Abstract
In their classic work Normative Systems Carlos Alchourr6n and Eugenio Bulygin applied to legal science methodological tools developed, as they put it, in other fields of knowledge. They had in mind especially the methodology of mathematics and physics, and the notion of a system employed in these fields of exact science(1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aarnio, A., 1977, On Legal Reasoning, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. B - Tom 144, Turku, 1977.
Aarnio, A., 1980, Tieteellisen edistyksen kysymyksiä oikeustieteessä, (Questions of Scientific Progress in Legal Science, in Finnish), Suomen Akatemian iulkaisuia 6/1979, pp.17–87, Helsinki, 1980.
Aarnio, A., 1983a, ‘The Development of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law in Finland’, in Aarnio, 1983c, pp. 9–46.
Aarnio, A., 1983b, ‘Paradigm Articulation in Legal Research’, in Aarnio, 1983c, pp. 209–221.
Aarnio, A., 1983c, Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence, Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 36, 1983.
Alchourrón, C. and Bulygin E., 1971, Normative Systems, Springer-Verlag, Wien and New York, 1971.
Balzer, W., and Sneed J., 1977, ‘Generalized Net Structures and Empirical Theories I’, Studia Logica, Vol.36, pp.195–211.
Carnap, R., 1963, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1963.
Hanson, N.R.,m 1958, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1958.
Hanson, N.R., 1971, Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science, Harper and Row, New York, 1971.
Hintikka, J., 1970, ‘Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic’, in R. Hilpien (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, pp. 59–104, D.Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland, 1970.
Krajewski, W., Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Science, D.Reidel, Dordrecht,Holland, 1977.
Kuhn, T., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1962.
Kuhn, T., 1970, ‘Reflections on My Critics’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Critisicm and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1970, pp. 231–278.
Niiniluoto, I., 1980, ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gründer, and E. Agazzi (ed.) Pisa Conference Proceedings, Vol. I, pp. 3–47, D.Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1980.
Moulines, C.U., 1979, ‘Theory-Nets and the Evolution of Theories: The Example of Newtonian Mechanics’,Synthese 41, pp.417–439.
Pearce, D. and Rantala, V., (forthcoming), ‘Continuity and Scientific Discovery’, Communication and Cognition.
Pearce, D. and Rantala, V., ‘New Foundations for Metascience’, Synthese 56, 1983, 1–26.
Shapere, D., 1965, ‘Introduction’ to D. Shapere (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Natural Science, MacMillan, New York, 1965.
Sintonen, M., The Pragmatics of Scientific Explanation, Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 37, Helsinki 1984
Sneed, J. 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D.Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1971.
Sneed, J., 1976, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach’, Erkenntniss 10, pp.115–176.
Stegmüller, W., 1976, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg and Berlin, 1976.
Stegmüller, W., 1979, The Structuralist View of Theories. A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, 1979.
Toulmin, S., 1953, The Philosophy of Science, Hutchison, London, 1953.
Toulmin, S., 1961, Foresight and Understanding, Hutchison, London, 1961.
Toulmin, S., 1972, Human Understanding,Vol.I, Princeton University Press, Princeton,1972.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sintonen, M. (1984). Pragmatic Metatheory for Legal Science. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive