Skip to main content

Integration between Legal Research and Social Science

  • Chapter
Theory of Legal Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 176))

  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of integration of the study of law with social sciences was ardently proclaimed in the period immediately after World War II, The programming activities were followed by manifold attempts at carrying such integration into effect. Integration, one can say, came into fashion, and was considered a panacea for various shortcomings of the study of law. In the literature an enthusiastic tone dominated, accompanied by complaints that the jurists of the older generation do not properly estimate the profits of integration, and that the representatives of social sciences frequently do not reciprocate the promptness in the study of law to cooperate with them (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Comp.L.Nowak-S.Wronkowska, “Zagadnienie integracj i nauk prawnych w polskiej literaturze teoretycznoprawnej” (“Problem of integration of the study of law in the Polish legal theoretical literature”), Studia Metodologiczne, v.V, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.N.Llewellyn, “A realistic jurisprudence: The next step”, Columbia Law Review, v.XX, 431,1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K.N.LlewellynLegal tradition and social science method, Brooking Institution, Essays on research in the social sciences, New York 1931

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.N.Llewellyn On reading and using the newer jurisprudence Columbia Law Review, v.XL,581, 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K.OpaƂek, Zagadnienia teorii prawa i teorii polityki (“Problems of legal and political theory”), Warszawa 1983, Ch.VII: “Dzisiejszy stan nauk politycznych” (“The present status of political science”), p. 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Comp.J.Wróblewski, “Zagadnienie przedmiotu i metody teorii pafistw. i prawa” (“Problem of the subject- matter and method of the theory of State and law”), Pafistow i Prawo 11, 1961;

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.N.Llewellyn, “Law and social sciences-especially sociology”, Harvard Law Review, v.LXII,1949.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comp. esp.O.Neurath, “Soziologie im Physikalismus”, Erkenntnis, v. II, 1931;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Comp., e. g., L.M.Friedman-S.Macaulay(eds.), Law and the behavioral sciences, I and II ed., Indianapolis 1969, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Rehbinder, Rechtssoziologie, Berlin-New York 1977

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Rottleuthner, Rechtstheorie und Rechtssoziologie, MĂŒnchen 1981, and the literature cited there.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Podgórecki, Socjologia prawa (“Sociology of law”), Warszawa 1962;

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Podgórecki “Socjologia a nauki prawne” (“Sociology and the study of law”),Panstwo i Prawo 5–6, 1962;

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Podgórecki “Problem klasyfikacji nauk prawnych” (“Problem of classification of legal disciplines”) Studia Sociologiczne 1, 1967, and the following discussion in Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Comp.D. Grimm (ed.), Rechtswissenschaft und Nachbarwissenschaften, v.I, Frankfurt a.M.1973, v.II, Munchen 1976

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.Kowalski, Psychologiczna teoria prawa i paƄstwa Petrazyckiego (The psychological theory of law and State of Leon Petrazycki), Waszawa 1963, Ch.VII 3, p.180 f: K.OpaƂek (ed.) “Z zagadinien teorii nauki i teorii prawa Leona Petrazyckiego” (“Problems of the theory of science and legal theory of Leon Petrazycki”), Warszawa 1969 (passim).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Luhmann, Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts. Beitrage zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, Frankfurt a.M. 1981.Ch.9: lich — what is not the case now (p.191). Luhmann

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. OpaƂek, Peculiarities of legal science and the problem of integration, Archivum Juridicum Cracoviense, v.I,1968 on similar phenomena in social sciences see (e. g. P.A.Sorokin, Fads and foibles in modern sociology and related sciences, Chicago 1956;

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.Gellner, The alchemists of sociology, Inquiry, v. II 2,1959,p.128 f.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A.R. Anderson, “A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic”, Mind 67, 1958, p. 100 f; comp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G.H. von Wright, “On the logic and ontology of norms”, Philosophical logic, ed. by J.W.Davis, D.J.Hockney, W.K.Wilson, Dordrecht 1970, p.70 f.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Aarnio, R. Alexy, A. Peczenik, “The foundation of legal reasoning”, Rechtstheorie, v.XII, 1981, p.430 f.) “ought entails can”, in: G.H. von Wright, “Norm and action.A logical enquiry”, London 1963, Ch.VII;

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.M. Hare, Freedom and reason, Oxford 1963, p.51 f; there is a vast literature on paradoxa of deontic logic, comp. on this subject G.Kalinowski, La logique des norms, Paris 1972, Ch.III and IV.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.Delorme, “Sociologiczna a psychologiczna plaszczyzna badaƄia prawa” (“The sociological and the psychological plane of legal research”), Panstwo i Prawo 10, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. OpaƂek, “Law as social phenomenon”, Archiv fĂŒr Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, V.IVII, 1971, p.47 f.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.L. Austin, How to do things with words, ed. J.O. Urmson, Oxford 1962, p.8,14 f; J.Wolefiski, JZ zagadnieƄ analitycznej filozofii prawa, (“Problems of the analytic philosophy of law”), Krakow 1980, p.69 f., 89, 91 f., 93 f.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

OpaƂek, K. (1984). Integration between Legal Research and Social Science. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics