length, virtually no attention is given to Marx’s, or his successors’, views of government or the state and its relationship to economic systems and developments. Moreover, there is no discussion of the Keynesian view of politics, although Keynesian economics arguably dominates the thought of economic advisors to Western governments. These omissions do not reflect adversely on the generally impressive work of the encyclopedia’s authors and editors, but indicate how substantial are the problems facing those intrepid scholars who would seek a higher synthesis of politics and economics. Entire seas have been left unfished

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Samuel P. Huntington, American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 )

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, the essays in Henry Hazlitt, (ed.), The Critics of Keynesian Economics (New York: Van Nostrand, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  3. For more recent assessments, see Harry G. Johnson, The Shadow of Keynes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Hicks, The Crisis in Keynesian Economics (New York: Basic Books, 1974 )

    Google Scholar 

  5. An excellent balanced treatment is Alex Leijonhufvud, On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes ( London: Oxford University Press, 1968 )

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Maynard Keynes, The New Republic, July 29, 1940

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money ( London: MacMillan, 1936 )

    Google Scholar 

  8. William Beveridge’s Full Employment in a Free Society (New York: Norton, 1945)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allan Peacock, The Economic Analysis of Government (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979) for a more extended discussion

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Skidelsky, ed.,The End of the Keynesian Era: Essays on the Disintegration of the Keynesian Political Economy (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fred Hirsch and John H. Goldthorpe, eds.,The Political Economy of Inflation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norman J. Vig, “Post-Keynesian Economics and Politics: Toward an Expectationist Theory of Democracy?” World Politics, 34 (October 1981 ): 62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. William Greider, “The Education of David Stockman,” The Atlantic Monthly (December 1981): 27–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. “The 1980 Midyear Review of the Economy: The Recession and the Recovery,” Joint Economic Committee, 96th U.S. Congress, 2nd session (August 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. James Tobin, “Reagan’s Counterrevolution,” New York Review of Books, 28 December 3, 1981 ): 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. An influential statement of this position is Max Weber’s 1921 article, “Class, Status, Party,” in Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, trans, and eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1946 )

    Google Scholar 

  17. Political Science Quarterly, 89 (March 1974): 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, among many others, Manuel Castells, The Economic Crisis and American Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  19. James O’Connor, The Fiscal Crisis of Capitalism (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alan Wolf, The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edward S. Herman, Corporate Control, Corporate Power (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Albert Szymanski, The Capitalist State and the Politics of Class (Cambridge: Winthrop, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edward S. Greenberg, Serving the Few (New York: Wiley, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. William Domhoff, The Powers that Be: Processes of Ruling Class Domination in America (New York: Random House, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1956 )

    Google Scholar 

  26. James Madison, Federalist Ten; Arthur Bentley, The Process of Government (San Antonio: Principia, 1949) first published in 1908

    Google Scholar 

  27. David B. Truman, The Governmental Process, 2nd ed. (New York: Knopf, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robert Dahl, Pluralist Democracy in the United States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Theodore J. Lowi, The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd ed. (New York: Norton, 1979 )

    Google Scholar 

  30. James Q. Wilson, Political Organizations ( New York: Basic Books, 1973 )

    Google Scholar 

  31. Charles E. Lindblom, Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems ( New York: Basic Books, 1977 ), p. 193

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huntington, American Politics, p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ernest Mandel, Late Capitalism (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  34. For example, Ralph Miliband, The State in Capitalist Society (New York: Basic Books, 1969)(pp. 276–77)

    Google Scholar 

  35. As with Afrikaner nationalism and racism in John S. Saul and Stephen Gelb, The Crisis in South Africa: Class Defense, Class Revolution ( New York: Monthly Review Press, 1981 )

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wolf, The Limits of Legitimacy, cautions radicals to regard civil liberties as more than mere capitalistic legitimations, although why they are not precisely that is not clear. A transhistorical commitment to civil liberties is a feature of many contemporary Marxist studies

    Google Scholar 

  37. Albert Szymanski, Is the Red Flag Still Flying? ( London: Zed Press, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  38. Edward S. Malecki, The Capitalist State: Structural Variations and Its Implications for Radical Change, Western Political Quarterly, 34 (June 1981): 246–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Miliband, Marxism and Politics, ch. 1

    Google Scholar 

  40. For a telling rejection of Marxist claims of capitalist mystification, see Guenter Lewy,False Consciousness: An Essay on Mystification ( New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1982 )

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gustav A. Wetter,Dialectical Materialism ( New York: Praeger, 1958 ), pp. 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  42. James MacGregor Burns,Deadlock of Democracy (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963) is such an attack on the Madisonian Model

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miliband, Marxism and Politics, p. 17

    Google Scholar 

  44. Douglas Adair, “ ‘That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science’: David Hume, James Madison, and the Tenth Federalist,”Huntington Library Quarterly, 20(1957): 343–60

    Google Scholar 

  45. Although there are very different understandings of the transformation rules involved. For example, contrast those of Marx with those of Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper and Bros., 1942 ), and Daniel Bell, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism ( New York: Basic Books, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. M. Wood and N. Wood, Class, Ideology and Ancient PoliticalTheory (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978). Also see Richard Ashcraft, “Political Theory and the Problem of Ideology,” The Journal of Politics, 42 (August 1980): 687-705

    Google Scholar 

  47. The assumptions, problems, and development of public choice are treated at length in Dennis C. Mueller, Public Choice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979 ). A short history by one of the founders is James M. Buchanan, The Economics of Politics ( London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, 1978 )

    Google Scholar 

  48. Randall Bartlett,Economic Foundation of Political Power ( New York: The Free Press, 1973 ), p. 10

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kenneth Arrow’s Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. ( New York: Wiley, 1963 )

    Google Scholar 

  50. L. L. Wade, “Political Theory and Public Finance,” in W. Samuels and L. L. Wade, edsTaxing and Spending Policy ( Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1980 )

    Google Scholar 

  51. See, for example, James M. Buchanan, The Limits of Liberty (Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 1975 ), and, if he may be included as an economic reasoner in politics, John Rawls, A Theory of Justice ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  52. Buchanan, The Economics of Politics, p. 17

    Google Scholar 

  53. James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock,The Calculus of Consent (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962). Also see James M. Buchanan and Richard E. Wagner, Democracy in Deficit (New York: Academic Press, 1977), and Geoffrey Breton and James M. Buchanan, The Power to Tax (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980 ). On bureaucratic and legislative rules, see William A. Niskanen, Bureaucracy and Representative Government ( Chicago: Aldine, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. C. Pigou,Wealth and Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1912). John Burton, “Externalities, Property Rights and Public Policy,” in The Myth of Social Cost (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1978), pp. 71–91, quotes Paul A. Samuelson’s Economics, 9th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973), p. 475, as a typical example: “Whenever there are externalities, a strong case can be made for supplanting complete individualism by some kind of group action.”

    Google Scholar 

  55. R. H. Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost,”Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October 1960): 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. John Burton, “Externalities, Property Rights and Public Policy,” pp. 84–7

    Google Scholar 

  57. L. L. Wade, “Public Administration, Public Choice, and the Pathos of Reform,”Review of Politics, 41 (July 1979): 344–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Larry L. Wade

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wade, L.L. (1983). Political Economy: Problems with Paradigms. In: Wade, L.L. (eds) Political Economy. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6658-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6658-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6660-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6658-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics